| 18-04-2012, 18:22 | #46 |
|
Registered User
![]() |
The first one is the best one alright. I liked The Subtle Knife as well but The Amber Spyglass gets worse and worse the more of it you read.
|
|
|
|
Advertisement
|
|
|
| 20-04-2012, 18:18 | #48 |
|
Registered User
![]() |
|
|
|
|
Advertisement
|
|
|
| 20-04-2012, 23:52 | #51 |
|
Registered User
![]() |
Please don't let it put you off Hemingway altogether. "The Old Man And The Sea" is fantastic.
|
|
|
| (3) thanks from: |
| 22-04-2012, 16:10 | #52 |
|
Registered User
![]() |
Samuel Beckett's Molloy. Parts of the first monologue are laugh out loud funny, and I honestly felt I was reading something truly different. But it is almost entirely void of paragraphs, and has sentences that go on for pages (seriously!). Meaning I was very quickly out of my comfort zone. I'm sure if you 'understand' literature you could wax on about what it achieves, what it represents, etc. But for someone looking for an introduction to his work it's probably best to start with his plays.
|
|
|
| 22-04-2012, 16:20 | #53 |
|
Registered User
![]() |
When I opened this thread I was terrified I'd be shot for mentioning slaughterhouse 5 and catch: 22, good to see I'm not alone!
I recently went back to reread lotr, it kinda made me sad to see how much I've grown to dislike a book I used to love. |
|
|
|
Advertisement
|
|
|
| 24-04-2012, 23:21 | #55 |
|
Registered User
![]() |
I think it's highly rated by some but I found 'Moby Dick' very boring indeed. I just could not get in to it at all. Long, meandering explanations of whales and the like just did not do it for me. Where was the battle of wills between Ahab and MD that I had heard so much about? Answer: There was none that I could see. One chapter interested me in the whole book, the final one, and I think that was because I was so happy to know that it was finally ending after spending a long time struggling through it.
|
|
|
| 24-04-2012, 23:25 | #56 |
|
Registered User
![]() |
"Of Mice And Men", I thought was overrated. It's quite a good story but just not a classic, which seems to be the consensus.
I've always been skeptical of "great" American authors anyway. I seem to think America being the new kid on the block regarding world culture, it wanted to lay claim to having great artists. |
|
|
| 25-04-2012, 01:41 | #58 | ||
|
Registered User
![]() |
Quote:
O Brien is amazing!!!! Quote:
"David Mitchell entices his readers onto a rollercoaster, and at first they wonder if they want to get off. Then - at least in my case - they can't bear the journey to end.' (AS Byatt, Guardian )" |
||
|
|
| (2) thanks from: |
| 25-04-2012, 16:09 | #59 |
|
Registered User
![]() |
I really don't like Nick Hornby, all his characters are so unlikeable, but I have only read High Fidelity, How to be Good and A Long Way Down.
Everyone talks about how hilarious he is but I just don't see it, there are a few good one liners but he really does not impress me. |
|
|
| 25-04-2012, 23:19 | #60 |
|
Registered User
![]() |
So everyone keeps telling me. I've read 'At Swim-Two-Birds' and 'The Various Lives of Keats and Chapman/The Brother' and I hated both of them. Maybe I'm missing something so I've decided to give the honourable gentleman one more go with 'The Third Policeman' and if that doesn't do it then I'm afraid I'll forever be on the outside looking in at all the O Brien fans. I'm keeping my fingers crossed that this will be the one to open my eyes to his supposed brilliance. Sorry this is a bit OT but what is the winking eye in your post supposed to signify? After the mis-spelling of the word 'lose' as 'loose', for me this has to be the most annoying thing on internet forums. Edit: Not having a go at you particularly wilkie, I just find the use of that particular smilie very annoying and was wondering what was your purpose in using it? What are you trying to convey by putting it in your post? Last edited by Monkeybonkers; 25-04-2012 at 23:46. |
|
|