Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

[Article] California wins first anti-spam judgement

  • 25-10-2003 7:27pm
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 78,580 ✭✭✭✭


    haha :D

    http://home.eircom.net/content/reuters/worldnews/1749237?view=Eircomnet
    California wins first anti-spam judgement
    From:Reuters
    Saturday, 25th October, 2003
    By Barbara Grady

    SAN FRANCISCO (Reuters) - California has won its first anti-spam judgement after a court fined a marketing firm $2 million (1.2 million pounds) for sending out millions of unsolicited e-mails telling people how to spam, the state's attorney general said.

    Attorney General Bill Lockyer brought the case against PW Marketing of Los Angeles County and its owners Paul Willis and Claudia Griffin in 2002 under a 1998 state anti-spam law. The law was strengthened last month to make it easier to sue spammers.

    Lockyer's spokesman Tom Dressler said while this case was decided under the original statute, the attorney general's office expects in the future it will be easier to try cases under the updated, tougher law.

    PW Marketing and Willis and Griffin were charged with sending out millions of e-mails advertising "how to" guides on spamming and long lists of e-mail addresses.

    The judgement, which Lockyer said will be the model for future spam injunctions, forbids PW Marketing from sending unsolicited commercial e-mail, accessing computers that belong to other people without their permission and disguising its identity by sending e-mails that appear to originate from a different address.

    The injunction also forbids Willis and Griffin for 10 years from owning or managing any business that advertises over the Internet.

    The tougher measures in the new statute include allowing individuals to sue spammers and collect damages of up to $1,000 per e-mail. Another provision forbids sending unsolicited e-mail advertisements unless recipients give prior permission to receive such e-mails.

    The old law made it illegal to send to recipients who had specified they did not want to receive e-mail advertising. It also required senders to provide a phone number or valid e-mail address for opting out on each e-mail -- something the company did not do, the attorney general's office said.


Advertisement