Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Eircom Staff Briefed, no refunds for Porn Dialler Victims.

  • 21-10-2003 11:03am
    #1
    Closed Accounts Posts: 6,143 ✭✭✭


    Some of you may have come across Browser Hijacking software. Eircom certainly have so they created a special Call Band , Band 13 (or the Rest of World band as they delicately called it :D ) into which they grouped the Porn Dialler countries and only the Porn Dialler countries and then upped the charge for ringing them to €2.25 a minute at all times. Here is a Recent Example of the damage they cause.

    The number of complaints about these and the bills they hit people with is apparently staggering at the moment, many of the Browser Hijackers (they typically appear in PoPup windows) leave the user no way out, if they click stupidly YES in the popup window they get a Porn Dialler and if they 'cleverly' Click NO they get a Porn Dialler anyway. They are not knowingly installed and cost MORE than a Premium 15xx line which is heavily regulated and restricted to 25 mins max call length. Some self install like the Blaster worm.

    Eircom profits on their revenues to places such as Vanuatu , Diego Garcia and Sao Tomé is now well over €1 m a Month. A special team has been put in place to deal with the inevitable billing query escalations. If woman rings this team she is told her husband or boyfriend was surfing for porn....not true in many if not most of these cases. If a man rings they blame the wife, if a couple have kids they blame the kids. etc. In actual fact it could have been installed with no user intervention like the Blaster worm but Eircom, as a matter of policy, tries to embarass the victims into paying by blaming other memeber of their household for something that THEY DID NOT DO ! Apart from the cost they often leave accusations flying about for months.

    Band 13 should be an OPT IN band only, if you really need to ring these countries you will know why in advance. Then you can ring Eircom and opt yourself in if you are the account holder.

    As the USO is under its final (mini) review before becoming fixed in stone for the next few years, you should send your Comments to Comreg on or before friday the 24/10

    info@comreg.ie

    cc to:

    sinead.devey@comreg.ie

    Subject = Control Of Expenditure Section in Eircom USO , Browser Hijack Software and Band 13


    Dear Comreg.

    Please do something about these Band 13 countries, they should not be normally available to be called unless the account holder has knowingly opted IN to ring them . Eircom has rigged its charges at €3.61 a minute to these countries which are well known Browser Hijack destinations without exception. Persons are incurring staggering bills because of Eircom greed and Microsofts buggy software in combination.

    Eircom invidiously charge more to these countries than they do to any Premium 15xx number. Comreg has so far failed to bring this matter under the Control of Expenditure section of the USO or to take into account the damage being caused to families and individuals...not just financially.... by these diallers. Families are left to deal with the cost and also with recriminations about surfing Porn sites where NO SUCH activity took place. The Premium number regulator (Regtel) caps calls to 15xx numbers at €25 max while these Band 13 countries are unrestricted length calls and actually cost more to call per minute. It is possible to incur a charge similar to the CAP imposed by your fellow regulator in a matter of 7 minutes, day or night, to these Band 13 numbers.

    Browser Hijacks are generally carried out unknown to the victim. Eircom then have a policy in place whereby they accuse the victim of indulging in unsavoury activities. They will not refund the call costs incurred by the victims. This must stop now. In your current review of the USO you may do so under the control of expenditure principle.

    I expect a principled response from Comreg.

    Yours Sincerely


    J Public esq.

    M


«1

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 68,317 ✭✭✭✭seamus


    Originally posted by Muck
    A special team has been put in place to deal with the inevitable billing query escalations. If woman rings this team she is told her husband or boyfriend was surfing for porn....not true in many if not most cases. If a man rings they blame the wife, if a couple have kids they blame the kids. etc. In actual fact it could have been installed with no user intervention like the Blaster worm but Eircom tries to embarass the victims into paying.
    Have we confirmation of this...? Let's not go down the lawsuit route :)

    Personally, I would think that the people are just unlucky, and no, eircom has no responsibility to relieve them of their burden, but any company with any sense of customer service would make some sort of gesture of goodwill. I'm sure there are plenty of poor souls with hundreds or even thousands of euros worth of calls on their account. Vodafone and other companies actually freeze accounts if they notice anomalies - Hundreds of euros of calls in a week when the average bill is €50/month for example - so the customer has to ring in to confirm they know that they're creating these huge bills.
    But of course, this is eircom.

