Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Flightplan

  • 28-11-2005 11:11am
    #1
    Closed Accounts Posts: 210 ✭✭


    Saw this one on Saturday. It's the new one with Jodie Foster.

    19m.jpg

    Story:
    Kyle Pratt (Jodie Foster) plays a woman in the mid-30's. She has a hard time because her husband died a week ago, suicide is the reason. Her daughter also suffers from the loss, is struggled that daddy's gone. In her professional life, Kyle works as a propulsion engineer, and designed the engines for the world's biggest airplane. Because of the tragedy, Kyle and Julia want to leave Germany and bring the coffin with her husband back. The new airplane is ready to go for its maiden voyage to New York.
    While in the air, six-year old Julia disappears. As Kyle is a mother, she's worried and believes that she can't have gone too far as there's no way out of a plane, that's in the air. Kyle informs the captain about this, he does some research and Kyle is been told that her daughter also died with her husband.....

    That's where the whole plot starts to unravel. I'm not saying anymore... If I did, I'd give away spoilers...

    Jodie Foster plays brilliant, as well as the little girl who plays her daugher. Sean Bean is Captain Rich, he plays outstanding.

    The movie is really brilliant, packed with action and it keeps you in the seat, you wanna see what happens next. The finale will really blow your mind...

    The movie gets a perfect

    10/10


    from me... It's been a long time since I've seen such a good thriller.

    It's also the first movie that's about a plane and New York since 9/11.

    My recommendation: If you like thrillers, action and Jodie Foster, go and see this one!!


Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 55,570 ✭✭✭✭Mr E


    Its a good movie. Definitely not worthy of 10/10, though....
    A solid 7/10 from me.

    From the very start, I was expecting
    a Sixth Sense style twist, but this was dismissed (thankfully) about an hour in. The ending is a bit more conventional, but it was still very good.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 118 ✭✭Teneka


    Awful, awful movie.

    Do not waste 8.50 on this tripe.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,792 ✭✭✭J.R.HARTLEY


    bang on the money teneka


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,078 ✭✭✭tabatha


    i dont think it was that good and i certainly dont think it had a sixth sense twist, had heard this before i went in and was expecting it all the way through. nothing to exciting at all!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,564 ✭✭✭✭whiskeyman


    Had a lot of potential (Foster always gives an excellent performance), but it's ending just makes a mockery of the whole plotline and of the viewer.
    I'd give it 6/10 at best.... giving this 10/10 is a joke tbh.

    In fact, I havent read one decent review of this since seeing it.... and the TV adverts include "great" views from all the usuals "News of the World, The Sun, Maxim"... this is usually the sign of a film that has been shredded by the real critics, so the film house / distributors nudge lots of freebies to the "film reviewers" in such publications.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 210 ✭✭HomunQlus


    whiskeyman wrote:
    giving this 10/10 is a joke tbh.

    10/10 is my opinion, not yours.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 47 Berkel


    Good movie - worth a watch - but no 10/10... Foster is very good, Bean is ok but I think its because he had a limited role, but some of the of the other acting is ...well...er....****e! I liked some of the filming styles and it all looks very good.

    6/10!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 10,921 ✭✭✭✭Pigman II


    Berkel wrote:
    good, Bean is ok but I think its because he had a limited role

    That's MR. Bean to you ya cheeky pup!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,952 ✭✭✭✭MisterAnarchy


    Decent enough old film but it has huge holes in the plot that are ridiculous.


  • Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 18,001 Mod ✭✭✭✭ixoy


    One of the reasons I don't want to see this is because the trailer (which was shown far too often) seemed to reveal huge amounts of the plot. Is there actually much more than what we see there or is the trailer, as it appears, giving away most of the turns and so on? (e.g) it implies
    the girl's on board but there's a conspiracy to take her and Jodie thinks she might be going mad but then sees the little heart that the brat drew on the window earlier and it's all related to her husband, who is probably not all that dead, etc.
    .


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,589 ✭✭✭✭Necronomicon


    Pretty woeful movie I thought. Without going into a rant, two things that bothered me:
    The air-marshel. The guy had the emotional capacity of a plank of wood. I don't think he made an expression for the entire film.
    The Arab characters. There was no closure on them. We see them staring into the room of Foster's daughter at the start of the movie, and they are obviously on the plane to put people off the right trail and suspect them instead. When Foster confronts them on the plane, they prove that they were at a hotel which seems to further indicate her descent into madness. In the end, we find out that they are insignificant. So why the whole part about them seemingly spying on the daughter?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,480 ✭✭✭projectmayhem


    saw it today. absolute ****e. Necromomicon's second point pissed me off majorly.

    i have to go see doom to watch some monsters being blown apart by a BFG just to offset this rubbish.

    it was 100% totally predictable, we made a game out of it in the cinema, predicting what'd come next

    foster puts in a good performance but it seems a bit overly done compared to the crap she had to work with (i normally enjoy bean, but his role was hardly demanding here)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,276 ✭✭✭Memnoch


    the movie was not bad as popcorn flicks go, an enjoyable ride but ultimately falls very short.

    Firstly it's highly predictable.

