wider signatures?

SolarNexus

just wondering why image sigs are limited to 300px wide.

I can keep well within the size limit with a banner 500px by 120px, and it doesnt look so squashed up.

just wondering, as its a real pain switching from a usual more than adequately acceptable 500px by 120px (a lot of forums allow much bigger sizes... I think this is the best, imho) template to something rather limiting.

Pigman II

Just wondering how small your penis has to be to have an image-sig to begin with.

SolarNexus

Pigman II wrote:

Just wondering how small your penis has to be to have an image-sig to begin with.

if your best argument is one of comparing body parts, you should keep out of it

steveland?

SolarNexus wrote:

just wondering why image sigs are limited to 300px wide.

I can keep well within the size limit with a banner 500px by 120px, and it doesnt look so squashed up.

just wondering, as its a real pain switching from a usual more than adequately acceptable 500px by 120px (a lot of forums allow much bigger sizes... I think this is the best, imho) template to something rather limiting.

I know I'd prefer not to see a 500px wide signature every time I open a thread you posted in...

Karl Hungus

To be fair, I post on some forums where the signiature image sizes are far more strict, so I think boards is fairly liberal with it's sig rules in this respect, yet I also post on other forums where there are pretty much no sig rules, and it ends up with a lot of people really taking things to extremes, with sometimes not one, but two huge images in signiatures.

So, I think we're ok the way we are now is grand. Things aren't too in your face, and you still get plenty of scope to do lots with your signiature.

bennyx_o

If it's not broken, don't try to fix it. The rules are fine the way they are

Mimikyu

This post has been deleted.

Matthewthebig

says the guy with the rule breaking sig

qz

Small sig pics ftw!

RuggieBear

Matthewthebig wrote:

says the guy with the rule breaking sig

Erm....Pot, your sig breaks the rules too you know.;)

520 x 120 would be as annoying as ****.

GoneShootin

SolarNexusits wrote:

a real pain switching from a usual more than adequately acceptable 500px by 120px (a lot of forums allow much bigger sizes... I think this is the best, imho) template to something rather limiting.

Wow - a real pain is it? How difficult can it be to resize your amazing sig image to fit the boards.ie guidelines? It's not like anyone will give a **** if they don't see your sig image for the want of you bleating about the rules.

And where is your facts to back up this claim that 500px x 120px is "adequately acceptable". Imo 300px by 120px - is loads. The best sigs on boards are the smaller ones - as the smallest ones require the most fine tuning and tweaking"

Finally -

Matthewthebig

007px

dammit

you caught me Ruggie

i was unaware myself

rsynnott

I read boards in a small window. If anyone's post stretches outside if that window due to huge sig, I won't read it. I doubt I'm the only one.

Sparky

i know mine is breaking the rules, but her legs are so damn good.

GoneShootin

rsynnott wrote:

I read boards in a small window.

o_0

EXPLAINAGE!

netwhizkid

No let the rules as they are,
I Hate Change.*

*I love Change as in €€€'s and ¢¢¢'s though

rsynnott

GoneShootin wrote:

o_0

EXPLAINAGE!

What? What's wrong with that?

Matthewthebig

netwhizkid wrote:

No let the rules as they are,
I Hate Change.*

*I love Change as in €€€'s and ¢¢¢'s though

you're a prat
you're a prat
you're a prat

masteroftherealm

rsynnott wrote:

I read boards in a small window. If anyone's post stretches outside if that window due to huge sig, I won't read it. I doubt I'm the only one.

em rob you are man? thats pointless.

rsynnott

masteroftherealm wrote:

em rob you are man? thats pointless.

I have a 1024x768 monitor. I like to have the odd terminal window constantly visible. No worthwhile website that I know of requires large screen widths....

masteroftherealm

Alt Tav (well the mac equiv for ya) is your friend.

DeVore

Pigman banned for needless abuse.

DeV.