    I would also urge everyone to email Comreg on this matter.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,143 ✭✭✭spongebob


    The Eircom Official Safe Surfing page is Here and contains a link to software which is supposed to protect the Family and keep y'all safe, that Filtering Software page leads Here

    None of the Programs on that page will stop a Porn dialler from Installing, safe surfing me arse :( , who wrote this watered down bilge.

    Firewalls and Anti Virus programs are normally unable to stop Porn Diallers even if both are spanking new and bang up to date with their patches.

    The only software that can usually deal with them is stuff like Spybot Search and Destroy and Adaware or other Trojan spotting software which should be installed on your Box in ADDITION to

    1. A Good firewall
    2. A GOOD antivirus program and
    3. A Content checker for kids such as Netnanny

    M


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,739 ✭✭✭BigEejit


    Thank God I'm on broadband .... not a modem in sight..:cool:

    I have however sent an email to comreg wrt the scummy practices by €irc*nts...


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 76 ✭✭Krouc


    Its revenue for the rat or whatever they are now. They love it.
    Steal from the rich, poor, stupid or unlucky, they dont discriminate.

    As for blaming the Customer, that is policy.

    And anyone that has ever inserted an Eircom-net Cd will know all about Browser Hijacking.

    Krouc


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,143 ✭✭✭spongebob


    Eircom charge €3.61 to those countries at all times. By simply inserting the Vartec access code in your long distance prefix in Dial Up Networking you will only be charged €1.30 a minute on average if you feel the need to go to those sites. Most premium rate calls are capped at €25 which is what Eircom charge for a 7 minute browser hijack....see Here . Thats €216 an Hour !

    There is no evening or weekend rate , sorry.

    M


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 78,580 ✭✭✭✭Victor


    I thought that they had already (2 years ago?) made these places opt-in only?

    [edit]

    http://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showthread.php?postid=601587#post601587

    [/edit]


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 627 ✭✭✭eoinm1


    E-mail sent

    Thanks Muck for the cut and paste job.

    Eóin


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,739 ✭✭✭BigEejit


    Originally posted by Victor
    I thought that they had already (2 years ago?) made these places opt-in only?
    [edit]
    http://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showthread.php?postid=601587#post601587
    [/edit]

    right ... I read that thread and I'm none the wiser ... all I saw was [edit]people arguing vociferously (apologies to anyone who may have felt slighted)[/edit] .... so... is band 13 opt in now or not?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,143 ✭✭✭spongebob


    No, they are always turned on for everybody whether you want them or not. Eircom will charge you €30 for each country you block and €5 a month EXTRA line rental.

    M


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,739 ✭✭✭BigEejit


    Originally posted by Muck
    No, they are always turned on for everybody whether you want them or not. Eircom will charge you €30 for each country you block and €5 a month EXTRA line rental.

    M
    the dirty ****ing miserable ****s .... what are the bets the other dirty ****ing miserable ****s that are supposed to be regulating them wont do a tap .....


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,726 ✭✭✭✭DMC


    Ah yes, the Father Paddy and mammy thread. :D

    Its still opt out, and always will be. Eircom dont offer a resticted phone service, you can call any number you like, you make the restrictions if you need them.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,733 ✭✭✭pete


    Eircom dont offer a resticted phone service

    All well and good until they started deliberately charging more to route calls to these countries - at which point it could be argued they became complicit in the whole sorry mess.
    you can call any number you like, you make the restrictions if you need them.

    So glad we live in a society with absolutely no need for regulations, laws, restrictions or any concept of societal responsibility.

    So glad.

    Yessirrree.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,188 ✭✭✭Ripwave


    Originally posted by Muck
    The number of complaints about these and the bills they hit people with is apparently staggering at the moment, many of the Browser Hijackers (they typically appear in PoPup windows) leave the user no way out, if they click stupidly YES in the popup window they get a Porn Dialler and if they 'cleverly' Click NO they get a Porn Dialler anyway. They are not knowingly installed and cost MORE than a Premium 15xx line which is heavily regulated and restricted to 25 mins max call length. Some self install like the Blaster worm.
    Purely as a matter of interest, has anyone ever seen one of these on a site that wasn't obviously "dodgy"?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 29,473 ✭✭✭✭Our man in Havana


    I have a solution.

    If someone dials a Band 13 country, they get a recording from eircom advising them that the call costs €3 per minute. The caller has the option to hang up or continue with the call.

