Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Liverpool Fiction

  • 21-06-2003 2:51am
    #1
    Closed Accounts Posts: 1,672 ✭✭✭


    Iv noticed one or two threads talking about who are Liverpool going to buy and such like. What an utter fiction.

    TBH Liverpool arent going to get anyone big. They only have 15 million to spend and are only in the UEFA cup which isnt able to draw players. If Liverpool can get two small players (ie finnan and one or two more) they will be doing well.

    This fictional talk of Liverpool like they are going to be up to much next season is total fiction. :mad:


«1

Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,438 ✭✭✭TwoShedsJackson


    Is 'fiction' your word of the week or something? Anyway, you're right - no Champion's League football and Liverpool's reknowned 'style' of football means they'll have a hard time attracting anyone.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,148 ✭✭✭Ronan|Raven


    Todays word is "Fiction" Frankly I dont bother taking any heed of any transfer speculation in the papers/tv the lot, newspapers must have a template whereby they insert a club name , players name and a silly price hit "randomise" and away ya go. Hmmm I could get a job for the sun. It's gona be very hard for Liverpool to sign any "big" player as TwoSheds has stated, no CL and a poor style of play which will please god change this season.

    fic·tion ( P ) (fkshn)
    n.

    An imaginative creation or a pretense that does not represent actuality but has been invented.
    The act of inventing such a creation or pretense.
    A lie.

    A literary work whose content is produced by the imagination and is not necessarily based on fact.
    The category of literature comprising works of this kind, including novels and short stories.
    Law. Something untrue that is intentionally represented as true by the narrator.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,835 ✭✭✭StickyMcGinty


    yea at the moment liverpool are only living of their reputation when signing players. we are still one of the top 9 clubs in europe, dont forget that!!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,164 ✭✭✭Space Coyote


    "One of the top 9 clubs in Europe."
    You must have been counting teams in your head to come up with that number ! ;)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,386 ✭✭✭smuckers


    They have a chance of getting Malbranque but Chelsea have emerged as contenders too, I don't think they will get Duffer though.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,672 ✭✭✭Wolf


    First off I can think of at least another 20 clubs that are bigger in europe ( ie Italians, Spainish, Englich and Dutch )

    Also as has been said I think LIverpool have as much chance of getting Duffer as Cork City. There are loads of clubs in the prem and over trhe world tha would love to have Duff and would pay more and have more pulling power than Liverpool.

    This is the entire crux of the matter Liverpool atm can afford or attract any of the really big players.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,538 ✭✭✭PiE


    Great, thanks! This was a really good topic for a new thread.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,503 ✭✭✭Makaveli


    Originally posted by Wolf
    First off I can think of at least another 20 clubs that are bigger in europe ( ie Italians, Spainish, Englich and Dutch )


    Really? I got about 13. Go on name them. I'm bored.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 192 ✭✭Paul007


    Originally posted by Wolf
    First off I can think of at least another 20 clubs that are bigger in europe ( ie Italians, Spainish, Englich and Dutch )

    Name them



    Also as has been said I think LIverpool have as much chance of getting Duffer as Cork City. There are loads of clubs in the prem and over trhe world tha would love to have Duff and would pay more and have more pulling power than Liverpool.

    This is the entire crux of the matter Liverpool atm can afford or attract any of the really big players.

    Nonsense. Liverpool are a founder member of G-14 and only Man Utd can claim to be a bigger club in England.
    They are also one of the best run clubs in England and generate a healthy profit every season.
    There's no doubt missing out on the CL this season was a blow but it won't have the detrimental effect most people are expecting with respect to transfer funds.
    If they fail to qualify next season, then they have a problem.

    According to some, Liverpool have £15-20m to spend this summer, where this magic figure comes from, I'm not sure but it won't be too much of a problem with the new transfer policies that have been introduced. Basically, the transfer fee of new signings can be paid in installments over the length of the players contract.
    When you take into account the lull in the transfer market, having £20m to spend doesn't sound too bad. I don't think you'll find many clubs spending that amount throughout Europe to be honest.

    In relation to Duff.
    First of all, he has stated he has no desire to play abroad mainly because he doesn't like the hotter climates. Therefore, I think it is safe to assume that he will be staying in the Premiership unless he fancies a move to the SPL.

    Of the teams in England, only Man Utd, Newcastle and Liverpool could afford him atm.
    Arsenal - building a new stadium and haven't much money to spend. In any case, they aren't in the market for a left winger.
    Man U - definitely a viable option but they already have Giggs and are rumoured to be after Ronaldinho and Kewell, so it looks unlikely.
    Newcastle - another club that has the means but they already have Robert and Viana.
    That leaves Liverpool. They are in desperate need of a left winger, have the funds and are a huge club.

    Also, I wouldn't be so quick to dismiss their pulling power either. Liverpool have a rich history and remain a much respected club in world football.
    Just because they don't buy big doesn't mean they can't.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,672 ✭✭✭Wolf


    Well maybe 20 was an over estimation but ill give it ago but I reckon I can get at least near it.

    Btw im talking Pulling power and this season.

    Roma, Millan, Inter, Juve, Lazio, Parma, Bayern, Dortmound, Shalka, Leverkusen, Ajax, PSV, Arsnel, Man U, Newcastle, Chealsa, Barca, Real, Valencia, Deportivo. Theres also that other club in holland that names escape me and I havent even mentioned the french league.

