Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

The Interconnector is the Answer

  • 05-09-2004 10:47am
    #1
    Closed Accounts Posts: 173 ✭✭


    Please sign this on-line petition for a proper underground rail network for Dublin and Leinster, which will cost €700 million less that the RPA's Airport Metro:

    www.extendthedart.com

    then pass it on to everybody you know.

    Thanks,
    Platform11 - Ireland's National Rail Users Organisation


Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,788 ✭✭✭MrPudding


    Done. Good luck.

    MrP


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,111 ✭✭✭tba


    is it just me or is this plan a little biased.

    The area north of the river is being completely ignored.

    I would sign it if it pushed for the addition of more stations along the existing north side rail line and the introduction of a ring rail.

    As the plan stands at the moment Im afraid I wouldnt support it.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 173 ✭✭P11 Comms


    tba wrote:
    is it just me or is this plan a little biased.

    The area north of the river is being completely ignored.

    I would sign it if it pushed for the addition of more stations along the existing north side rail line and the introduction of a ring rail.

    As the plan stands at the moment Im afraid I wouldnt support it.

    This is stage one. The orbital rail line is only possible if the Interconnector goes ahead: www.platform11.org/dconnector.html

    The only bias out there is the Government not wanting to spend money on public transport - this is the nearest thing to making it impossible for them to say no. This is the best offer you are going to get, believe me.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 173 ✭✭P11 Comms


    Victor,

    Would there be any chance of this petition/thread being crossposted to other boards.ie groups, as its significance is beyond just us lot who are interested in transport?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,111 ✭✭✭tba


    Ah good

    It is a bit hard to see that on the website and I had a good long look, are you involved in the organisation p11, cause if you are I would suggest making the whole scheme obvious, not just piecemeal components like this interconnector, be it stage one or whatever.

    I think that there is some very good thinking in here paticulaurly the changing of pearse into a regional staion. I personally think that there is room for both schemes, in a certain fashion.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,011 ✭✭✭sliabh


    Platform11 I know you have declared your role as PRO for Platform11, can you tell me if you are an employee of Irish Rail?

    Just curious


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 629 ✭✭✭enterprise


    I can tell you he is not.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,933 ✭✭✭thejollyrodger


    I would like to vote for the Metro. Is there a petition on P11 where i can do that?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1 T Mr


    You can build the WRC the €700m saved


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,569 ✭✭✭maxheadroom


    I would like to vote for the Metro. Is there a petition on P11 where i can do that?
    Doubtful, given that they don't support the project (at least, not until the interconnector is built)


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 173 ✭✭P11 Comms


    sliabh wrote:
    Platform11 I know you have declared your role as PRO for Platform11, can you tell me if you are an employee of Irish Rail?

    Just curious


    I am the Communications Officer. Never been employed by IE/CIE or any semi state agency/government department in my life.

    Jollyroger: Platform11 does not support the current Airport Metro plans unless radical changes are made to the present government plans to include Swords and better integration into the current rail network as outlined in our consulatation with the Oireactas Transport Committee on the matter.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,933 ✭✭✭thejollyrodger


    I heard the Metro is going in front of the cabinet in the next few weeks and it looks like it will get the green light. Included is a stop at Swords.

    They should build the interconnetor as well.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 629 ✭✭✭enterprise


    How many times have we heard "will be brought before Cabinet within weeks" from Brennan's mouth???

    Until the digging actually starts on either the Interconnector or Metro then I will know its started, not before then.

    Plus I would go for the "Interconnector" as its offers the best rail solution for Dublin. And as P11 has stated before, we already have a metro (p.s. Its called the DART in case nobody knows).


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 78,580 ✭✭✭✭Victor


    P11 Comms wrote:
    Would there be any chance of this petition/thread being crossposted to other boards.ie groups, as its significance is beyond just us lot who are interested in transport?
    Where do you want it? I'm not sure how many other places are relevant.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,741 ✭✭✭jd


    Victor wrote:
    Where do you want it? I'm not sure how many other places are relevant.

    Maybe Green Issues, and perhaps Business and finance.
    Maybe the east regional board.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,457 ✭✭✭dmeehan


    I have only gotten 2 replys from the list of TD's and ministers listed on the email
    - one of which was an email from a TD who shall remain nameless stating that s/he would only correspsond with email submissions who provide a full postal address or land line telephone number. Doesn't that defeat the whole purpose of email??


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,011 ✭✭✭sliabh


    dmeehan wrote:
    I have only gotten 2 replys from the list of TD's and ministers listed on the email
    - one of which was an email from a TD who shall remain nameless stating that s/he would only correspsond with email submissions who provide a full postal address or land line telephone number. Doesn't that defeat the whole purpose of email??
    It would be par for the course with politicians and email. I have mailed my TDs and city councillors occasionally. With the 4 councillors the Green and Labour ones responded, no reply from Fine Gael and Fianna Fail. Of my 4 TDs (I live in dublin South East) I got responses from Labour and the PD's, nothing from the Greens or Fianna Fail. So on average 50%.

    In general they have been receptive to what I have sent it, however the TDs all responded with postal material. Probably because they get various allowances for that, even though the email would be free!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 344 ✭✭gom


    I had a look at the plan and I'm not in favour.
    WHile you do say that it is no doubt cheaper than proposed plans in front of government It is not nearly as comprehensive.