    No need to give eircom €30 to bar the calls.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,726 ✭✭✭✭DMC


    Originally posted by Muck
    Some of you may have come across Browser Hijacking software. Eircom certainly have so they created a special Call Band , Band 13 (or the Rest of World band as they delicately called it :D ) into which they grouped the Porn Dialler countries and only the Porn Dialler countries and then upped the charge for ringing them to €2.25 a minute at all times. Here is a Recent Example of the damage they cause.

    The number of complaints about these and the bills they hit people with is apparently staggering at the moment, many of the Browser Hijackers (they typically appear in PoPup windows) leave the user no way out, if they click stupidly YES in the popup window they get a Porn Dialler and if they 'cleverly' Click NO they get a Porn Dialler anyway. They are not knowingly installed and cost MORE than a Premium 15xx line which is heavily regulated and restricted to 25 mins max call length. Some self install like the Blaster worm.

    Eircom profits on their revenues to places such as Vanuatu , Diego Garcia and Sao Tomé is now well over €1 m a Month. A special team has been put in place to deal with the inevitable billing query escalations. If woman rings this team she is told her husband or boyfriend was surfing for porn....not true in many if not most of these cases. If a man rings they blame the wife, if a couple have kids they blame the kids. etc. In actual fact it could have been installed with no user intervention like the Blaster worm but Eircom, as a matter of policy, tries to embarass the victims into paying by blaming other memeber of their household for something that THEY DID NOT DO ! Apart from the cost they often leave accusations flying about for months.

    hmmm €1m a month, eh? From where in the sky did ye pull that figure from, Muck? :D

    Have you thought that Eircom have Band 13 in place for far off Pacific and Indian Ocean locations, that can only be reached by satellite phone? They are dear places to ring, because they are far removed places. And thats why the pron dialler people choose these places to dial to.

    The price could be less, for sure.
    In the UK, a 5 minute daytime call to Diego Garcia is £6.76 or €9.70, the eircom equivilent is €18.03

    As for the porn diallers, they got them on the PC because mammy/daddy/kids have been naughty. They've just been niave/dumb. Take the medicine.

    TBH, your mail to Comreg is a rant, and it just looks like a someone who has been stung by a porn dialler.

    This is a thread calling for Eircom to be Big Brother and Mammy all at once. Wow. :D

    And 1550 calls are not capped at €25, AIUI, if the call goes beyond €25, if there is a live person at the other end, they must inform the caller that its gone beyond that, around 30 mins.

    To add on Pete's comment, did I mention society? This is a phone call, not traffic lights! :) I said in this thread and the one last year, its user opt out, they dont restrict the number you dial, unless you ask them to.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 159 ✭✭molinaalexis


    www.lavasoft.de

    A nice Ad-aware

    What is Ad-aware?
    Ad-aware is THE award winning, multi-trackware detection and removal utility (designed for Windows 98 / 98SE / ME / NT40 / 2000 / XP Home / XP Pro) that will comprehensively scan your memory, registry, hard, removable and optical drives for known Datamining, aggressive advertising, Parasites, Scumware, Keyloggers, selected traditional Trojans, Dialers, Malware, Browser hijackers, and tracking components.

    Ad-aware will provide you with the confidence to surf the Internet knowing that your privacy will remain intact.


    Time to clean house
    Ad-aware employs a regularly updated reference file and a powerful in-depth scanning engine to place the spotlight on these risks to your privacy.
    Through use of our all-new and totally integrated Webupdate module, you can be assured that you will always have the most complete and up-to-date AntiTrackware solution on the planet!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,461 ✭✭✭Frank Grimes


    Originally posted by BigEejit
    right ... I read that thread and I'm none the wiser ... all I saw was Frank_Grimes jumping down Mucks throat about an idea he put forward .... so... is band 13 opt in now or not?
    I wasn't jumping down his throat, I just didn't agree with him. And I wasn't the only one if you read through that thread.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 97 ✭✭santalives


    If Eircom where to put restrictions on people's phones for where they could and could not dial most people in here would be in uproar saying what gives them the right to censor what i do with my phone. However when they end up with a bill due to their own niavity then they scream blue murder that they where not barred from ringing such a number. Now most people will at this point start saying that no one has a need to ring these numbers so they should be barred, however in today's multi-cultural Ireland there is actually a chance that someone would actually have to ring one of these numbers to ring home.
    If people here feel that Irish people are to niave. Maybe at that point we may have to introduce licences for both phone and computers where people have to pass a test before they are allowed use either of them.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,143 ✭✭✭spongebob


