#16

This month’s cover features a 26-year-old mother breastfeeding her three-year-old son. The mother, Jamie Lynne Grumet


"It's the wrong tit, Grumet.... and they've gone wrong"

1 person has thanked this post
Pushtrak Registered User
#17

Weylin said:
wait until the guy is 16-18 ,he is going to get some slagging

He'll just have to make the breast of a bad situation.

dr.bollocko Moderator
#18

It's the most natural food you can feed an infant.

I don't see the problem.

But sher whatever. Pass the kid a rusk or whatever other processed shoite they're trying to pass off as healthy these days in case a few ne'erdowells get offended.

17 people have thanked this post
forfuxsake Registered User
#19

Off-topic but ironically women in Saudi Arabia openly breastfeed despite often being fully veiled.

1 person has thanked this post
Eggonyerface Registered User
#20

Some people just prefer draught to bottle

2 people have thanked this post
My name is URL Registered User
#21

That's a pretty piss poor attempt at a copy and paste

Also the Time cover is there to provoke a reaction. If it was a 3 yo that actually looked like a 3 year old there'd be no such reaction to it. Instead they made sure to get a much older looking kid, and stand him on a chair in order to reach sustenance! I doubt that's how she breastfeeds the kid at home.

It's a load of bollix really.

And I'd definitely suck on her tits.. what's weird about that?!

6 people have thanked this post
El_Dangeroso Awaiting Email Confirmation
#22

Hunter-gatherers breastfeed their kids for minimum of 2 years and up to 5 years. This was likely the case for most of human evolution.

People who think that's weird have a problem.

It's only very recently where the done thing is breastfeed for 6 months then shove the child in a creche. Now that's weird.

19 people have thanked this post
mad m Registered User
#23

That Chick should be in Slydice

My name is URL Registered User
#24

Some of the reaction to this on Twitter is hilarious. People calling it sick & twisted without realising that they themselves are the ones sexualising what is a completely non-sexual relationship between a mother and her child.

If Freud were alive today he'd be sucking his own tit with excitement.

9 people have thanked this post
#25

Weylin said:
wait until the guy is 16-18 ,he is going to get some slagging

He will be getting it long before that I reckon..

laoch na mona Registered User
#26

why breastfeed once a child can eat?

1 person has thanked this post
michellie Registered User
#27

That child is gona be so pissed off when he is older.

grindle Registered User
#28

laoch na mona said:
why breastfeed once a child can eat?


Because it contains the precise nutrients a growing child needs to remain as healthy as possible?
I wouldn't expect anybody to do this, definitely not once teeth start mangling things (gums're bad enough), but this histrionic crowd-sourced disgust is so, so repulsively Victorian (not aimed at you, laoch).

#29

No bloody way, my little fella has gums like razor blades, that's bad enough, would you chance teeth!

laoch na mona Registered User
#30

grindle said:
Because it contains the precise nutrients a growing child needs to remain as healthy as possible?
I wouldn't expect anybody to do this, definitely not once teeth start mangling things (gums're bad enough), but this histrionic crowd-sourced disgust is so, so repulsively Victorian (not aimed at you, laoch).


I was looking at it from a biological view point
mammals wean their young once they can eat we are mammals

Want to share your thoughts?

Login here to discuss!