    I'm in favour of a integrated network. Not an add on. The DART is not a viable means of transport for the majority of DUbliners in my opinion. An underground is the way to go. It is extremely expensive, time consuming to build and a legal loophole in many ways but a Fully functioning, Fully servicing underground metro with numerous lines in DUblin is far better than an add on to the DART. For this I would accept a 25 year rise of 5% in my INcome tax...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,569 ✭✭✭maxheadroom


    gom wrote:
    I had a look at the plan and I'm not in favour.
    WHile you do say that it is no doubt cheaper than proposed plans in front of government It is not nearly as comprehensive.

    What? You do realise that the "Platform for change", multi line, integrated metro system is not what's being discussed here, right? The RPA metro is a single line, running from stephen's green to the airport (and possibly on out to Swords) with no interchanges with heavy rail at all. How is that "comprehensive"?
    gom wrote:
    I'm in favour of a integrated network. Not an add on. The DART is not a viable means of transport for the majority of DUbliners in my opinion. An underground is the way to go. It is extremely expensive, time consuming to build and a legal loophole in many ways but a Fully functioning, Fully servicing underground metro with numerous lines in DUblin is far better than an add on to the DART. For this I would accept a 25 year rise of 5% in my INcome tax...

    I would assume that the DART is not a viable means of transport for so many people because it goes nowhere near them. The interconnector will be underground in the city centre. Note that the RPA metro will be a surface line for most of its course too.

    And once again, a fully uderground metro with numerous lines is unfortunately not on the cards here. Unfortunatel, the politicians are perfectly happy letting everyone believe it is so they will love the idea of any metro, even if its a single, relatively short, and extremely overpriced line.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,011 ✭✭✭sliabh


    I would assume that the DART is not a viable means of transport for so many people because it goes nowhere near them.
    To be fair the interconnecor will not really change this. It's more about tying together existing parts of the heavy rail network and making it more attractive to people living along the line than bringing rail to areas of the city where there is none at the moment.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 756 ✭✭✭Zaph0d


    gom wrote:
    I'm in favour of a integrated network. Not an add on. The DART is not a viable means of transport for the majority of DUbliners in my opinion. An underground is the way to go. It is extremely expensive, time consuming to build and a legal loophole in many ways but a Fully functioning, Fully servicing underground metro with numerous lines in DUblin is far better than an add on to the DART. For this I would accept a 25 year rise of 5% in my INcome tax...
    Supporting a proposal that is not up for consideration is equivalent to abstention.

    It may be unclear that the two proposals being considered by government both involve underground railway sections and so could both be the first step in a Dublin metro network. The question is which should be built first.

    It would be nice to build both and it would be nice to raise income tax by 5% and build a 12.5 billion euro citywide network. Do you think this is likely?

    It is also very possible that the government will opt to do nothing or choose one plan and run out of money after several years of EIS, public enquiries and appeals.

    I think Gom shows up a flaw in P11's marketing. At first glance, it appears that the choice is between an underground metro system and an overground DART extension. People think "feck it, let's spend the money and get the underground". Will the cabinet members throw more than a first glance at this?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,569 ✭✭✭maxheadroom


    sliabh wrote:
    To be fair the interconnecor will not really change this. It's more about tying together existing parts of the heavy rail network and making it more attractive to people living along the line than bringing rail to areas of the city where there is none at the moment.

    Well, it will change the number of people with access to a high frequency, fast service. It will also serve a much larger catchment area than the RPA metro.

    It also provides a very viable startying point for new DART lines (I'd still like to see a northwest - southwest cross city line...)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,042 ✭✭✭Metrobest


    The interconnector isn't the only answer. To get the 'answer' we need a situation in which 90+ percent of Dublin is linked by rail. That's the only way to reduce traffic in Dublin. Don't let anyone say otherwise.

    Also for the entire Northside of Dublin, the Interconnector provides a lot more questions than answers. Question: How long will a jorney from Sutton to Lansdowne, or Clontarf to Connolly, or Clonsilla to Raheny take post-Interconnector? Answer: a lot longer!

    Supporters of the Interconnector are determined to create an 'Interconnector versus Airport Metro'' choice. Neither projects delivers value for money; neither project does anything for the vast majority of Dubliners. We need a third option. A metro that links transport and people hubs in Dublin. And yes, it's going to cost more money than an Interconnector, or an Airport Metro. What about it. The fact is, it's badly needed. An extra couple of million to build a decent metro network will reap value-for-money benefits the two ''on the table'' projects can only dream of.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,050 ✭✭✭✭murphaph


    I'm sure nobody would suggest that the interconnector or the RPA proposal would solve all the problems even if both were built tomorrow. The interconnector undoubtedly provides the better start point for rapid transit network expansion however. The reality is that these are the only 2 proposals before government.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,011 ✭✭✭sliabh


    murphaph wrote:
    The reality is that these are the only 2 proposals before government.
    Is the Interconnector really before govenrment? The only one I have heard of being discussed for approval is the airport metro project.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,221 ✭✭✭BrianD


    Like the Luas, the interconnector is not the answer but a part of the solution.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,788 ✭✭✭MrPudding


    dmeehan wrote:
    I have only gotten 2 replys from the list of TD's and ministers listed on the email
    - one of which was an email from a TD who shall remain nameless stating that s/he would only correspsond with email submissions who provide a full postal address or land line telephone number. Doesn't that defeat the whole purpose of email??

    I got the same mail. Pathetic. I have also received about 15 other replies from others on the list. Canned I would imagine but at least they replied.

    MrP


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 173 ✭✭P11 Comms


    Airport Metro versus Interconnector Comparative Analysis here:

    http://www.platform11.org/comparison.html


Advertisement