    Originally posted by DMC
    hmmm €1m a month, eh? From where in the sky did ye pull that figure from, Muck? :D
    A guy called Alan in Winback :D
    Have you thought that Eircom have Band 13 in place for far off Pacific and Indian Ocean locations, that can only be reached by satellite phone? They are dear places to ring, because they are far removed places. And thats why the pron dialler people choose these places to dial to.
    Wallis costs €0.58 a Minute through Vartec if you care to look Here , Eircom charge €3.03 MORE than Vartec. Vartec charge an AVERAGE of €1.30 to this band at all times. Thos e rates are available to ANYBODY in Ireland and bear comparison unlike your UK figures. Vartec are a lot smaller than Eircom and still make a profit on those rates.
    The price could be less, for sure.
    In the UK, a 5 minute daytime call to Diego Garcia is £6.76 or €9.70, the eircom equivilent is €18.03

    Diefo Garcia DOES NOT exist, the whole country code has been sold off to the scum. It is impossible to ring a Diego Garcian on Diego Garcia because the Brits kicked them off years ago and handed the whole island to the Yanks as a B52 base. So....what business does anyone have ringing it then, Fr. Paddy simply ain't there!
    As for the porn diallers, they got them on the PC because mammy/daddy/kids have been naughty. They've just been niave/dumb. Take the medicine.
    Frequently because they installed Eircom.Net software that had not been properly configured to deal with Active X......but I am not blaming Eircom.Net for this.
    TBH, your mail to Comreg is a rant, and it just looks like a someone who has been stung by a porn dialler.
    What would you ask Comreg, Dear Comreg , please DOUBLE the charges in Band 13 otherwise these people will never learn? Dont tell us your solution, tell Comreg. You have till friday.
    This is a thread calling for Eircom to be Big Brother and Mammy all at once. Wow. :D
    This is a thread telling Eircom to stop abusing their position as one of the dominant and certainly as the single most pervasive Credit institutions in Ireland. They have over 1 Million Credit Arrangements in place. Even capping the calls is better than the current arrangement which is totally open ended. My suggestion is opt in, you ring Biddy and Biddy turns Band 13 on. Then its Caveat Emptor, you asked for it by asking for it to be turned on.
    And 1550 calls are not capped at €25, AIUI, if the call goes beyond €25, if there is a live person at the other end, they must inform the caller that its gone beyond that, around 30 mins.
    It is not open ended, Band 13 is open ended with no warning flags. It costs MORE than any premium number ...... you may disable premium number dialling at NO extra cost at ANY time by ringing 1901.
    To add on Pete's comment, did I mention society? This is a phone call, not traffic lights! :) I said in this thread and the one last year, its user opt out, they dont restrict the number you dial, unless you ask them to.
    This is one of the sickest forms of Illegal Money Lending that there is. Then the victims are all being told that it is entirely their fault.

    Nor may you include Band 13 in the Eircom discount schemes, funny that ?

    They then have 15 days to pay in full for this unwanted credit , at least the plastic allows you to spread the pain .

    As for the morality of the whole thing Should I sign you up for a couple of Credit Cards you (probably) cannot actually get and then leave you sort out the refusals on your credit record ? I know you never asked for the Credit but what the heck :D

    Get Real!

    M


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,016 ✭✭✭✭vibe666


    Originally posted by Muck
    As for the porn diallers, they got them on the PC because mammy/daddy/kids have been naughty. They've just been niave/dumb. Take the medicine.
    Frequently because they installed Eircom.Net software that had not been properly configured to deal with Active X......but I am not blaming Eircom.Net for this.[/B]
    Eircom don' make the software, they only distribute it. I'm sure you know who makes Internet Explorer, so I'll leave it at that.

    But....

    If you really want the Rat and friends to be censoring where you call, and what you surf to make sure it's not anything that you shouldn't be doing then just watch the prices rise even further as they have to put into practice lots of new security measures (and people to watch them).

    As for the mini-dialler thing, the owner of a computer is soley responsible for what they install on it whether it's because of being a little over curious or just plain ignorant as to the dangers of the net.

    In any other activity you could think of, if the person partaking in said activity does not properly understand what they are doing due to a lack of understanding (read: ignorance) and something goes wrong the only person who is responsible for that is themselves.

    Fireworks are freely available to the public (age restrictions apply obviously), but if someone blows their hands off messing around with them it's not the fault of the person who sold it is it?