    Right now lets all bedate about how im wrong to have said certain clubs. But Im pretty certain all the clubs I have mentioned most players would rather be there than at Liverpool and most of those clubs have more money to spend :/


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,672 ✭✭✭Wolf


    Originally posted by PiE
    Great, thanks! This was a really good topic for a new thread.

    And that was a really usfull post you twat


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,081 ✭✭✭BKtje


    Wolf: Feyenoord/ PSV Eindhoven what you meant?

    Wouldnt consider either of them to be bigger than l'pool tbh.
    Most of the clubs u mentioned were correct imo tho.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,174 ✭✭✭✭kmart6


    Well atleast Cisse said he will join them when his contract runs out after next season with Auxerre.I think this whole thing of them buying Duff for between 15-20 million is f**ked up,dont get me wrong Duff is a good player but he is definatly not worth that amount of money


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 192 ✭✭Paul007


    Originally posted by Wolf
    Well maybe 20 was an over estimation but ill give it ago but I reckon I can get at least near it.

    Btw im talking Pulling power and this season.

    Roma, Millan, Inter, Juve, Lazio, Parma, Bayern, Dortmound, Shalka, Leverkusen, Ajax, PSV, Arsnel, Man U, Newcastle, Chealsa, Barca, Real, Valencia, Deportivo. Theres also that other club in holland that names escape me and I havent even mentioned the french league.

    Right now lets all bedate about how im wrong to have said certain clubs. But Im pretty certain all the clubs I have mentioned most players would rather be there than at Liverpool and most of those clubs have more money to spend :/

    Quite a list.

    Let's see, it's widely acknowledged that La Liga, Seria A and the Premiership are the strongest leagues in Europe at the moment, thus have the greatest pulling power.

    Looking at your list, only Bayern and possibly Ajax would have a greater pull than Liverpool. In Ajax's case, this is simply due to CL qualification as the Dutch league isn't that strong.

    It seems you're of the opinion that qualification for the CL this year is the deciding factor. I'm sure it plays a part in a players thinking alright but surely they gage the club over the period of the contract they sign with them and the prestige of the club - failure to do so would be very short sighted imo.
    Personally, I don't think they'd be too worried about Liverpool's future.
    Afterall, they have qualified for two out of the last three CL's and missed out this year on the last day of the season - this despite having the worst run of results in over fifty years!

    I've already touched on the financial situation in my last post, so I won't repeat myself. However, I stand by what I said earlier. Most clubs, including those on your list, will not have much money to spend this summer.

    Right, getting back to your list.
    I think it's quite amusing that you have included Leverkusen and Lazio. Leverkusen sold most of their best players last year and narrowly avoided relegation on the last day of the German season. Can't see them being much of a draw.
    Lazio are struggling financially. The club is up for sale at the moment and is in so much debt that some players have complained of not getting their wages. I'd imagine any player would be wary of signing for them at the moment even if they did qualify for the CL.


    That being said, here's my reckoning.


    Definite
    Real, Milan, Juve, Inter, Roma, Barca, Man U, Arsenal.


    Debatable
    Valencia, Parma, Bayern, Dortmund, Ajax, PSV, Lazio, Chelsea, Newcastle, Deportivo.

    No Chance
    Schalke, Leverkusen.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 106 ✭✭jEt|Dino


    you got owned WOLF


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,835 ✭✭✭StickyMcGinty


    exactly, liverpool are founders of the G-14

    thats how i got 9 btw i didnt pull it out of the air. count up them 14 teams and most are there just to represent their countries.

    i also love they way you stuck in Barca, who have been struggling to get in to europe for the past 3 years. and if they dont win tonight they wont get in to the UEFACKUP


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,672 ✭✭✭Wolf


    Alot of this comes down to opinion thats true but Barca will always have loads of money and pulling power just because they are Barca.

    You also said that Bayern, Valencia, arent a big european clubs??? Oh come on please. The majority of the clubs you mentioned in Debatable arent that debatable.

    You have mentioned pestige and then have gone on to knock Lazio.
    Which is a contradiction in itself.

    As for Newcastle they have qualified regularly for CL and have a gut load of money to spend (at least double Liverpool). This can also be appiled to a number of those clubs.

    Im not saying that Liverpools future is terriable but next season the best they can really hope for would be a top 4 finish and the realistic hope would be a top 7 or 8 finish. I think Liverpool will not be a challenger for at least another 3 years.

    The point of this thread was not to say that Liverpool are at the beggining of the end. More my point was that some of the people on this forum seem to keep on talking about who Liverpool are going to sign when its is quite clear they have little or no chance of signing anybody with a big a name of a big price.

    The whole duffer thing is pittiful tbh.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,672 ✭✭✭Wolf


    Originally posted by jEt|Dino
    you got owned WOLF

    Well Dino with a post like that you really got your point across thanks I must have got so badly owned you truly are the l33test.















    Idiot Child :p


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2 situation_room


    Does anyone seriously think that irrespective of who they can afford to buy, that Liverpool are serious contenders for anything this season??? The first thing the club needs to do is get rid of GH, he is a complete TWAT!

