Johner Registered User
#601

geurrp the yard said:
Does anyone else not think the prices for this fight are a bit steep.Would love to go but im not paying mad money for it.


not really. if you get a 50-90euro. sure you would spend that on a night out! its fairly good value.

spongeman Registered User
#602

Johner said:
not really. if you get a 50-90euro. sure you would spend that on a night out! its fairly good value.



It is. i went for the 90 euros as I wanted to be a bit nearer.

Should be an interesting fight, points perhaps.

Vintagekits Registered User
#603

spongeman said:
It is. i went for the 90 euros as I wanted to be a bit nearer.

Should be an interesting fight, points perhaps.


Points = Dunne win. KO = Poonsawat win. IMO!

unknown13 Registered User
#604

geurrp the yard said:
Does anyone else not think the prices for this fight are a bit steep.Would love to go but im not paying mad money for it.


I think the prices are very fair. I went to UFC and the ticket was 75 but the 02 is a great venue so you get a good view in the 60 seats

Goose81 Registered User
#605

Yeah but in UFC you get to see top fighters,90 euro for Dunne is taking the piss.

It should be 40 at max,the way they market these things you would think you are seeing Hatton Mayweather 2.

Whenwhat you are actually seeing is the fake champion in his division fighting a chump.

colly10 Registered User
#606

itouchmyself said:
Jesus a company trying to make a profit what next!!!


6.35 is totally taking the piss in fairness

unknown13 Registered User
#607

Goose81, you dont know what your talking about.
Dunne is fighting a Thai that is ranked in the top 5 in the World for the Original World title.
40 max for a tix, I would love to pay that price for a tix since Im a student but prices will not be that low because its a World title fight.

#608



touchingyourself - were you on the beer last night??

itouchmyself Registered User
#609

john47832 said:


touchingyourself - were you on the beer last night??



.... Vodka's bad...

spongeman Registered User
#610

Goose81 said:
Yeah but in UFC you get to see top fighters,90 euro for Dunne is taking the piss.

It should be 40 at max,the way they market these things you would think you are seeing Hatton Mayweather 2.

Whenwhat you are actually seeing is the fake champion in his division fighting a chump.


This fake champ came back from being destroyed in a round to being knocked down twice in a world title fight to winning the title.

This chump has lost once in nearly 40 fights.

We must be talking about 2 completely different people.

itouchmyself Registered User
#611

spongeman said:
This fake champ came back from being destroyed in a round to being knocked down twice in a world title fight to winning the title.

This chump has lost once in nearly 40 fights.

We must be talking about 2 completely different people.



40 fights you's must be alright this thread is about Bernard Dunne....
because he hasnt even had 30 fights!

Says it all really... if you think he's the best in the world at that weight believe it but its obvious you have not a clue if thats what you think!

p.s. Goose81 ufc my arse

Vintagekits Registered User
#612

Goose81 said:
Yeah but in UFC you get to see top fighters,90 euro for Dunne is taking the piss.

It should be 40 at max,the way they market these things you would think you are seeing Hatton Mayweather 2.

Whenwhat you are actually seeing is the fake champion in his division fighting a chump.


deluded 12 year old!

"in UFC you get to see top fighters" - eh naw! they are pretty **** actually and get paid **** all - but lets not turn this into a UFC v Boxing thread please.

"Whenwhat you are actually seeing is the fake champion in his division fighting a chump" - Poonsawat is rated higher in the division by The Ring and BoxRec than Dunne and only the "legit champions" above him.

Now toddle off and watch Royal Rumble!

Big Ears Registered User
#613

itouchmyself said:
40 fights you's must be alright this thread is about Bernard Dunne....
because he hasnt even had 30 fights!


Have you confused yourself, the person being referred to as the 'chump' aka one of the top Super-Bantamweights in the World is the one with nearly 40 fights. No one said Dunne had nearly 40.

itouchmyself Registered User
#614

Big Ears said:
Have you confused yourself, the person being referred to as the 'chump' aka one of the top Super-Bantamweights in the World is the one with nearly 40 fights. No one said Dunne had nearly 40.


Yeah I read it wrong.

spongeman Registered User
#615

itouchmyself said:
40 fights you's must be alright this thread is about Bernard Dunne....
because he hasnt even had 30 fights!

Says it all really... if you think he's the best in the world at that weight believe it but its obvious you have not a clue if thats what you think!

p.s. Goose81 ufc my arse



Try and learn to read my friend, you referred to the challenger as a chump. I said the chump had lost once in nearly 40 fights, which is true. He has fought 39 times. I lived in Thailand for a few years and saw the way they go about their business, this guy is no fool.

Where did I say that he was the best in the world at that weight ? D'ont put words in my mouth.

Want to share your thoughts?

Login here to discuss!