    If you really want to blame somebody then blame the governments who allow these pornsters to get away with setting up these sites and distributing the diallers. It's the lack of an international agreement on stopping these fvckers that has led to it getting so bad, not individual ISP's.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,143 ✭✭✭spongebob


    Originally posted by vibe666
    Eircom don' make the software, they only distribute it. I'm sure you know who makes Internet Explorer, so I'll leave it at that.
    The software is sent out by Eircom.Net on a CD. It is configured in a particular way :D once it installs on your PC. But anyway.
    In any other activity you could think of, if the person partaking in said activity does not properly understand what they are doing due to a lack of understanding (read: ignorance) and something goes wrong the only person who is responsible for that is themselves.
    Down at the local pharmacy one day I handed over a list of pharms including Dexedrine and MethAmphetamine. She looked at me in a most peculiar and unwarranted manner. I said YO! , I have the right to do this if I want , she picked up a phone and I simply legged it.

    I legged it because I understood, knowwhadddddImean like :D

    M


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,741 ✭✭✭jd


    Originally posted by Muck
    Originally posted by vibe666
    Eircom don' make the software, they only distribute it. I'm sure you know who makes Internet Explorer, so I'll leave it at that.
    The software is sent out by Eircom.Net on a CD. It is configured in a particular way :D once it installs on your PC. But anyway.
    M

    It's a default configuration using ieak-'cept for the branding and some favourites added to the list...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,726 ✭✭✭✭DMC


    A believable answer for everything, ah yes. True Muck style. Eircom billing data. Mmmm-hmm. Like I say when someone posts up tripe like that on the ICDG board, anonomous sources are great, arent they?

    "In the valley of the blind, the one-eyed man is king."

    I'm not standing up to eircom as regards the charges of Band 13, but I strongly believe that they, or any other phone company for that matter (you've seen BT's charges) provide a service that allows me to make a call to anywhere in the world from my phone. Your rant to Comreg is nothing less than a one-man campaign to stop denying me the freedom to dial these numbers if I wished to.

    Your (or someone you may know) computer dialled through a porn dialler to a country that exploits the fact that they are the dearest places to ring in the world, because you were not in full ownership or control of their PC. And you are rightly pissed. Your are not accepting liability because you cant control the PC. Your solution for your niaviety is to stop the USO to ring these places.

    My solution is the status quo. Yes, it could be cheaper, yes, you could ask Comreg to investigate these charges, but you cant or let you deny me the right to ring Band 13 places.
    This is one of the sickest forms of Illegal Money Lending that there is.

    Ah. if it wasnt a rant before now, it definatley is now. I don't see on the bottom of letterheads "Eircom plc, Registered Charity number 19011901" do you?

    :rolleyes:


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 29,473 ✭✭✭✭Our man in Havana


    what about using a recording advising of cost?


  • Moderators, Regional Midwest Moderators Posts: 11,183 Mod ✭✭✭✭MarkR


    You can't blame Toyota for bad driving, and you can't blame eircon for someone downloading dodgy software. I do wonder that those type of numbers aren't disabled by default, due to the adult nature of those lines...

    Btwm get off eircom! Go to UTV / Esat / get a tin can and a piece of string, anything else!

    Mark:D


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,726 ✭✭✭✭DMC


    Every house has a phone book that will say as much. It could be done. They have it for changed numbers etc.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 29,473 ✭✭✭✭Our man in Havana


    Originally posted by DMC
    Every house has a phone book that will say as much. It could be done. They have it for changed numbers etc.

    But they dont publise the costs in the same way


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,143 ✭✭✭spongebob


    Originally posted by DMC
    Every house has a phone book that will say as much. It could be done. They have it for changed numbers etc.

    So what. Eircom created Band 13 so that they could illegally extend unwanted credit at ridiculous prices. It is classi shysteriing or illegal money lending or whatever you want to call it. An opt in will sort that out.

    Had they left those countries in a band with the rest of the Third World then it would not be an issue but they selectively extracted them from the Third World band and put them in Band 13 together and hiked the prices beyond those of the most expensive premium numbers and all in the knowledge that the scum of the Internet were generating those calls for them and not THEIR customers.

    Eircom do NOT publish Tarrif information in their phone books anymore. You may get the tariff information by going to an Eircom Store except that there aren't any of those because they just sold them to Sigma.

    What IS your justification for all of that DMC , I confess that I fail to follow your overall logic on this?