    Every pre-season it's the same story...Liverpool will be serious contenders this year....and what happens....NOTHING...NADA....ZIP!!! Why? Simply because Liverpool play as well as Michael Owen plays. They stand and fall on his form.

    Look at United, they can win, even grind out results irrespective of who plays or doesn't. Liverpool have to adopt the same policy. They are so far behind the real contenders. Give it a rest lads and lassies and support a team that might do well...Portsmouth even!!!


  • Moderators, Regional North East Moderators Posts: 12,739 Mod ✭✭✭✭cournioni


    Main factor in big name signings in Europe:

    THE CHAMPIONS LEAGUE

    If you are not in it, tough luck you'll just have to get into it next season to attract players. End of story.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,672 ✭✭✭Wolf


    My point thanks


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,835 ✭✭✭StickyMcGinty


    Originally posted by situation_room
    [B
    Look at United, they can win, even grind out results irrespective of who plays or doesn't. Liverpool have to adopt the same policy. They are so far behind the real contenders. Give it a rest lads and lassies and support a team that might do well...Portsmouth even!!! [/B]


    that'll be the day....

    i'd rather adopt arsenals approach of not relying on last minute goals to win games


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,503 ✭✭✭Makaveli


    Originally posted by Wolf
    Roma, Millan, Inter, Juve, Lazio, Parma, Bayern, Dortmound, Shalka, Leverkusen, Ajax, PSV, Arsnel, Man U, Newcastle, Chealsa, Barca, Real, Valencia, Deportivo. Theres also that other club in holland that names escape me and I havent even mentioned the french league.



    Leverkusen? Eh no I don't think so.
    From that list Inter, Milan, Juve, Barce, Bayern, Ajax, Arsenal, Man Utd, Real, Deportivo and Valencia.

    Chelsea and Newcastle are around about the same as Liverpool maybe, but I think Liverpool have bigger pulling power than them.
    Parma, Roma, PSV, Lazio, Dortmund and Schalke, imo Liverpool have greater pulling power.

    Wolf, out of interest, who do you support?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,672 ✭✭✭Wolf


    Originally posted by Makaveli
    Leverkusen? Eh no I don't think so.
    From that list Inter, Milan, Juve, Barce, Bayern, Ajax, Arsenal, Man Utd, Real, Deportivo and Valencia.

    Okay thats sorted
    Chelsea and Newcastle are around about the same as Liverpool maybe, but I think Liverpool have bigger pulling power than them.

    Yeah yeah right. More money and CL and both teams with alot more potebtial and better prospects in the imediate future.
    Parma, Roma, PSV, Lazio, Dortmund and Schalke, imo Liverpool have greater pulling power.

    Also Roma, Lazio are deffinatly bigger and have more pulling power and possibly this seaon Dortmound.
    Wolf, out of interest, who do you support?

    Bristol Rovers..... Honest ;)















    Newcastle


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,503 ✭✭✭Makaveli


    Chelsea dont have more money than Liverpool.
    Liverpool have a better reputation than Newcastle and Chelsea. More pulling power so. And before you jump down my throat, yes Newcastle and Chelsea were better last season, but history wise I'm talking about. And you also say immediate future, yeah as in one season because I bet you anything Liverpool will be in the CL next season at the expense of one of them because Arsenal and Man Utd will still be there too. Afterall it went down to the last game of the season to decide wether it would be Liverpool or Chelsea in the CL, seems people forgot that very quickly.

    Roma are a glorified UEFA cup team imo, yeah they've done well domestically over the last few seasons, but they're not CL contenders. Not saying Liverpool are, but I still rate Liverpool ahead of them. I don't rate Lazio very highly either.

    Oh and off topic, Valenica are only in the UEFA cup too and Barcelona beat Celta 2-0 tonight and Real beat Bilbao so Barce are in the UEFA cup.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,581 ✭✭✭uberwolf


    liverpool reported the second largest profit in the prem this season, greater than arsenal. they have reasonable funds- greater than arsenals, and prob chelsea(the old folks home of euro football) Houllier has great contacts in france and can attract their top players. that said no world star will come for footballing reasons alone this season, but broken promises are not forgotten and even owen has suggested he'll leave for medals if needs be.

    to summise players already in prem would move to liverpool, french and germans too, no italians jump out as being worth buying, even if lfc could get them. but time is running out for what i consider a sleeping giant if they intend cliombing the summits soon, or else a new manager will be needed. we'll see. i used to be optomistic bout pools chances annually- no longer


  • Moderators, Regional North East Moderators Posts: 12,739 Mod ✭✭✭✭cournioni


    Originally posted by Makaveli
    Chelsea dont have more money than Liverpool.
    Liverpool have a better reputation than Newcastle and Chelsea. More pulling power so. And before you jump down my throat, yes Newcastle and Chelsea were better last season, but history wise I'm talking about.
    Nottingham Forest have a better history than Newcastle and Chelsea. So you should scrap that idea Mak.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 815 ✭✭✭Bannor


    Originally posted by Wolf
    Alot of this comes down to opinion thats true but Barca will always have loads of money and pulling power just because they are Barca.
    Barca have a debt of about €70M, they don't have money to spend at the moment which is why Laporta's(??) €30M for David Beckham was laughable.
    You also said that Bayern, Valencia, arent a big european clubs??? Oh come on please. The majority of the clubs you mentioned in Debatable arent that debatable.

