tim allen Registered User
#241

Dude111 said:
One might say because CRIMINALS ARE STUPID and always leave things not 100% accurate.....


Humans are incapable of perfection of anything of this magnitude. 911 remains covered up because normal folks won't expose the best evidence.

tim allen Registered User
#242

An opposition would have to explain to a jury how a real plane with dots for engines, and no wings could cast its own shadow in between the rear of tower 1 and west side of tower 2? How could any plane traveling 500 mph circle the towers before crashing into the rear of the building southeast of Tower 1?


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VlD1j-XqxmE&feature=player_embedded

tim allen Registered User
#243

The shadow happened because the drone circled in between and around the south tower. No other reason for it could ever be proved, and Manos's fake footage makes it bona fide.

The shadow is reflected on the west side of tower 2 and possibly the east side of tower 1, confirming the drone literally moved north to south along that west side before finally turning left, east, across the south side.


#244

how do we know it was going at 500 Mph maybe they had air break on Flaps up full which would have slowed the plane down big time..

planes did hit the building... half of new York saw 2 planes and hearing a big bang from the Towers

Dude111 Registered User
#245

They thought they saw planes OR THEY ARE PAID IDIOTS WHO WERE PAID ALOT OF $$$$$$ TO SAY THEY SAW ONE!!


Here are my thoughts of this: WHERE IS THE WRECKAGE OF THE PLANES?? (At all 3 locations)

Why was FLIGHT 175 STILL IN THE AIR after they said it HIT THE SOUTH TOWER??

www.youtube.com/v/jdXGSefI6pM

#246

wat about the ppl who saw the planes crashing into the Towers and they were inside the Tower ??

NO they though they saw a plane ?

people are still dying today from 9/11 why would American attack its own ppl to go into IRAQ for Oil? if they wanted they would have just gone intheir with out any 9/11

tim allen Registered User
#247

Cork24 said:
wat about the ppl who saw the planes crashing into the Towers and they were inside the Tower ??

NO they though they saw a plane ?

people are still dying today from 9/11 why would American attack its own ppl to go into IRAQ for Oil? if they wanted they would have just gone intheir with out any 9/11


I was able capture the bogey as it peeked out and then a quick edit occurs to well after the explosion. These guys did not see a plane and were confused as to how the south tower exploded. There's little doubt they made mention of the object and that audio would've been edited out too. There are countless videos with the impact edited out because they weren't going to insert fake plane images into all of them. You can see him pan to the right when that little bogey caught his eye.



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NHaVijMv5t8&list=PL1C1F97A9B8B8D8AE&index=157&feature=plpp_video

tim allen Registered User
#248

The 911 commission, properly and logically concluded that 175 had to fly over New York Bay in its final seconds, therefore, any object seen west of the towers could not be flight 175. The shadow between the towers seen in three broadcasts is that of the drone because the official flight path, logically could not have flown east of T1 in its final 3-5 seconds, which is required to create the shadow.

Any crapologist who uses the unofficial flight path of 175 cirlcing Newark, is ignoring the official flight path, which has 175 nowhere near it, whether north or south of it in flight. Officially, fake 175 never circled Newark, but most of New Jersey, and anyone who suggests it, is a liar.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YJX2fStDMo4&list=PL1C1F97A9B8B8D8AE&index=143&feature=plpp_video


stoneill Registered User
#249

What is Tim Allen trying to show with ALL his video's?

Look like a plane slamming into a building to me.

2 people have thanked this post
Jonny7 Registered User
#250

tim
The truth is the lie, and the lie is the truth. No commercial airliner impacted either tower on 911, but small remote controlled drones were the real weapons which ignited bombs planted inside the buildings.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EFiEgwLQVJk

That's a full sized aircraft hitting the building.

1 person has thanked this post
Penn Registered User
#251

Tim Allen banned for not engaging others in discussion.

4 people have thanked this post
#252

people are still dying today from 9/11 why would American attack its own ppl to go into IRAQ for Oil? if they wanted they would have just gone intheir with out any 9/11 this is a quote from a post up the page!! messed up the quote part!

Why did they let the Lusitania cross the atlantic even though the Germans specifically told em we'll sink it! to get the public onside to allow entry to WW1

Why did they lie about not spotting the japs crossing the pacific to Pearl.
to get the public onside to get entry to WW2

Why did they lie about the battleship being attacked prior to Vietnam
to get the public on side to get entry to VN
incidently Colon powell (yes colon not colin) was a LT in Vietnam and was one of those who took part in the cover up of the mai lea masacre( mai lea spelling!) Naturally he was promoted!!!!!

why did they{USA} fabricate false fotage of sadams forces lined up to go into kuwait? to get public onside to get entry to iraq.
Colon powell later came out to confirm they made the pics up!!!!! looks like the habits learned murdering people in VN stood to him.

So why did they "allow attacks" of a different nature in 1 and 2 above on their public. i simply think they hold their people with contempt.

i think its clear they like making money from the WAR machine

#253

tim allen said:
You can see him pan to the right when that little bogey caught his eye.


It was a bogey or bird sh!t, but whatever it was was on the window pane and it's embarrassingly obvious.

#254

Captain Bligh said:

incidently Colon powell (yes colon not colin)

Nope, Colin Powell.

#255

Jonny7 said:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EFiEgwLQVJk

That's a full sized aircraft hitting the building.


I'm not not a proponent of the no planes theory, but video these days is hardly evidence..

Want to share your thoughts?

Login here to discuss!