    M


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 29,473 ✭✭✭✭Our man in Havana


    Question: Are the porn servers actually in these places?


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,143 ✭✭✭spongebob


    In a lot of cases there is very little behind the numbers. The scum simply want to answer a call to make money on the indial.

    In the case of Vanuatu there are a number of online casinos in the territory but in the case of Diego Garcia the call is possibly even answered in DUBLIN but you are charged for ringing ......... a non existent country that has been depopulated for 40 years.

    Generally the answer is no, the call is normally not answered by a person or device in the country that you are nominally ringing. The answering device is normally in Europe or the US

    M


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 16,659 ✭✭✭✭dahamsta


    Originally posted by jd
    It's a default configuration using ieak-'cept for the branding and some favourites added to the list...
    The IEAK can configure everything, including setting the ActiveX handler to disabled or prompt...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,574 ✭✭✭Clinical Waste


    Originally posted by Bond-James Bond
    I have a solution.

    If someone dials a Band 13 country, they get a recording from eircom advising them that the call costs €3 per minute. The caller has the option to hang up or continue with the call.

    No need to give eircom €30 to bar the calls.



    And the Porn-dialler will hang up?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,726 ✭✭✭✭DMC


    www.eircom.ie/pricing has them too.

    Short of a message saying "are you mad to ring this place??" tbh James, they can't do anymore.

    Muck,

    Right, say that you got your wish and Band 13 was opt in. Who is to say that pron diallers exploit Band 12 or 11 countries, as they would be the next dearest places to ring? Nowt.

    My justification (if I have to) is that people have to accept their own actions. If a porn dialler gets on their PC, If they are not in full control of the PC, or cant get a way of getting this off thier PC, they have learned a valuable and expensive lesson. Opting in on Band 13 is not the answer, this, in my eyes, is no longer USO and you'd deny people who dont even have PC's to direct dial these places, should they want to. As I said above, all I want is a service that allows me to make a direct dialled call to anywhere in the world from my phone and that is what I currently have.

    What would Ofcom or Oftel say to BT in this regard?

    Find out and come back to me.

    kthxbye.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,143 ✭✭✭spongebob


    You are right Adam (of course) but Eircom.Net are no more negligent than any other ISP from what see. I m not aiming at them.

    DMC. Their parent company, unlike BT or their incumbent peers, have chosen to use the extension of unwanted credit as a method to profit from this so I would like to focus clearly on their profiteering from the activities of Net Scum at the expense of their customers.

    BT have not created a special SUPER EXPENSIVE and SUPER PREMIUM band to make extra windfall profits. Oftel has no case against them.

    Add to that their loathsome practise of pointing the finger indiscriminately within families where in fairness there is no specific blame at all....in order to keep their ill gottten gains.

    M


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,726 ✭✭✭✭DMC


    Maybe they have not branded it like eircom have as "Band 12", but its still a dear or the dearest hole to ring on a BT landline.

    The fact remains that if you get a porn dialler on your PC, and it calls and you cant stop it, its still your problem.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 29,473 ✭✭✭✭Our man in Havana


    Originally posted by Clinical Waste
    And the Porn-dialler will hang up?

    No but the user would still here the recording over the speakers and then hang up.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,143 ✭✭✭spongebob


    Originally posted by DMC
    I'm not standing up to eircom as regards the charges of Band 13, but I strongly believe that they, or any other phone company for that matter (you've seen BT's charges) provide a service that allows me to make a call to anywhere in the world from my phone. Your rant to Comreg is nothing less than a one-man campaign to stop denying me the freedom to dial these numbers if I wished to.

    My solution is the status quo. Yes, it could be cheaper, yes, you could ask Comreg to investigate these charges, but you cant or let you deny me the right to ring Band 13 places.

    :rolleyes:

    :rolleyes: Ah yes, FREEEEEEEEEEEDDDDDDOOOOOOMMMMM ! sez DMC. :rolleyes:

    My position is simple but must evidently be spelt out for the slow learners again :( God !


    My suggestio sez you can ring Biddy anyyYYyytime you wish and opt in to calling Band 13 and then exercise your "freedom" .

    As it happens you must also get a pin for a 1590 number which costs less per minute than Band 13. Are you saying that PINS on 1590 numbers interfere with your Freedom too DMC. If not WHY not .....just to see if I can help steer you into the path of consistency like ?

