Boards.ie uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more x
Post Reply  
 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
14-05-2012, 11:01   #1
karaokeman
Registered User
 
karaokeman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Leixlip, Kildare
Posts: 2,693
The Stone Roses, 23 years on....

So its less than a month before history is made and the Stone Roses are back on the touring scene to play all those great tunes, mainly from their first album.

Some of us are excited and getting ready to finally have a chance to see the four-piece (including myself) so I just thought I would start discussion.

What is everyone's thoughts on how that first album was such an influential record? I would argue without it there would have been no britpop movement and British guitar music would have been drastically different without that album being such a landmark record.

Blur and Suede released their debut albums in 1991 and 1993 respectively, and as good as they were, both bands carried on from what the Stone Roses brought.
karaokeman is offline  
Advertisement
14-05-2012, 15:12   #2
Suas11
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 1,022
They're my favourite band and I never ever thought that I would ever get a chance to see them play live so I'm obviously very excited about this.

Anyway, I think they're debut album (along with The La's only album) were hugely influential on the britpop music of the 90's. I think Noel Gallagher even said that when he heard the Stone Roses he knew that he had to have a career in music. Also, Liam decided he wanted to be a frontman after going to a Roses' gig. So, you could kinda say that there might never have been an Oasis if it wasn't for the Roses.
Suas11 is online now  
Thanks from:
14-05-2012, 18:23   #3
mosstin
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 605
Quote:
Originally Posted by karaokeman View Post
So its less than a month before history is made and the Stone Roses are back on the touring scene to play all those great tunes, mainly from their first album.

Some of us are excited and getting ready to finally have a chance to see the four-piece (including myself) so I just thought I would start discussion.

What is everyone's thoughts on how that first album was such an influential record? I would argue without it there would have been no britpop movement and British guitar music would have been drastically different without that album being such a landmark record.

Blur and Suede released their debut albums in 1991 and 1993 respectively, and as good as they were, both bands carried on from what the Stone Roses brought.
I think the reason that it's made such an impact was because it pretty much launced a thousand bands in its wake. Given that the British music scene was relatively uninspiring at the time - a nascent MBV, underwhelming C86 scene to name but two - TSR was a breath of fresh air in terms of both ambition and being a bona fide pop gem.
That said the reunion is sad, given the vitality of the original line-up ("The past was yours but the future's mine") - the four of them down on their luck, looking for one more big payout before going their separate ways quietly in a year's time. Wonderful record, a once great band, should have left the legacy intact.
mosstin is offline  
Thanks from:
14-05-2012, 20:01   #4
karaokeman
Registered User
 
karaokeman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Leixlip, Kildare
Posts: 2,693
Quote:
Originally Posted by mosstin View Post
I think the reason that it's made such an impact was because it pretty much launced a thousand bands in its wake. Given that the British music scene was relatively uninspiring at the time - a nascent MBV, underwhelming C86 scene to name but two - TSR was a breath of fresh air in terms of both ambition and being a bona fide pop gem.
Pretty much agree with most of this, I assume by MBV you mean My Bloody Valentine, yeah?

Quote:
Originally Posted by mosstin View Post
That said the reunion is sad, given the vitality of the original line-up ("The past was yours but the future's mine") - the four of them down on their luck, looking for one more big payout before going their separate ways quietly in a year's time. Wonderful record, a once great band, should have left the legacy intact.
I'm not sure, they will be so quick to split again, there's a third album in the works so they will at least get that out after the tour and possibly do another world tour after to promote the album. Who knows, the new album could be quite good.
karaokeman is offline  
14-05-2012, 21:10   #5
Dotsey
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Átha Cliath
Posts: 1,383
I'm more interested in the album than the tour. They only had one good album imo so it will be interesting to see if they can gel again after such a long period away.

I don't think there's many bands that have done it in the studio after such a long period away although I did like the The Verve's last album in 2008 but they were only away for 10 years not over 20

Last edited by Dotsey; 14-05-2012 at 23:42.
Dotsey is offline  
Advertisement
14-05-2012, 22:47   #6
Bodhidharma
Registered User
 
