Can we look forward to you taking every Fox News bullsh!t report seriously from here on in, BB? After all, their ravings are still a lot more sensible than those of John Hill!
What exactly is his point?
Government use media for their own use? Shock Horror!
Prepared Emergency Plan? That's the point of a plan.
Mock anti-terror drill? If Terrorists can think it so can emergency responders.
Bomb on a bus! - Jeeze - how come we didn't think of that!
Bomb on a tube - now how come we didn't consider that!
But completly relevent to his credibility, really why would anyone pay attention to what this guy says...
Again you have stated that you "really don't know anything about the man" so you are in no position to comment on any errors in my reasoning. You have admitted ignorance of the issue, your opinion is worthless.
Are you serious? everyone has preconcieved notions about everything! Its called life.
Answer this - are you saying you have no preconcieved notions about anything?
Right, but my only point is that nothing that Darwin believed, even if he later became a Creationist renders his theory false. Likewise, none of Muad Dib's religious beliefs effects the truth or otherwise of his 7/7 film. Unless they can be demonstrated to be intertwined.
Nobody has shown this to be the case but jumped in with ad-hominen attacks.
Fair point - but they are. His world-view is completely nuts, and this is just another facet of that twisted world-view. If you feel like a trip into insanity, spend an hour on his site reading - say - five or six of his beliefs/CTs/theories. The 7/7 one fits in very comfortably with the rest.
From what you have READ???
It's a film. Have you not even watched it???
Well that's crap for a start. I'd be surprised if I don't link to more "official sources" than anyone else in the forum.
Being a skeptic is fun!
And lest you forget, I am the kook here, surely you have higher standards???
I am not defending him. I am defending logic
OK. But I watched his film years ago. I had no idea who he was at the time and no idea after, other than he was a mildly spoken North of England gentleman. I don't actually remember him bringing attention to himself in any way, or pushing any agenda beyond the supposed inconsistencies in the official 7/7 narrative. Though viewed with the benefit of hindsight I could concieivably reconsider.
Can we be sure he even held these same views he now holds in 2007? On Star Wars etc...
I am not claiming he is credible but that it is wrong to assume that because a person gets claim X wrong that claim Y is de-facto wrong also.
I am in a position to comment on errors in your reasoning if you make errors in your reasoning. You seem to have taken it personally. I apologise if that's the case.
Of course. However, to try to find the truth we should at least try to avoid it, right? You have intentionally opted-in to bias before witnessing the evidence.
Like I said, yes (edit:meant no). I am human.
was there a thread about his arrest on here can anyone remember if this star wars / kill gays /etc came up
Probably more as well.
Because there is plenty of information about what the film is about both on his site and on this thread. From what i've read about the film and the fact that his logic leads him to believe very silly things, I don't see why I should waste my time any more that you should to check whether his Star Wars nonsense is true.
Mexican stand-off - no one will watch the video
You can count me the hell out, last Muad'Dib video two weeks ago I almost had a brain aneurysm
Correction, there is nothing on this thread regarding the content of the film. However, I did check the site and I hadn't realised that there was a transcript.
From this I learned that in the entire film transcrpt there is:
- No mention of "Jesus"
- No mention of "Jew"
- No mention of Hitler
- No mention of "Star Wars"
- No mention of "gay"
- No mention of "homosexual"
- No mention of "McKellan"
So what exactly do you have a problem with?
Well you should at least watch the film or not comment considering that it is the topic of conversation.
Please note: Due to having to avoid the "Mark of the Beast" we now
only accept cash.
nearly choked with laughing when I read that
I don't have a problem with it per se.
I do find his views hilariously bigoted and silly. And that's why I and most reasonable people don't take him seriously.
But why? You seem to have no issue dismissing his views on Star Wars without even looking into it?
Why is it a problem to bring up the fact that this guy doesn't exactly think straight?