    The Premium Number Regulator requires that PIN be there. You "strongly believe" that you have a right to ring those countries :D:D . I never said that you should be denied the right, only the right NOT to be inadvertently diverted there, read my comments please and quote where I said otherwise ?

    Band 13 may remain at the curent price. I did not say they should change it / reduce it ...........did I , read my comments please and quote where I said otherwise.

    Did I ask Comreg to "investigate" the price itself, where? Read my comments please and quote where I said it.

    No attribution without quotation in future please DMC , you have your own forum where you can do that if you wish :(

    M


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,016 ✭✭✭✭vibe666


    Originally posted by Muck
    Add to that their loathsome practise of pointing the finger indiscriminately within families where in fairness there is no specific blame at all....in order to keep their ill gottten gains.
    Are you talking about eircom or eircom.net?

    If you mean eircom.net then I happen to know for a fact that eircom.net techs are told specifically not to tell people the specifics of how these things get on their PC's, and should never say that they are specifically from visiting porn sites.

    Typically what would normally be said is, that 'these things can get on to your PC by either clicking on a link or viewing an email (not necessarily pornographic) that would then most likely without the users knowledge install something that would change the number the user is dialling.'

    If you were told differently than that and visiting porn sites was specifically mentioned than you may well have a case for defamation of character against the rat, as you know it's not always a case of specifically surfing to a site to end up with these things on your PC.

    that said, if you did there are ways of finding out these things and you'd have to submit your PC for examination, and trust me there are things on there that not even professional software can completely remove, so you better be sure about how they did get there. ;)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 68,317 ✭✭✭✭seamus


    DMC, Muck, I think you may have to agree to disagree.

    You could poke holes in eachother's arguments all night and get nowhere.

    Both of you know better than attacking the poster instead of the argument btw. :)

    btw Muck, I'll need clarification on this:
    A special team has been put in place to deal with the inevitable billing query escalations. If woman rings this team she is told her husband or boyfriend was surfing for porn....not true in many if not most of these cases. If a man rings they blame the wife, if a couple have kids they blame the kids. etc. In actual fact it could have been installed with no user intervention like the Blaster worm but Eircom, as a matter of policy, tries to embarass the victims into paying by blaming other memeber of their household for something that THEY DID NOT DO ! Apart from the cost they often leave accusations flying about for months.
    Speculation, or by official directive of managment?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,726 ✭✭✭✭DMC


    My last points on this, seamus.

    I never said that you suggust a reduction in the prices of Band 13 calls. That was my suggestion.

    By your suggestion of opting out, you are stopping me from directing dialling that number. You want to make me ring a biddy to get it turned back on, denying me the chance to direct dial that country wihout interference from my phone company. Remember, all numbers; 15xx, 18xx local and national calls are by default available, it is for you to choose what number you want blocked.
    Hell, lets return to manual exchanges and A-B coinboxes..

    As for making to play on me saying freedom, I wont go that low.
    No attribution without quotation in future please DMC

    Sure. Name your sources to see if you are not telling us porkies. But I dont think you will. Eircom billing data is sooo vague. :)


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,143 ✭✭✭spongebob


    Originally posted by seamus
    btw Muck, I'll need clarification on this:

    There is a special team within billing to handle escalations on queries that arise from Browser Hijackings where said Hijacking results in an outdial without the customers knowledge to an international number. It may be small but it exists.

    M


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 495 ✭✭The Insider


    So what do you expect them to do, refund the money?? If a customer comes on screaming and shouting saying they will bring Eircom to court that they demand a refund, what should they say to them, whatever way you look at it Muck, its the person's own fault for not controlling their own property correctly.

    What would your alternative approach to customers demanding a refund be?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,143 ✭✭✭spongebob


    Did I mention a refund either?

    I suggested a systemic non intrusive approach, remove them all from the normal international outdial set and let the account holder opt in as they see fit, if they want one Band 13 country they get them all. !

    Eircom will make its administrative overhead for an opt in back in 2 MINUTES at the rates they charge to these destinations.

    The other alternative is a fraud control system but some of these systems disconnect periodically and therefore tend to stay below the radar for some Fraud Control systems, especailly a bi-monthly billing system such as the Eircom one. Fraud control systems are supposed to snoop on your traffic, that may offend Libertarianism 101 fans such as DMC even though its there to protect him. Fraud control software benefits certain users because the heuristics may spot an odd pattern in some cases but not in others. The opt in is more straightforward and far less nosey.