    You have mentioned pestige and then have gone on to knock Lazio.
    Which is a contradiction in itself.
    Not really - SS Lazio was created so that the fascists in Rome would have a team to support. They blew a shed load of money building a team to win the Italian title a few years ago and have done nothing since - that is the highlight of their history. They don't have any money to spend so they can't grab headlines from Roma with their transfers.

    As for the debatable teams :-

    Newcastle are not a top European team, when did they last win something?

    Chelsea - another club that blew a load of money on players to win a few cups, their pulling power in the international transfer market has been based on paying high wages and being based in London. What has it achieved? A Cup Winners Cup when every other major club was in the UEFA Cup or Champions League and almost bankrupted the club in the process.

    In terms of transfer pulling power the Dutch clubs are sellers and not buyers Ajax and PSV have a history of developing talent.

    In Spain, Real and Barca get 60% of the tv money between them which doesn't leave the others with alot. Teams temporarily get to the top but never sustain a consistent challenge to the two because they don't have the resources to compete.

    The German clubs don't spend big money in the transfer market and the fact that you included Leverkusen in the list at all is laughable - they're reknowned for having one of the best scouting networks which they use to discover talent. The highlight of their history is winning a UEFA Cup and getting to a Champion's League Final - They have never won the domestic league. Following their season of 'almost success' their two best players went to Bayern. This year they narrowly avoided relegation and are looking to offload their best players again. Bayern are by far the biggest club in Germany but they're a big fish in a small pond.
    As for Newcastle they have qualified regularly for CL and have a gut load of money to spend (at least double Liverpool). This can also be appiled to a number of those clubs.
    I don't know where you got the information about Newcastle's money pot but it's entirely dependent on the Champions League. Liverpool don't have the extra cash from the Champions League available to spend this season but there is the matter of the money that wasn't spent last season : £12M which was refused for Duff and £9M which thankfully wasn't spent on Bowyer. There's also the cash cow trip to the Far East where they'll rake in money on merchandise - Newcastle don't have a history to live off of.
    Im not saying that Liverpools future is terriable but next season the best they can really hope for would be a top 4 finish and the realistic hope would be a top 7 or 8 finish. I think Liverpool will not be a challenger for at least another 3 years.
    I think you're being too pessimistic because the expectations for last season were so high. The acquisition of Finnan alone will bring more balance to the team and give us a chance of finishing higher up the table.
    The point of this thread was not to say that Liverpool are at the beggining of the end. More my point was that some of the people on this forum seem to keep on talking about who Liverpool are going to sign when its is quite clear they have little or no chance of signing anybody with a big a name of a big price.

    The whole duffer thing is pittiful tbh.
    At the end of the season Houllier came out with a bold statement about the players he wanted to bring in this summer: Duff, Boumsong and Cisse. Of these Souness has priced Duff out of the market - something that Duff has publicly said that he's not happy about. There was also mention of him saying that if he had known it was going to happen then he wouldn't have signed the new contract at the start of last season. Auxerre had agreed to let Boumsong and Cisse go because they weren't expected to qualify for Europe, then they went and won the French Cup which has thrown a spanner in the works. Both players have declared their intentions to leave but the club wants to keep them but now they risk losing them at knock down fees or on Bosmans next year. There will be a big shake up at Auxerre this summer - they have already lost one appeal over Mexes' contract, he also wants to leave the club. The transfer window is open until the end of August so the saga has a long time to run yet.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,392 ✭✭✭jonno


    Well done Bannor - spot on.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 211 ✭✭marct


    Spot on Bannor! At last an argument with some evidence and knowledge of football behind it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,622 ✭✭✭talla


    a few good points there, except duff never said anything of the kind about not being happy about the price tag or signing a new contract with blackburn last year, he came out and said he never said any such thoing to any newspaper.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,672 ✭✭✭Wolf


    Ah ffs now i have to start with proper posts that take me more than five seconds to write sigh :(
    Originally posted by Bannor
    Barca have a debt of about €70M, they don't have money to spend at the moment which is why Laporta's(??) €30M for David Beckham was laughable.


    This is not entirly true.
    While yes they are in rather large dept Laporta will/has (more or less) taken over. What will happen, as has happened with Real as well, is that they can destroy themsleves financially and then Fans of the team and indeed the council will throw money at the team and buy them out of dept. Also haveing a 100,000 seater stadium helps.
    Not really - SS Lazio was created so that the fascists in Rome would have a team to support. They blew a shed load of money building a team to win the Italian title a few years ago and have done nothing since - that is the highlight of their history. They don't have any money to spend so they can't grab headlines from Roma with their transfers.


    Yes but Lazio have a large stadium and plenty od backing and will always be able to attract the big names. They have also been around for a long time and do have a histroy (even if not a nice one) and will allways be able to get plays (if not blacks). Also the fact that Roma and Lazio have big backer and a hugh stadium and loyal fans.
    As for the debatable teams :-

    Newcastle are not a top European team, when did they last win something?


    This is not the point, perhaps we are talking about a very different ideas here. The point is that the majority of players out there this summer would rather go to Chealsa or Newcastle than go to Liverpool. I dont think im wrong in saying this.....
    Chelsea - another club that blew a load of money on players to win a few cups, their pulling power in the international transfer market has been based on paying high wages and being based in London. What has it achieved? A Cup Winners Cup when every other major club was in the UEFA Cup or Champions League and almost bankrupted the club in the process.


