Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Torricelli's trumpet wrong?

  • 31-01-2006 5:44pm
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 443 ✭✭


    According to wikipedia torricelle's trumpet has infinite surface volume. Is there some proof for its infinite volume, because I'm pretty sure I could show that it has finite volume... Or has that paradox already been solved and wikipedia just doesn't have it written?


Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,806 ✭✭✭i71jskz5xu42pb


    According to wikipedia torricelle's trumpet has infinite surface volume.

    You're confused I think. The paradox is that the shape has a finite volume with an infinite surface area.

    The proof is right there in Wikipedia (or Mathworld if you want something more detailed).


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 443 ✭✭Fallen Seraph


    Sorry, I mangled my words. I meant infinite surface area. And I know the proof of its volume, but I say that I believe that I can show that the surface area is also finite. Am I just wrong?


  • Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators Posts: 10,501 Mod ✭✭✭✭ecksor


    Have you attempted the proof? Or have you attempted to find a flaw in the proof presented on those pages linked by PaschalNee? That would probably be a better way to get to the heart of the matter faster.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 443 ✭✭Fallen Seraph


    Hmmm... Ah yes. Well would someone then mind telling me what's wrong with this analysis of the surface area of't please?


    Take any section of the 2-d graph between n and n+1 where n is x coordinate and E n and assume that it's a straight line of m=0 through y=f(n) between these points. If this is rotated about the y - axis it will form a cylinder which will have a total surface area larger than the corresponding bit of the trumpet. The TSA of a cylinder will be 2(pi)rh. h will be 1. r will be f(n). As n approaches infinity, f(n) will tend towards 0 => the TSA of the cylinder will tend towards 0. Therefore the sum of all these cylinders will approach a definite number. And since the TSA of the trumpet is less than the cylinders it must also be a definite number.


    I can't see the flaw in that reasoning, I'd greatly appreciate't if someone would be so kind as to enlighten me.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 443 ✭✭Fallen Seraph


    Ah, nevermind. I've seen the flaw.


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 93,583 Mod ✭✭✭✭Capt'n Midnight


    Tip
    If you want to paint the outside, simply half-fill a larger trumpet with paint and dip the first one inside.


Advertisement