That's a reasonable attitude to have I think. You can go on about how it's a different corporate entity but who follows corporate entities? They'll be wearing the same gear, have the same crest, play in the same stadium. Therefore I don't think it's unreasonable to say they're the same team even if technically they aren't and they are starting from scratch
I still don't think they should be allowed in the SPL though.....
The exodus begins, Rhys McCabe and another unnamed player have lodged objections to transferring to the new club.
Its the definition of delusional
Sone Aluko rejects transfer to Newco
But if it's the same club why should they have to be transferred?
Ah don't worry about that, we'll hear the latest logical excuses on how that is possible soon enough am sure.
Because their contracts are with the company ?
Doesn't mean a thing.
Apparently there have been talks about Rangers only being put in the First Division:
If it's the same club then why is a vote needed for them to play in the SPL?
If you don't know it by now you never will.
Livingston will be rubbing their hands with glee
LOL, they only bought the intellectual property of another company, that doesnt include trophies or history.
Glad you realise it, the trophies and history aren't with the company but with the club, and that club is still there, regardless of the company.
Took you long enough, glad you see it now
Nice try but you fail.
The company and club are intrinsically linked. They are one and the same. All the big clubs are companies these days.
LOL, you are delusional, do you know what intellectual property is? Or are you going to break out google to find out?