I confess, I never understand liability laws like that, he robbed the shop yet he can claim against the guy he robbed? Boggles my mind.
If the shop owner has set up traps or done something negligible then yes, he can be sure regardless of how the incident occured.
A big one from years ago was some of the older generation set glass on the top of their walls when building them, came back to bite many of them in the arse.
The solicitor should be ashamed of themselves.
Claim almost certain to fail, as the Occupiers Liability Act imposes a duty of care in respect of visitors only, and the definitions section refers to those on property as of a right...
I would be demanding an inspection of said testicle and would ask Doc Martin to help with the inspection.
He has a right pair of stones on him.
He certainly made a balls up of that robbery.
In all fairness though, yer man has some cheek. I hope he gets nothing
Pity they weren’t torn clean off him. Deserves nothing less.
Was he not wearing trousers?
Surely he would also be claiming for ripped trousers.