    Secondly the plot is highly suspect. There are so many gaping holes that anyone with a resonable intellect could tear the movie into shreds. There are far too many discrepancies and weaknesses which are glossed over by the directer in return for cheap thrills.

    The premise was good, the execution wasn't.

    6/10 with nothing to write home about.

    Women are probably more likely to enjoy it thanks to Foster's strong "mother, independant woman" role.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,564 ✭✭✭✭whiskeyman


    HomunQlus wrote:
    10/10 is my opinion, not yours.
    I know... but giving it 10/10 makes me, and many others, disregard your review almost straight away.


    And you giving it 10/10 is a joke... in my opinion :D


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 620 ✭✭✭Spider_Baby!


    Lol at the bit where
    she walks away from the plane ala "Die Hard" type movies, or the like, with the child in her arms


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,480 ✭✭✭projectmayhem


    Lol at the bit where
    she walks away from the plane ala "Die Hard" type movies, or the like, with the child in her arms
    "omg what's that she's holding?"


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 879 ✭✭✭sirpsycho


    whiskeyman wrote:
    Had a lot of potential (Foster always gives an excellent performance), but it's ending just makes a mockery of the whole plotline and of the viewer.
    I'd give it 6/10 at best.... giving this 10/10 is a joke tbh.

    Exactly what I would have said about this. 6/10.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,589 ✭✭✭✭Necronomicon


    "omg what's that she's holding?"
    Hehe, I chuckled at that too :p


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7 underpantsgirl


    starts off ok, but down hill from there


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,952 ✭✭✭✭MisterAnarchy


    The ending was preposterous.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,117 ✭✭✭✭MrJoeSoap


    Went to see it tonight, not a massive amount of brain-power involved. The plot seemed to have holes in it, and I'd give it a maximum of 6/10. Will definitely never watch it again anyway.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,738 ✭✭✭djkeogh


    saw this at a matinee during the week, glad I didn't pay full whack for it. Was alright but not great by any standards. Jodie Foster in Panic Room mode again with more panicking than before. The trailer had given away up to about an hour into the film i felt which is always bad. Twists were crap and didn't surprise or shock at all. Better stuff out there to be spending money on


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,281 ✭✭✭PullMyFinger!


    Didnt see the trailer and saw the film for free so the first hour was pretty decent. Then that ending came along. Not bad. Bit of a meh film, overall 6/10


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,583 ✭✭✭✭~Rebel~


    Agree with the "meh" opinion. Twas grand for the while i was in there, as soon as you even consider actually thinking about it, it completely falls apart. Mildly entertaining while watching, nothing special at all, definately wouldn't recommend anyone to go see it, or even rent. maybe sit down and watch it on tv in a few years for free instead..

    Quick Rant;
    In all fairness who in gods name is actually going to choose that method for highjacking a plane?! Absolutely so much could go wrong its unbelieveable. "So we'll kill this man, who's wife knows the plane really well, and then when she's on the plane with the coffin, we'll hide a bomb and take the kid. She's obviously going to react exactly as we predict". If any single thing they predicted went wrong it just fails. what if anybody sees the child at any point being carried away?!? What if she didn't use the back rows? Who's not gonna notice a strange man reaching over a sleeping mother, grabbing a sleeping child from her seatbelt and carrying her off down the avionics section?! Surely even if nobody suspected anything then at least later they could say "oh ya that guy there took her". Just stupid imho.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,082 ✭✭✭lostexpectation


    was sean bean in on it?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 10,921 ✭✭✭✭Pigman II


    I was looking forward to this one but I've got to be honest and say that it's not a very good movie at all. Everything about it from start to (esp) end is implausable (method, characters, situation and solution) - all which doesn't really do you any favours if you're trying to make a thriller.
    was sean bean in on it?

    No it was just
    the Marshall and the stewardess, no one else


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,082 ✭✭✭lostexpectation


    Pigman II wrote:
    I was looking forward to this one but I've got to be honest and say that it's not a very good movie at all. Everything about it from start to (esp) end is implausable (method, characters, situation and solution) - all which doesn't really do you any favours if you're trying to make a thriller.



    No it was just
    the Marshall and the stewardess, no one else
    well he seemed to stall the fbi from getting her to identify someone else, like it could have been him?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,489 ✭✭✭Clintons Cat


    might as well have been called Panic Room 2 with the tagline-"Tighter Crawl Spaces-Bigger Explosions! Brilliant!!!"-Paul Ross.

    A very poor 4/10 or possibly a 6


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,585 ✭✭✭honru


    This film had a ridiculous amount of plot holes, which just added to the comedic value. :v:

    Hardly anything special at the end of the day.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,108 ✭✭✭Lirange


    Excellent points Rebel. Scarcely conceivable and manipulative plot devices.

    Panic Room, where Jodie plays a similiar role ... was much better than this.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,942 ✭✭✭missingtime


    Worst movie I've seen in a long time. And I sat through Casanova.
    Unbelievably predictable and unoriginal. I couldn't watch the ending when she walks through the crowd. Soooo corny. Thank god i didn't pay for it that would have pissed me off even more.

    0/10


Advertisement