    Ah but since Ranieri has come in he has come in he has stablized the team and the club while not been able to run out and sign big money still has a very good squad and excellent youth squad and really could be contenders next year if a bit of a surprize package.
    In terms of transfer pulling power the Dutch clubs are sellers and not buyers Ajax and PSV have a history of developing talent.


    However, lets not forget that some of those young talented teams have gone far and won things in the CL and as a result cant be written off.
    In Spain, Real and Barca get 60% of the tv money between them which doesn't leave the others with alot. Teams temporarily get to the top but never sustain a consistent challenge to the two because they don't have the resources to compete.


    Eh? Valencia and Deportivo have been in good CL form the last couple of years and have been alot for consisten in the CL than Liverpool over the last 5/6 years in the CL. Also lets not forget that Real were taken to the very last day of the season this year and Barca well lets not go there (which you have already said and then said this:confused:)
    The German clubs don't spend big money in the transfer market and the fact that you included Leverkusen in the list at all is laughable - they're reknowned for having one of the best scouting networks which they use to discover talent. The highlight of their history is winning a UEFA Cup and getting to a Champion's League Final - They have never won the domestic league. Following their season of 'almost success' their two best players went to Bayern. This year they narrowly avoided relegation and are looking to offload their best players again. Bayern are by far the biggest club in Germany but they're a big fish in a small pond.


    I can see your point about Leverkusen, fair enough but to put German clubs down as not big spenders is rubbish. Dortmound bought Amoruso at some large price (and Dortmund have an undenighable eruo pedigre) and as for Bayern anyone who even tries to say they arent a big Eruo contender is talking thro their ass.
    I don't know where you got the information about Newcastle's money pot but it's entirely dependent on the Champions League. Liverpool don't have the extra cash from the Champions League available to spend this season but there is the matter of the money that wasn't spent last season : £12M which was refused for Duff and £9M which thankfully wasn't spent on Bowyer. There's also the cash cow trip to the Far East where they'll rake in money on merchandise - Newcastle don't have a history to live off of.


    Ah funny that you have mentioned that infact the whole reason for the Newcastle success story is the fact the the onwers have thrown money into it left right and centre but apart from that Newcastle have the 2nd highest average attendance (after Man U) and one of the largest shirt sales in England, yearly. They have also been extremly smart in the market since Bobby came in and have quailifed again for the CL as well as making the second round last years with a relativly low wage buget.

    Now you tell me that Newcastle dont have alot more money than Liverpool to spend.

    On top of the you should take a look at how much the Liverpool sqauds wage bill is (party due to size) and the lack of CL football win in the past few years has hit them.
    I think you're being too pessimistic because the expectations for last season were so high. The acquisition of Finnan alone will bring more balance to the team and give us a chance of finishing higher up the table.


    Ill agree that Finnan was more than likly an excellent signing but the need to off load some of the flops that are unfortuantly on big wages. They will also have to unload these for a cut price and replace them with players that the buget can ill afford. This means that any real challange will take at least 2/3 years to come to furition.
    At the end of the season Houllier came out with a bold statement about the players he wanted to bring in this summer: Duff, Boumsong and Cisse. Of these Souness has priced Duff out of the market - something that Duff has publicly said that he's not happy about. There was also mention of him saying that if he had known it was going to happen then he wouldn't have signed the new contract at the start of last season. Auxerre had agreed to let Boumsong and Cisse go because they weren't expected to qualify for Europe, then they went and won the French Cup which has thrown a spanner in the works. Both players have declared their intentions to leave but the club wants to keep them but now they risk losing them at knock down fees or on Bosmans next year. There will be a big shake up at Auxerre this summer - they have already lost one appeal over Mexes' contract, he also wants to leave the club. The transfer window is open until the end of August so the saga has a long time to run yet.

    At the end of the day, yes, Houllier did come out with some rather unrealistic signing promises and at the end of the day if they had managed to get CL then this wouldnt be the case. But that fact is that they havent managed CL and will have to look else where for players of quality (which is undoutedly needed for the team to progress). While Houllier is well respected in France and does have contactes he will have to set the bar a little lower. These two new young french players hes signed (im sorry but the name escape me right now) I know are talented players and could be just what the docter ordered. However, when you say about the pulling power of the manager you need look know futher than Bobby Robsen who probably ahs the greatest pulling power for players world wide.

    To sum up....... (dam you for making me write a real post)

    You made some excellents point and I thank you but the entire point of this post was to put a bit of realizim into the rantings :p that many of the threads seem to have about Liverpool and who they will sign. The simple fact of the matter is after a very lack luster couple of seaons Liverpool have a hill to climb and while im sure they will climb that hill they are still going to have to do it.

    Cheers
    Wolf

    PS sorry for any bad spelling/Grammer but im in work and havent a chance to read over this more than once. :(


  • Moderators, Regional North East Moderators Posts: 12,739 Mod ✭✭✭✭cournioni


    It has alot to do with the manager too. Proven managers will always attract players. Successful managers will always attract world class talent as long as the league is good. I don't think Houllier has done his reputation any favours this season with the performances Liverpool have put on.

