Boards.ie uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more x
Post Reply  
 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
21-02-2012, 15:14   #16
Byron85
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Cork
Posts: 1,399
Quote:
Originally Posted by x43r0 View Post
Is there much change needed? I mean, expenses are common in any large organisation for clients and in-house social events


I know some might use the term "Overly lavish" but when things like this occur so sparingly then I don't see the harm.

I'm not opposed to cutting expenses a little but not to the point where the best you can afford is to give people a can of fanta and a sausage roll and tell them they're having fun.
A total account of all expenses incurred by the Guild, which is freely available to the student body. As far as I know, the accounts that are published, which is happening in 5 weeks time, only have the totals, not the various items which make up the totals. I'm open to correction on that though.
Byron85 is offline  
Advertisement
21-02-2012, 15:33   #17
x43r0
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: London
Posts: 2,220
Quote:
Originally Posted by Byron85 View Post
A total account of all expenses incurred by the Guild, which is freely available to the student body. As far as I know, the accounts that are published, which is happening in 5 weeks time, only have the totals, not the various items which make up the totals. I'm open to correction on that though.

No you're right, they do present them as totals. But I don't see why if someone picked a total called say "Entertainments" and asked for a further breakdown they couldn't present that. Shouldn't be a problem like, the totals have to come from somewhere so producing a finer grain of account should be viable
x43r0 is offline  
21-02-2012, 15:42   #18
thebigcheese22
Registered User
 
thebigcheese22's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: In my PC...Help! Failing that - Cork
Posts: 1,365
This is Jerry Larkin, author of one-half of the article mentioned in that Guild response. Just a few clarifications:

"I would like to point out that only once during this investigation was the Guild Executive contacted for any purpose and that was at the print deadline." - This is severely misleading and follows the general tone of the response in questioning the integrity of Motley Magazine. In order to make sure that we were putting out an article with few errors, we waited until we were happy with the article before seeking a response from the Guild. The Guild had time to send a lengthy threatening email to us, and yet did not issue a response then. Even with their response, they have not directly issued evidence to support their claims. As mentioned by a few posters, publishing their expenses from the year questioned should have been at the top of the list of responses. (That is beside the point that these expenses should be a lot more transparent)

The response also doesn't mention the fact that the Vice President of the Guild tried to get the printing of the magazine cancelled on the day we went to print. This resulted in the magazine being delayed to the evening of Thursday, meaning that students had less of a chance to read it.

>mod snip< posting is supposed to be anonymous

"It ought to be made clear that the expenses referred to were not spent by this year’s Guild Executive and such expenses, if they were indeed spent, would not be something that would be approved by this year’s Guild Executive."

"As outlined above, the Guild Executive feels that the amount of work put in by the Officers throughout the year is considerable and that this reward can be justified, of course up to a reasonable point." - One presumes that buying a bottle of champagne passes this point.

Also the final paragraph questioning the whole integrity of the magazine is extremely troublesome. We don't claim that the magazine is perfect and we will completely own up to factual mistakes we made. However, it is extremely difficult to get the full facts when the Guild acts in such an adversarial manner. The ability of student media to question how student bodies are run should always be extremely important to every student, who pays a lot of money in attending the university. With this article we were looking to inform students of the running of a body which has control of so much of their money and which has such an important role in college life. We were also hoping to start a debate on how money is spent, especially so given that funding to third level is being severly cut. I am actually disappointed in the personal level of many attacks on behalf of the Guild, considering we mentioned no names in our article.

Last edited by rebel girl 15; 22-02-2012 at 17:11.
thebigcheese22 is offline  
21-02-2012, 16:18   #19
x43r0
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: London
Posts: 2,220
Firstly I haven't even mentioned your magazine in this thread so far let alone question it's integrity.


As for that story you wrote:

Taxi claims: Bull****. The guild has an account with a taxi firm that's run by quoting a code. The only person who had that code was the societies officer who runs the desk downstairs (I won't sully his name in this thread because google is always watching).

