Fluffybums Registered User
#8,476

J C said:
Feel free to laugh ... nervously ... it is clear that the Earth is quite 'young' ... and many extinct animals, like the Triceratops were alive contemporaneously with Man.
Even 'old agers' ... like Evolutionists freely admit that many species alive today lived contemporaneously with Dinosaurs. They call them'living fossils' because they haven't changed since then.
... and given the fact that it was less than 10,000 years this isn't all that surprising!!!

:
LOL, ROL, LOL, ROL, LOL, ROL,LOL, ROL

#8,477

J C said:
Feel free to laugh ... nervously ... it is clear that the Earth is quite 'young'


4.5 billion years old.. Not sure where you're getting your definition for young out of.

J C said:

... and many extinct animals, like the Triceratops were alive contemporaneously with Man.


Which is why homo sapiens have never once been found at the same geological layer as dinosaurs?

J C said:

Even 'old agers' ... like Evolutionists freely admit that many species alive today lived contemporaneously with Dinosaurs. They call them'living fossils' because they haven't changed since then.


The crocodilia family might be as old as the dinosaurs, but no crocodile that lived alongside the dinosaurs lives today. It's descendants do. That's why you don't see guys like this anymore:



Now - we're tried to explain this to you a million times, but you just don't seem to understand it.


J C said:

... and given the fact that it was less than 10,000 years this isn't all that surprising!!!


That is not a fact. When you're willing to demonstrate to us a testable, and repeatable, peer-reviewed dating methodology that backs up these claims - let us know and we'll see. Until then - we'll continue to laugh at you.

1 person has thanked this post
Galvasean Registered User
#8,478

joseph brand said:
Question: Did the church, or at least some of them, pull a u-turn on the topic of dinosaurs?

I thought the church's stance was that god put the bones in the ground in different hiding places for us to find. But now they say that humans and dinosaurs co-existed? Or is that just some crazy baptist/ evangelical churches?

Are these ideas mutually exclusive?


They realised kids like dinoaurs so segwayed them into their museums to maximize profit.

1 person has thanked this post
robindch Moderator
#8,479

J C said:
Prof Dawkins [...] admitted that he doesn't have any specific evidence for W2M Evolution (or if he has ... he hasn't written it in his books)
You will recall from your own words that Dawkins said nothing of the kind. He did not say "that he doesn't have any specific evidence" for the evolutionary origins of mankind. He did say that in none of his previous books was such specific evidence "explicitly set out, and that this was a serious gap that I needed to close."

I don't expect you to read this book, or for you to understand it if you did.

But on this forum, you are expected not to lie.

3 people have thanked this post
Barr125 Registered User
#8,480

J C said:
Feel free to laugh ... nervously ... it is clear that the Earth is quite 'young' ... and many extinct animals, like the Triceratops were alive contemporaneously with Man.
Even 'old agers' ... like Evolutionists, freely admit that many species alive today lived contemporaneously with Dinosaurs. They call them 'living fossils' because they haven't changed since then.
... and given the fact that it was less than 10,000 years ago, this isn't all that surprising!!!
... so why all the surprise that Humans also lived alongside Dinosaurs as well?



So...you're really going to stick with the Flintstones Hypothesis???

Galvasean Registered User
#8,481

................ YABADABBADOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

1 person has thanked this post
Doctor Jimbob Registered User
#8,482

Which is why homo sapiens have never once been found at the same geological layer as dinosaurs?


This.
If you can't give a sensible answer to this J C you have no business commenting on this thread again.

dead one Banned
#8,483

Doctor Jimbob said:
This.
If you can't give a sensible answer to this J C you have no business commenting on this thread again.

hi doc
How did Homo sapiens become extinct? I mean, Is there any Homo sapiens around.

Delirium cosmic voice
#8,484

dead one said:
hi doc
How did Homo sapiens become extinct? I mean, Is there any Homo sapiens around.

just when you think this thread has hit bottom, the floor collapses!


homo sapiens aren't extinct, homo sapiens is another name for humans.

1 person has thanked this post
dead one Banned
#8,485

koth said:


homo sapiens aren't extinct, homo sapiens is another name for humans.

hi koth
isn't homo sapiens another name for Chimps?

Delirium cosmic voice
#8,486

dead one said:
hi koth
isn't homo sapiens another name for Chimps?


no.

dead one Banned
#8,487

koth said:
no.

then, where is common ancestor? Who are common ancestors

Delirium cosmic voice
#8,488

dead one said:
then, where is common ancestor? Who are common ancestors


Check out these posts by dlofnep and oldrnwisr if you honestly want to know the answer to that question.

dead one Banned
#8,489

koth said:
Check out these posts by dlofnep and oldrnwisr if you honestly want to know the answer to that question.

Right, i will check it, thanks, Now more questions
Will human become extinct or evolve into another forms / creatures? For more detail check this link

http://masseffect.wikia.com/wiki/Races

shizz Registered User
#8,490

dead one said:
hi koth
isn't homo sapiens another name for Chimps?

Really..

dead one said:
then, where is common ancestor? Who are common ancestors

really..
dead one said:
Right, i will check it, thanks, Now more questions
Will human become extinct or evolve into another forms / creatures? For more detail check this link

http://masseffect.wikia.com/wiki/Races


REALLY awful trolling.

1 person has thanked this post

Want to share your thoughts?

Login here to discuss!