    Bobby Robson and Claudio Ranieri are proven managers. The Leverkusen manager is a proven manager. I could go on and on.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,538 ✭✭✭PiE


    One bad season (with still one cup to show for it btw) and Houllier is suddenly an "unproven" manager? I don't like his tactics either and I know they've been shown up for the unimaginative crud that they are, but you cannot deny he's been successful and he has the potential to take the team one step further. Whether he still has it in him to take that step (after the surgery, which undoubtedly changed him), nobody will know until a few weeks into next season.

    Anyway, Newcastle probably have as much as Liverpool in the kitty at the moment, but Liverpool have that money without CL funds. If a "big" player were to choose Newcastle over Liverpool at this stage he would be either be extremely short sighted or have a huge amount of respect for Bobby Robson (which isn't entirely unlikely). If a player had a straight decision to make: Liverpool or Newcastle (no other options, including staying put) I still think he would choose Liverpool. I'm not saying this because I am a Liverpool fan, I'm saying this because Liverpool have more international respect than Newcastle/Chelsea. Be this due to history, prestige, the manager or whatever you like, it doesn't change the fact that overall Liverpool have a better pedigree and as such, they have more "pulling power".


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,672 ✭✭✭Wolf


    The above statement just isnt true. Newvastle have

    1/ A bigger stadium, more revenue from CL, more shirt sales, a maller squad on less wages and more money for CL again this year.

    2/ As for prestige player want to play in the CL and they arent blind to liverpool the last couple of seaons so why in the world would they rather go there?

    You have said that a player would rather Liverpool right now than Newcastle thats just crazy. He would get to play in the CL with a very promising group of young players that play exciting football with one of the best managers of all time.

    At Liverpool they get to play in the UEFA cup with a team that has played boring tactics and a manager and team that have under achived over the past few years.:confused:

    Im sorry buy you are only saying that cuz your a pool fan and the facts dont back it up.

    I commend you for defending your club but it just doesnt add up. Also I have stated many of this in my post plaese read the posts before replying PIE


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,538 ✭✭✭PiE


    Originally posted by Wolf
    The above statement just isnt true. Newvastle have

    1/ A bigger stadium, more revenue from CL, more shirt sales, a maller squad on less wages and more money for CL again this year.

    You keep saying that Newcastle have more shirt sales, but fail to provide proof. I'd hazard a guess that they have the bigger increase in shirt sales this season, rather than the biggest shirt sales overall. Considering Liverpool also have a much larger global following, I would doubt that they're having much trouble shifting jerseys. Liverpool also have money from their last two CL (and a UEFA cup, lest we forget) efforts and their wages aren't high either, with only 2 or 3 players on "huge" wages by today's standards.

    2/ As for prestige player want to play in the CL and they arent blind to liverpool the last couple of seaons so why in the world would they rather go there?
    Again, you're looking at the immediate future, which is fine. But most people would agree that Liverpool, with some tactical adjustments will easily qualify for the CL in the next few seasons.
    You have said that a player would rather Liverpool right now than Newcastle thats just crazy. He would get to play in the CL with a very promising group of young players that play exciting football with one of the best managers of all time.
    I don't agree with that. Newcastle have some very good players, but much like Liverpool they rely on 1 or 2 players to win their games. The fact that Newcastle can play so well is as much down to Bobby's motivation as it is to individual talent.
    At Liverpool they get to play in the UEFA cup with a team that has played boring tactics and a manager and team that have under achived over the past few years.:confused:
    You're right. Six cups in 4 seasons is underachieving when you have the pedigree of a team like Liverpool. I could rest my case there, with you having proved my point.
    Im sorry buy you are only saying that cuz your a pool fan and the facts dont back it up.

    I commend you for defending your club but it just doesnt add up. Also I have stated many of this in my post plaese read the posts before replying PIE

    You haven't stated anything apart from your personal opinion (which, unless you've got a bank statement from all the clubs mentioned, is all that anyone can give in this case), but since you're being condescending to me...

    I also commend your attempts to convince... um... yourself that Newcastle are a European super-power, but qualifying for a couple of CL's does not a super-power make when the likelihood is they are just another flash-in-the-pan, albeit a pretty good one.

    I really didn't wanna get involved with this, as "pulling power" isn't something we can use a ruler to gauge.


  • Moderators, Regional North East Moderators Posts: 12,739 Mod ✭✭✭✭cournioni


    Originally posted by PiE
    One bad season (with still one cup to show for it btw) and Houllier is suddenly an "unproven" manager? I don't like his tactics either and I know they've been shown up for the unimaginative crud that they are, but you cannot deny he's been successful and he has the potential to take the team one step further. Whether he still has it in him to take that step (after the surgery, which undoubtedly changed him), nobody will know until a few weeks into next season.
    What has he won in the past few seasons apart from a few Mickey Mouse trophies? One FA Cup, one UEFA Cup (who cares?), a few Worthless cups on top of that. And a whoopdedoo CL place last year. Yes, not many people do like his tactics, so do you think World Class players will play in a team that plays with tactics like Houlliers? No, no they won't.

    Who is the least proven manager out of these three... Bobby Robson, Claudio Ranieri and Gerard Houllier.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,538 ✭✭✭PiE


    Originally posted by PORNAPSTER
    Who is the least proven manager out of these three... Bobby Robson, Claudio Ranieri and Gerard Houllier.

