Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Is this crap?

  • 25-02-2004 9:40pm
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,941 ✭✭✭


    Microsoft Windows [Version 5.2.3790]
    (C) Copyright 1985-2003 Microsoft Corp.

    C:\Documents and Settings\Administrator>ping www.bo

    Pinging www.boards.ie [82.195.131.128] with 32 byte

    Reply from 82.195.131.128: bytes=32 time=62ms TTL=5
    Reply from 82.195.131.128: bytes=32 time=57ms TTL=5
    Reply from 82.195.131.128: bytes=32 time=57ms TTL=5
    Reply from 82.195.131.128: bytes=32 time=67ms TTL=5

    Ping statistics for 82.195.131.128:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% l
    Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 57ms, Maximum = 67ms, Average = 60ms


Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,584 ✭✭✭✭Creamy Goodness


    Microsoft Windows XP [Version 5.1.2600]
    (C) Copyright 1985-2001 Microsoft Corp.

    ping www.boards.ie

    Pinging www.boards.ie [82.195.131.128] with 32 bytes of data:

    Reply from 82.195.131.128: bytes=32 time=26ms TTL=56
    Reply from 82.195.131.128: bytes=32 time=26ms TTL=56
    Reply from 82.195.131.128: bytes=32 time=25ms TTL=56
    Reply from 82.195.131.128: bytes=32 time=117ms TTL=56

    Ping statistics for 82.195.131.128:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
    Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 25ms, Maximum = 117ms, Average = 48ms


    that's on isdn 64k


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,941 ✭✭✭pclancy


    Im on eircom dsll 1mbps?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,943 ✭✭✭Mutant_Fruit


    Its not that bad. Its a bit high, but you'll only feel the difference in games.

    Ideally you'd be pinging here in under 30ms (roughly).


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,357 ✭✭✭secret_squirrel


    thats a wierd version of Xp you're running there pclancy.

    btw my pings (On 512k IOL BB in dublin) are around the 25-26ms mark


  • Subscribers Posts: 3,703 ✭✭✭TCP/IP


    i get an average of 23ms on Eircom RADSL nothing beats it


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,943 ✭✭✭Mutant_Fruit


    Nothing beats it eh? Look at these:

    Ping statistics for 82.195.131.128:
    Packets: Sent = 100, Received = 100, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
    Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 3ms, Maximum = 14ms, Average = 5ms
    Control-Break


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,584 ✭✭✭✭Creamy Goodness


    Originally posted by secret_squirrel
    thats a wierd version of Xp you're running there pclancy.

    just a thought but would the 5.2 mean your using SP2??


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 856 ✭✭✭andrew163


    they look like pings I get usually on UTV clicksilver....

    Pinging boards.ie [82.195.131.128] with 32 bytes of data:

    Reply from 82.195.131.128: bytes=32 time=75ms TTL=54
    Reply from 82.195.131.128: bytes=32 time=62ms TTL=54
    Reply from 82.195.131.128: bytes=32 time=61ms TTL=54
    Reply from 82.195.131.128: bytes=32 time=62ms TTL=54

    Ping statistics for 82.195.131.128:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
    Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 61ms, Maximum = 75ms, Average = 65ms


    bleh...not great but not terrible either


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 17,068 Mod ✭✭✭✭Gonzo


    eircom radsl.. my pings are ok but other ppl on the same network can get lower than me, does usb or eternet make a difference to pings? im on usb.

    Pinging www.boards.ie [82.195.131.128] with 32 bytes of data:

    Reply from 82.195.131.128: bytes=32 time=28ms TTL=58
    Reply from 82.195.131.128: bytes=32 time=27ms TTL=58
    Reply from 82.195.131.128: bytes=32 time=29ms TTL=58
    Reply from 82.195.131.128: bytes=32 time=25ms TTL=58

    Ping statistics for 82.195.131.128:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
    Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 25ms, Maximum = 29ms, Average = 27ms


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,941 ✭✭✭pclancy


    Free pack of floppie disks for the person to correctly identify my version of windows (and why)


