Did you get market rate?
You won’t get market rate for those as the government manage everything and you just get a cash every month. I would be interest to see what you got though. I would expect 80pc of market rate maybe
Ah yeah, I get that. Was actually wondering how close to market rate the poster got.
One of the big drawbacks as well is that damages only covered up to the value of the deposit.
I'm getting 80% of market rate but I argued for an altogether unrealistically high reference rate and got it. They are so keen for properties, they must have been willing to accept my high figure.
Risk of bad tenant and no power to evict means I'll never do conventional let again, did it for number of years on property in good area, this is a low value house in disadvantaged area.
The number 1 issue negatively impacting investment in long term residential letting, is the risk of a bad tenant not paying and/or wrecking the property, with no consequence on the tenant. Tax, interest rates on buy2let mortgages, unfairness of RPZ, negative press commentary...... are all way behind.
Unless this is fixed, you will never improve the rental market and provide good tenants with better quality at better prices, because it is killing supply and competition. I find it incredible that the biggest problem in the rental market, is never mentioned by Threshold or other similar organisations. This could be fixed with pretty much no cost to the state, but never gets a whisper.
The media is gratuitously biased against landlords so the phenomenon of rogue tenants is grossly underreported.
The high tax rates are not a huge deal for me, taxes are high here no matter what kind of assets you're working with.
I've 84k staked with my sole current residential property right now, no way would I want a property with real value with the sword of damoclese hanging over it in this environment.
Threshold are left wing activists who would have an anti landlord mission statement if four bed houses in rathmines were 400 euro per month
You are still in the same boat when it comes to over holding and tenant damage. AFAIK.
Section 8 from The Landlords HAP booklet
If the tenant stops paying, you will not be informed that they stopped paying.
You will not be informed that you will no longer get rent from the council.
And it will be up to you to evict them.
Councils would have no problem in getting houses for tenants at 80% market (+ inflation index) for 10 year leases if they guaranteed rents and undertook, at the end of the 10 years, to return the property in the condition that it was given to them.
Local authority are my tenant.
Your confusing the HAP scheme with the long term lease scheme.
My rent is guaranteed even the place is empty during periods. I've never met who lives in my house, I don't even know their name.
And that would be very awful value for the taxpayer/exchequer. The government can borrow cash for ten years at sub 1% - you're advocating they guarantee a rental yield of 5% and have no asset at the end of the ten years.
My rental yield is 12% gross, 10% after I pay insurance, property tax and a deduction of one month's rent for repairs (assuming it's no higher on average each year than a months rent)