Clear some space on your desks People

tba · 30-03-2004 12:47pm #1

Anybody got 92" free on their desktops and 15,000 euros free i their pockets?

website here

damnyanks · 30-03-2004 11:30pm

Why would you need that heh

Zaph · 30-03-2004 11:33pm

There's a difference between needing one and wanting one. I definitely don't need one, but I definitely do want one, although it may require moving to a larger pad to accommodate it.

Guy:Incognito · 30-03-2004 11:43pm

WOW

that is all

McGyver · 31-03-2004 9:32am

bloody hell!

That is huge!

One question...why not put three more display cards in your PC and buy three more monitors? Woundn't that be cheaper? Or do PC's only support a max of two monitors?

Ross

leeroybrown · 31-03-2004 9:34am

I can only imagine the ergo strain moving your neck from side to side all day

Caliden · 31-03-2004 3:13pm

would piss you off too playing fps as your enemy would be where one monitor ends and another finishes.

feking kewl tho

AdMMM · 31-03-2004 5:01pm

rofl!

BloodBath · 31-03-2004 5:27pm

Certain graphics cards support more than one monitor. Mine supports up to 3 so be no good for this then

. You'd be looking at forking out another 1000-1500 on a graphics card that supports 4 monitors.

BloodBath

satchmo · 31-03-2004 6:07pm

Not really, just get an AGP GeforceFX and a PCI GeforceFX - it wouldnt cost more than 500 quid, and if you're going to be spending 15 grand anyway....!

weemcd · 31-03-2004 8:33pm

Originally posted by Jazz
Not really, just get an AGP GeforceFX and a PCI GeforceFX - it wouldnt cost more than 500 quid, and if you're going to be spending 15 grand anyway....!

i know your not being serious. but that combination would be awfull, you could have one screen at 125fps and the other at 80 or so, really **** up yor aim

Woden · 31-03-2004 10:34pm

tomshardware showed a nice function for multi monitors for playing battlelfiend where one was used for the game and the other had the scoreboard to save you having to tab it up, such a function does not exist but i thought it was cool

TheC0CK · 31-03-2004 11:59pm

That would just irritate me. No way! I do not like it!

MrPinK · 01-04-2004 12:04am

I'm still pissed at that company for bumping up the price of their Hollywood Silver laptops by $800 just a few weeks before I planned on getting mine.

satchmo · 01-04-2004 12:08am

Originally posted by weemcd
i know your not being serious. but that combination would be awfull, you could have one screen at 125fps and the other at 80 or so, really **** up yor aim

Well people do use multimonitors for things other than playing first person shooters you know :rolleyes: Besides, there are only a couple of games which actually support multiple monitors so your case would never really happen in the first place.... in those that do have multimon support the frambuffer is being updated only once every frame and spread across the monitors, so it would be limited by the slowest card and give the same maximum framerate to both images.

(Oh and if your aim gets ****ed up at 80fps I think all you need is alot more practise!)