    Who out of those 3 has won the most cups at their current club?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,672 ✭✭✭Wolf


    It a well known fact that Newcastle have shifted one of the largest amounts of shirts in the UK. Im actaully a share holder and if I can find the last report I got ill post up the figures here.

    Also you have said about Liverpools last two European adventures. The distance you go in the CL is very important to the money you get as is the results as you get more money if you win games in the CL.

    Im not trying to say the Newcastle are a eruopean super power and never even tried to claim that. All I was saying was that Newcastle have....

    1/ More money

    2/More pulling power this season.

    Also im sorry the I came across condescending I honestly did mean to but probably did :(.

    Also...
    Who out of those 3 has won the most cups at their current club?


    Common please. How about the question who ahs done more for the clubs in the time they have been there or more to the point who has won the most cups overall.

    As for the worthless cup dont even fob that off as an achivement.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,622 ✭✭✭talla


    You're right. Six cups in 4 seasons is underachieving when you have the pedigree of a team like Liverpool. I could rest my case there, with you having proved my point.

    would you ever kop on and stop counting the charity shield and european super cup as competitions, next you'll be including tiddlywinks as a houlier achievment, part of the "5 trophies in one year brigade". give it a rest
    :o


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,604 ✭✭✭LizardKing


    When your team are not doing as consistently well as other teams especially fierce rivals like scumchester then you'll take all you can get and as a fan of a club who are going through a rough patch , we stick by the club and support them when they are struggling... Liverpool is a loyal club with extrememely loyal fans, fans who've been through a lot.

    Currently Liverpool are not playing top class football and may not be able to attract "Big Name" stars as they could in the past however football goes through cycles and currently liverpool are in a mini slump ; I have every confidence in the club and the players and I think they'll turn it around and remain one of the top European clubs.

    All the negative comments about liverpool just help to spur the team on , so keep up the belittling and the slagging , but soon I've no doubts .... you'll be eating your words....

    L I V E R P O O L


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 121 ✭✭Humphrey


    :)
    When will Liverpool fans like LizardKing realise that Liverpool WAS a big club perhaps one of THE BIGGEST clubs however this is all in the past.

    Nottingham Forest where once a very big club aswell.


    Manu Supporter.
    Humphrey.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,604 ✭✭✭LizardKing


    Thanks for that Humphrey , although you could have just shouted over and said that :)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 815 ✭✭✭Bannor


    Originally posted by PORNAPSTER
    Bobby Robson and Claudio Ranieri are proven managers. The Leverkusen manager is a proven manager. I could go on and on.
    I presume you mean the former Leverkusen manager Klaus Toppmoller and not Peter Lehnhoff who was appointed after Toppmoller was sacked in February.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 815 ✭✭✭Bannor


    Originally posted by Wolf
    Ah ffs now i have to start with proper posts that take me more than five seconds to write sigh :(
    I know what you mean :) I'll break up my responses from now on hopefully it'll make things easier.
    This is not entirly true.
    While yes they are in rather large dept Laporta will/has (more or less) taken over. What will happen, as has happened with Real as well, is that they can destroy themsleves financially and then Fans of the team and indeed the council will throw money at the team and buy them out of dept. Also haveing a 100,000 seater stadium helps.
    There's a guy on one of the Liverpool fan site's messageboards who is well connected with Barcelona and Real Madrid. His take on the Barcelona saga is that the club is in trouble, both financially and on the pitch.

    Gus Hiddink refused the management job because the money being offered was 'an insult'. Frank Rijkaard also refused the job because of the money on offer but Cruyff apparently talked him into taking the job on Saturday evening.

    There's a major split in the dressing room because certain members of the Dutch contingent don't get on with their team mates - the club have been trying to offload Kluivert and Overmars since last Christmas but there are no takers. The fans aren't happy with the big money foreign stars not making the effort on the pitch and started to boycott home games. The players were notified at the weekend that if they want to stay at the Nou Camp that they'll have to take a major pay cut, so they're expecting many departures in the closed season.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 815 ✭✭✭Bannor


    Originally posted by Wolf
    Yes but Lazio have a large stadium and plenty od backing and will always be able to attract the big names. They have also been around for a long time and do have a histroy (even if not a nice one) and will allways be able to get plays (if not blacks). Also the fact that Roma and Lazio have big backer and a hugh stadium and loyal fans.
    Lazio are in severe financial difficulties - they were unable to pay their stars for the last four months of the season and were offering shares in the club instead - the players refused the offer. The club wants to make mandatory 45-50% pay cuts for the players before the start of the season and those who refuse will be sold. It's not a bright future for Lazio - if the don't get their finances sorted before the start of the season they could get kicked out of Serie A.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,538 ✭✭✭PiE


    Originally posted by talla

    would you ever kop on and stop counting the charity shield and european super cup as competitions, next you'll be including tiddlywinks as a houlier achievment, part of the "5 trophies in one year brigade". give it a rest
    :o

    That's just pathetic.

    Those trophies are more than Newcastle/Chelsea have managed and those are the teams Liverpool are being compared with in this thread.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,622 ✭✭✭talla


    That's just pathetic.

