Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

So was this an aprils fools?

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,367 ✭✭✭✭Sleepy


    It doesn't matter what day of the year it is, they're always fools :rolleyes:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,264 ✭✭✭✭Hobbes


    I meant the PDF file you muppet.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,274 ✭✭✭Monty - the one and only


    sleepy, read the charter before I get annoyed.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,367 ✭✭✭✭Sleepy


    Sorry Monty, Hobbes I hadn't read the pdf, just the article but having done so:
    Why did the Administration think it had 7 months to develop policy?
    • We made a point of ignoring as long as possible anything that was
    recommended to us by the Clinton Administration.
    You say the Administration was developing a tougher policy. Absent 9/11,
    why do you think it would have been more successful?
    • Because everything we say is always true.

    I think it's safe to assume it's an April Fools.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,446 ✭✭✭Havelock


    It may not have been. Clarks alligations would be very dangerous to the white house, espically as you notice the adminstartions run to deal with it asap. If they were nothing, they'd ignore it.


  • Advertisement
Advertisement