An Scolaire account claims: Bull****. Yes the guild had access to that but it was only ever used to buy stationary for the hub as required. The account record would show that. Besides, are you serious? Where's the incentive to misappropriate stationary ffs I know we're talking about student's but come on like

The meal? Absolutely it was expensive. You don't feed and drink 12 people and keep the bill low unless you've got the messiah and a few loaves of bread handy. The champagne for the record was a bottle of brut which runs at €69 in soho not the €200 which was ridiculously stated in your story.

The base of your article is hearsay seemingly coming from your anonymous source fúcked off from the guild after foing sh1te all for 3 months and pissed away a valuable student sabbatical someone more deserving should have had in the first place
x43r0 is offline  
21-02-2012, 16:58   #20
Achtung!
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 21
Quote:
Originally Posted by x43r0 View Post


The meal? Absolutely it was expensive. You don't feed and drink 12 people and keep the bill low unless you've got the messiah and a few loaves of bread handy. The champagne for the record was a bottle of brut which runs at €69 in soho not the €200 which was ridiculously stated in your story.
€69 is still a ridiculous price for a bottle of wine...
Achtung! is offline  
Thanks from:
Advertisement
21-02-2012, 17:09   #21
x43r0
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: London
Posts: 2,220
Quote:
Originally Posted by Achtung! View Post
€69 is still a ridiculous price for a bottle of wine...
I totally accept that and not trying to excuse it but there were no more than one bought
x43r0 is offline  
21-02-2012, 17:21   #22
Brethitmanhart
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 233
Quote:
Originally Posted by x43r0 View Post
Firstly I haven't even mentioned your magazine in this thread so far let alone question it's integrity.

As for that story you wrote:

Taxi claims: Bull****. The guild has an account with a taxi firm that's run by quoting a code. The only person who had that code was the societies officer who runs the desk downstairs (I won't sully his name in this thread because google is always watching).

An Scolaire account claims: Bull****. Yes the guild had access to that but it was only ever used to buy stationary for the hub as required. The account record would show that. Besides, are you serious? Where's the incentive to misappropriate stationary ffs I know we're talking about student's but come on like

The meal? Absolutely it was expensive. You don't feed and drink 12 people and keep the bill low unless you've got the messiah and a few loaves of bread handy. The champagne for the record was a bottle of brut which runs at €69 in soho not the €200 which was ridiculously stated in your story.

The base of your article is hearsay seemingly coming from your anonymous source fúcked off from the guild after foing sh1te all for 3 months and pissed away a valuable student sabbatical someone more deserving should have had in the first place
How is it hearsay? People who do not understand what hearsay means should stop using it, there was not one single example of hearsay in that piece.

Taxi Claims - all that your point proves is that if you wanted to order a taxi through the guild you could ask that fella to ring and quote a guild code which would charge the taxi to the guild account. It doesn't mean a person could not have got a taxi on a night for social reasons, kept the receipt and potentially claimed this back by producing the receipt as an expense.
I'm not suggesting this did happen, I'm just making the point that your explanation doesn't actually prove it's bull**** at all.

Scolaire - Again doesn't prove it's bull****, just claims it is so.

Meal - if the champagne was a different price could the guild not just release the receipt?
If the figure is incorrect It wouldn't effect Motleys journalistic integrity one bit as the information Motley received was from a first hand witness at the dinner, if he lied or was mistaken then it's on him, as far as I'm concerned the guild should be proving otherwise.
Brethitmanhart is offline  
21-02-2012, 17:41   #23
x43r0
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: London
Posts: 2,220
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brethitmanhart View Post
Taxi Claims - all that your point proves is that if you wanted to order a taxi through the guild you could ask that fella to ring and quote a guild code which would charge the taxi to the guild account.
Are you saying a UCC staff member knowingly misappropiated student money on personal taxis?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Brethitmanhart View Post
It doesn't mean a person could not have got a taxi on a night for social reasons, kept the receipt and potentially claimed this back by producing the receipt as an expense.
I'm not suggesting this did happen, I'm just making the point that your explanation doesn't actually prove it's bull**** at all.
That's not possible. Any guild related event that would require the use of a taxi would be well known amongst the group and the staff in the office. Any claim out of the ordinary would be sniffed out immediately and the office wouldn't pay out on it