    Those trophies are more than Newcastle/Chelsea have managed and those are the teams Liverpool are being compared with in this thread.



    im not discussing those teams, but this idea that liverpool won 6 great trophies is kak. so if you win the amsterdam tournament will that be added to your trophy collection and the great pool have suddenlty won 2 major trophies in 2003, if your going to try and insult someone, back up your arguments with something more intelligent. i have not mentioned newcastle or chelsea anywhere in this thread(others have). i would actuaally rate Liverpool well above Chelsea(they are so close to going into serious financial meltdown) and put them on a par with Newcastle.

    arsenal won the double last year, they al;so beat Liverpool in the charity shield or whatever its called these days. you don't see them walking around claiming they won the trebble last year.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 815 ✭✭✭Bannor


    I cut and pasted the bits related to Newcastle and Chelsea to deal with them together.
    Originally posted by Wolf
    This is not the point, perhaps we are talking about a very different ideas here. The point is that the majority of players out there this summer would rather go to Chealsa or Newcastle than go to Liverpool. I dont think im wrong in saying this.....

    Ah but since Ranieri has come in he has come in he has stablized the team and the club while not been able to run out and sign big money still has a very good squad and excellent youth squad and really could be contenders next year if a bit of a surprize package.

    Ah funny that you have mentioned that infact the whole reason for the Newcastle success story is the fact the the onwers have thrown money into it left right and centre but apart from that Newcastle have the 2nd highest average attendance (after Man U) and one of the largest shirt sales in England, yearly. They have also been extremly smart in the market since Bobby came in and have quailifed again for the CL as well as making the second round last years with a relativly low wage buget.

    Now you tell me that Newcastle dont have alot more money than Liverpool to spend.

    On top of the you should take a look at how much the Liverpool sqauds wage bill is (party due to size) and the lack of CL football win in the past few years has hit them.
    Yes Newcastle have thrown pots of money into the team in the past ten years but what has it achieved on the pitch? Two FA Cup finals. I don't see them as a top European club because they haven't won anything in living memory.

    One of the reasons they don't have a high wage bill is because they don't have a squad full of international quality players - when their key players suffer injuries the team suffers. Robson has done well in the transfer market but he still needs to sort out the defence - an area where he has said they don't need players. They're very good going forward but the are weak defensively, of the defenders in the squad Woodgate is the only one I would rate.

    Chelsea have done well with Ranieri at the helm once he settled on a consistant starting line-up. For years the club has underachieved when you consider they have had international players playing in every position. The problem for the club is one of finances - the Champions League money is used to pay the bills so there won't be major excursions into the transfer market. The centre of their defense could prove to be their undoing next season or two - Desailly is gone and Gallas has once again refused to sign a new contract. If they don't sell him soon they're not going to get major money for him or he could leave on a Bosman.

    Liverpool haven't made the Champion's League this season but it's not too big a problem at the moment. If the team fails to qualify next season or the following season then it may become one. Since Parry joined the club, the Liverpool brand has begun to be exploited with media deals, and the Far East trips are another part of it. Newcastle may have a larger stadium but large stadiums are not the future of the game - tv and merchandising are the big money makers. Man Utd and Liverpool are established in the global market because historically they are the two most successful clubs. They have had a foothold in markets that have not been open to other English clubs - namely the Far East. In the last few seasons others have become wise to this. Arsenal signed a Japanese player to get into the merchandising market in Japan. Similarly Everton signed a Chinese international last year to get a foot hold in China - David Moyes didn't even know the club had signed the player.

    Liverpool's problem on the pitch last season was there was no longer strength in depth. With Redknapp and McAllister gone there was no creative spark in midfield - Berger could have provided it but he was out for most of the season through a knee injury. Cheyrou needs time to adapt to the pace of the game in England. Henchoz's persistent injury problems introduced an element of instability in the defence because we had inadequate cover.

    The wage bill didn't stop Houllier from trying to sign Duff and Bowyer last summer and it certainly won't be an issue this year: Arphexad, Heggem, Xavier, Diomede and Berger will be off the pay roll in July. Babbel should follow soon if he can find himself a club.

    We're still looking for a creative player but the club won't be held to ransom by the likes of Blackburn. Souness has come out with ridiculous figures like £20M for Duff, yet is only willing to offer Millwall £2M for Steven Reid. Man Utd only received £25M for Beckham and Beckham is a goldmine in terms or merchandising.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,604 ✭✭✭LizardKing


    I dunno where ya got the 6 great trophies from , liverpool won 5 trophies in a 5 month period (not bad...) these included both domestic cups and the Uefa Cup as well as two 1 off games the charity shield and european super cup.

    The Uefa Cup has diminished in stature since the 70's , 80's and 90's however it is still a difficult cup competition with some top clubs involved this coming year (Barca, Valencia etc. ) ...

    Last season the three domestic pieces of silverware were shared between Liverpool, Arsenal and ManU ...

    Again the Worthington cup ( or worthless cup as it was called after the game by embarressed ManU fans) is a supposed lesser cup than the Fa Cup. However Liverpool still had to beat a 1st choice ManU side and beating ManU in Cardiff made it all the more worthwhile.

    Liverpool have had trouble being consistent in the domestic League and when they played in Champions League, however stating they are a dying club the likes of Nottingham Forest is imbecilic ...

    6 pieces of silverware for the Trophy Cabinet in Anfield ( you might think its not great .. but I think its not BAD .... ) ww)


  • Advertisement
Advertisement