    Business users also get billed monthly so they would be aware of the fraud sooner, a residential user could be clobbered for 60 days of dialling in a worst possible case. Waiting for your bill is twice as risky for a home user which is also unfair, can we therefore be billed monthly if we use the Internet or is that a bit too costly for Eircom .......to even out the risk of course.

    It begs the question......what was the worst case you ever heard of (ex or including VAT if you remember the details ) O Inside One. The worst case I personally heard of clocked up €7000 Ex Vat in 12 days or so. Most are only €500 or €600 or so, a night out in Dublin would cost ya that :D


    M


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,016 ✭✭✭✭vibe666


    14,500 odd was the worst one. said company ended up going out of business too, and the rat never lifted an all powerful finger to let them off the hook.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,143 ✭✭✭spongebob


    Phew, coulda been double that for a residential user with the 2 month Billing cycle, imagine a €29,000 Bill and VAT on top of that :(€35,000


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 495 ✭✭The Insider


    Did I mention a refund either?

    I suggested a systemic non intrusive approach, remove them all from the normal international outdial set and let the account holder opt in as they see fit, if they want one Band 13 country they get them all.

    When a person rings to complain about there internet charges, they generally get put through to Eircom Net who as you know Muck have no control over the things you are suggesting, your point was that the customer service reps where misinforming the customer, and I ask you again what should the customer service people in Eicom Net say to the people who ring in and say it is the ISP's fault that they have been billed for the porn diallers? What would you suggest Eicom Net say to these people. I have only ever heard of porn diallers coming form Porn sites which is then tough s**t, or warez/crack sites which if you are on then you should now how to use you pc.
    14,500 odd was the worst one. said company ended up going out of business too, and the rat never lifted an all powerful finger to let them off the hook

    That was a misconfigured router not a porn dialer victim.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,143 ✭✭✭spongebob


    Originally posted by The Insider

    When a person rings to complain about there internet charges, they generally get put through to Eircom Net who as you know Muck have no control over the things you are suggesting.

    This is nothing to do with Eircom.Net as I said all along.

    It is an Eircom Retail issue at the Billing end and at the line service provisioning end. Eircom Retail are also responsibe for the delivery of the USO and this is a USO issue under the Control Of Costs section.

    M


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,526 ✭✭✭vengeance52


    Muck,
    i think its better if you didnt mention names. I use to work for eircom until recently, yes i was desperate, and i know who your talking about and i dont think they want to get into hot water by revealing info like that cos its breech of contract so it better to keep things anonymous.

    Vengeance :ninja:


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,143 ✭✭✭spongebob


    I have not named names and will not divulge my 2 sources , one of whom deals with these issues regularly....nuff said there.

    I suggested a resolution which would protect the unwary from some of the worse excesses of the problem by deprovisioning Band 13 through the USO with an opt in system for those who knowingly choose to contact those countries.

    In other words, I said that the scale of this issue is such that the lazy regulator we have must be persuaded to regulate through the USO mechanism under the section that deals with the RIGHT to control costs. The GOOD news for the victims is that Porn dialler victims diverted to Band 13 countries will have an actionable case against Comreg themselves once the USO micro review is complete in about 3 or 4 weeks. The emails I urged you to send are hard evidence that Comreg was made aware of the issue and of how to remedy it in a Universal way . If Comreg refuse to do so then let them explain it to a judge.

    M


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,608 ✭✭✭✭sceptre


    OK, just to interject. I've had a few reports about the whole personal abuse and attacking the poster thing. Broadly speaking, I agree with the complaints. In other words, please keep to disagreeing with the posts if you see fit to do so but under no circumstances attack the poster in a personal manner. As some people may have noticed, there are some posters on some other boards that I'd like to shake firmly and slap around the head but I do try to keep the personal "you are an idiot" type posts off-screen.

    I'm not editing the posts in question (at least for the moment), tempted as I am to do so (though there's still time for anyone to edit their own posts). I do think the point has been missed in a number of posts though. I'd suggest that any new posters to this thread actually read the whole thread. Might be an idea for previous contributors to do likewise but I obviously can't force you.

    Keep it civil please. Doing otherwise just makes you look silly. That's why I'm leaving the posts there untouched. We are available to anyone who wants to PM us to make a comment about /any/ thread on this board. Can't promise to do what you want done but we do listen:)

    That's the mod part out of the way.


  • Advertisement
Advertisement