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,941 ✭✭✭pclancy


    is dere anythin i can do to get the ping down? want to start playing cs and bf1942 amoungst others online again soon.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,439 ✭✭✭ando


    plancy your on Adsl. Thats as low as the pings will go as interleaving is on for Adsl. Interleaving is at a minimum setting for Radsl, thats why Radsl gets better pings
    Originally posted by TCP/IP
    i get an average of 23ms on Eircom RADSL nothing beats it

    ping www.boards.ie

    Pinging www.boards.ie [82.195.131.128] with 32 bytes of data:

    Reply from 82.195.131.128: bytes=32 time=20ms TTL=58
    Reply from 82.195.131.128: bytes=32 time=19ms TTL=58
    Reply from 82.195.131.128: bytes=32 time=21ms TTL=58
    Reply from 82.195.131.128: bytes=32 time=21ms TTL=58

    Ping statistics for 82.195.131.128:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
    Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 19ms, Maximum = 21ms, Average = 20ms


    har har :ninja:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,013 ✭✭✭SirLemonhead


    Originally posted by pclancy
    Free pack of floppie disks for the person to correctly identify my version of windows (and why)

    I presume it's Windows Server 2003? because...you're running a server, or you got bored and decided to experiment with a copy you 'aquired' ? :p


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,698 ✭✭✭IrishMike


    Originally posted by pclancy
    Free pack of floppie disks for the person to correctly identify my version of windows (and why)

    server 2003
    god only knows why u are running that though

    ps u can hang on 2 the floppies


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,013 ✭✭✭SirLemonhead


    Originally posted by IrishMike
    server 2003
    god only knows why u are running that though

    ps u can hang on 2 the floppies

    what floppies? beat you to it mate :cool:


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,357 ✭✭✭secret_squirrel


    my slightly more off the wall guesses would have been XP media center edition or an alpha of Longhorn - good job my pc aint got a floppy drive!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,941 ✭✭✭pclancy


    something bout floppies makes me so nostalgic. One of the last remaining parts of the pc not to have changed in what? 15 years? They're still flimsy unreliable feckers tho!!!!!

    Runnin server 03 cos its actually running much better then 2k ever did for us! Plus it came with the MS action pack so why not use it? Obviously its full of flaws and security holes etc etc but sure what microsoft product isnt when you think bout it!!!!!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 741 ✭✭✭longword


    Originally posted by Mutant_Fruit
    Nothing beats it eh? Look at these:

    Ping statistics for 82.195.131.128:
    Packets: Sent = 100, Received = 100, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
    Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 3ms, Maximum = 14ms, Average = 5ms
    Control-Break
    $ ping -c 100 -i 0.2 -q www.boards.ie
    PING www.boards.ie (82.195.131.128) 56(84) bytes of data.

    --- www.boards.ie ping statistics ---
    100 packets transmitted, 100 received, 0% packet loss, time 20791ms
    rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.153/0.247/0.341/0.048 ms

    I win!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 28 tek


    OMG whatta f*ck is that ?
    I reckon u've got one of those sweet government fininced fibre pipes plugged rite up ur ....err usb port or ethernet


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,464 ✭✭✭daveyjoe


    Originally posted by longword
    $ ping -c 100 -i 0.2 -q www.boards.ie
    PING www.boards.ie (82.195.131.128) 56(84) bytes of data.

    --- www.boards.ie ping statistics ---
    100 packets transmitted, 100 received, 0% packet loss, time 20791ms
    rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.153/0.247/0.341/0.048 ms

    I win!
    Ahhh! any chance of a screenshot, to proove your stupidly low pings.
    (What connection are you on?)


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 741 ✭✭✭longword


    Lasers. The secret is lasers.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,464 ✭✭✭daveyjoe


    Originally posted by longword
    Lasers. The secret is lasers.

    hehe, I still don't believe you


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 741 ✭✭✭longword


    Originally posted by daveyjoe
    hehe, I still don't believe you
    Of course not, but a screenshot won't help and the lasers are infra-red, and the housings are well out of sight so no piccies of those either.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,357 ✭✭✭secret_squirrel


    More importantly can you d/l several terabytes of pron for me and burn them to dvd ;)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,943 ✭✭✭Mutant_Fruit


    100 packets transmitted, 100 received, 0% packet loss, time 20791ms

    me wonders...


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 741 ✭✭✭longword


    Originally posted by Mutant_Fruit
    me wonders...
    -i 0.2 means send one packet every 0.2 seconds rather than the usual 1.0 seconds.


Advertisement