Bodhidharma's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Douglas
Posts: 942
Making history is a tad strong, digging up the past would be more accurate. They are irrelevant now. No band can break up for that length of time and be anything other than a nostalgia act.
Bodhidharma is offline  
19-05-2012, 21:41   #7
ainm usaideoir
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 22
I think its wrong to say the stone roses are irrelevant , the hype created by the bands re-forming only cemented the fact that their music never really went away , I am very much looking forward to the gig I only hope John Squire is on form ! Ian Browne is a front man with attitude but singing live isn't his strong point and Squire's guitar playing can make up for that . I actually think the second album was a good one , its very rare for any band to have a better second album and its also fair to mention the single releases either side of the debut album were classics in their own right ! . can't wait for the phoenix park gig , only downside is it's on a Thursday .
ainm usaideoir is offline  
19-05-2012, 22:40   #8
nyarlothothep
Registered User
 
nyarlothothep's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: multi dimensional space
Posts: 4,258
Yeah, I don't get all the hate for the second album either, it's pretty good, I hope they play some material off it at the gig.
nyarlothothep is offline  
20-05-2012, 00:13   #9
Batesy
Registered User
 
Batesy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Wicklow
Posts: 722
The Second Coming is pretty much the most mis-understood album of all time I reckon.

It's absolute quality and it's only downfall was that back in 94 people werent ready for it. It was definetly ahead of it's time.

The fact that Ian Brown was a bit miffed with the mixing of the record probably gave a lot of people a reason to hate it. A bit like, "if HE isn't really happy with it , it must be ****'

I've listened to it again recently from start to finish and it's a gem.

Starts off setting the mood, makes you think and then when you're just about ready the tunes kick in.

Any album with, Love Spreads, Tightrope, Good times, Ten Story Love Song, Tears, How Do You Sleep, Your Star Will Shine is alright in my book.

And thats 7 out of 12 tracks. The rest are still decent but fillers none the less.

Can't wait for the gig.
Batesy is offline  
(2) thanks from:
Advertisement
21-05-2012, 10:19   #10
Can'tseeme
Registered User
 
Can'tseeme's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Belfast
Posts: 589
Agreed. The Second Coming is quality, never understood the negative press it got at the time. I'm hoping we hear several songs from the album at Phoenix Park.
Can'tseeme is offline  
21-05-2012, 19:18   #11
cloptrop
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 2,847
I think so young was their best song and they try distance themselves from it now . It makes me feel they dont play it anymore.
cloptrop is offline  
21-05-2012, 20:41   #12
Suas11
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 1,022
Quote:
Originally Posted by cloptrop View Post
I think so young was their best song and they try distance themselves from it now . It makes me feel they dont play it anymore.
You think So Young is better than I Am The Resurrection? To each their own, I guess.
Suas11 is online now  
22-05-2012, 12:54   #13
cloptrop
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 2,847
Quote:
Originally Posted by Suas11 View Post
You think So Young is better than I Am The Resurrection? To each their own, I guess.
Yeah Id think I wanna be adored , and fools gold are better than I am the ressurection too .
She bangs the drums , Sally Cinnamon .
Try not to take offence when your favourite song is not my favourite song , I think the happy mondays were alot better too , but lets not offend anyone.
cloptrop is offline  
22-05-2012, 13:01   #14
kippy
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Galway
Posts: 9,659
I got introduced to this band in 98, first year in college.
Took me a while to get into some of the tunes but both albums, in my opinion, are up there with the best. Strangely enough I prefer The Second Coming and to this day it is still the only album I continue to listen to every now and again from start to finish.
I suppose the tunes remind me of those heady college days and indeed the experience of listening to a "new" (to me) band that I was blown away with. Indeed I remember some of the lads in the house were able to do some great renditions of the tunes on those albums.
Then I heard a recording of them live - boy, that was disappointing, mainly because Ian Brown didn't sound at all like he could sing (I doubt much has changed)
All that aside, they were the start of a major era in music and numerous bands have been inspired by them.

That being said, I always wanted to go to a gig but thought I would never have the chance, so getting that chance is great. Whatever happens in July, it will be memorable.
kippy is offline  
22-05-2012, 14:25   #15
Suas11
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 1,022
Quote:
Originally Posted by cloptrop View Post
Yeah Id think I wanna be adored , and fools gold are better than I am the ressurection too .
She bangs the drums , Sally Cinnamon .
Try not to take offence when your favourite song is not my favourite song , I think the happy mondays were alot better too , but lets not offend anyone.
Ah, I wasn't offended lol. I was just surprised, that's all.
Suas11 is online now  
Thanks from:
Post Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Remove Text Formatting
Bold
Italic
Underline

Insert Image
Wrap [QUOTE] tags around selected text
 
Decrease Size
Increase Size
Please sign up or log in to join the discussion

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search