Quote:
Originally Posted by Brethitmanhart View Post
Scolaire - Again doesn't prove it's bull****, just claims it is so.
Claims what is so? That the guild has an account in that shop? We're just playing my word against yours here

Quote:
Originally Posted by Brethitmanhart View Post
Meal - if the champagne was a different price could the guild not just release the receipt?
If the figure is incorrect It wouldn't effect Motleys journalistic integrity one bit as the information Motley received was from a first hand witness at the dinner, if he lied or was mistaken then it's on him, as far as I'm concerned the guild should be proving otherwise.
Go in and ask for a receipt then, just try a bit of manners this time rather than demanding instant accounts.

As far as I'm concerned your first hand witness has fúck all credibility given thier actions during their brief stint on the guild and subsequent thievery of a sabbatical.

I don't see how anyboday with a lick of sense would give weight to their stories given the acrimonious circumstances of their departure from the guild

Last edited by x43r0; 21-02-2012 at 17:43.
x43r0 is offline  
21-02-2012, 17:56   #24
Byron85
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Cork
Posts: 1,399
Ok, one thing needs to be cleared up. I know who the "source" is (don't know them personally) but what i'm curious about is what did they do that was so wrong during their tenure on the Guild? I haven't been told anything about that.
Byron85 is offline  
Advertisement
22-02-2012, 17:00   #25
rebel girl 15
El President!
 
rebel girl 15's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Cork
Posts: 13,730
After discussing this with the other mods, we have decided to re-open the thread.

You may discuss the contents of the article and the response as posted above, but any posts that we feel are unfounded allegations against the guild will be deleted and the poster banned

As this is a thread that has already caused friction, any posts deemed to be attacks on the poster will be deleted immediately and the poster banned

I can completely understand why the thread was deleted in the first place - it appeared to be a first time poster trying to cause hassle.

If the thread goes off the specific topics mentioned, I will also re-close the topic
rebel girl 15 is offline  
Thanks from:
22-02-2012, 17:42   #26
heliocentrist
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 132
Quote:
Originally Posted by x43r0 View Post
fúcked off from the guild after foing sh1te all for 3 months and pissed away a valuable student sabbatical someone more deserving should have had in the first place
Valuable? It's an unpaid sabbatical position, someone who takes it doesn't have to pay a registration fee but there's no stipend involved. No one applied to take an unpaid sabbatical this year (as far as I know?) and the only other person who applied last year failed their course. I doubt the latter would have even applied otherwise. It'll probably never even happen again.

Last edited by heliocentrist; 22-02-2012 at 17:44.
heliocentrist is offline  
22-02-2012, 19:41   #27
pirateninja
Registered User
 
pirateninja's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: London
Posts: 137
Quote:
Valuable? It's an unpaid sabbatical position, someone who takes it doesn't have to pay a registration fee but there's no stipend involved. No one applied to take an unpaid sabbatical this year (as far as I know?) and the only other person who applied last year failed their course. I doubt the latter would have even applied otherwise. It'll probably never even happen again.
You're wrong about people applying for the unpaid sabbatical, two people did.

As for people applying last year. 3 people applied and 1 person then withdrew their application after said ex guild member and friends sat down and explained why he deserved it more. Maybe it won't happen again but you could say the guild will never spend 69 euro on a bottle of wine again and that makes this all irrelevant.
pirateninja is offline  
22-02-2012, 22:07   #28
heliocentrist
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 132
ok who applied for unpaid sabbaticals this year and which of them is doing it? Fair play to them btw, not a cent in reward and all that work!

You're talking crap about talking people out of it last year, but i dont doubt that you are a sock puppet.

69 euro... Dont make me laugh kid. Lies, damned lies and Socs guild ex-presidents.

Last edited by heliocentrist; 22-02-2012 at 22:16.
heliocentrist is offline  
22-02-2012, 22:38   #29
titan18
Registered User
 
titan18's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Cork
Posts: 4,675
Quote:
Originally Posted by heliocentrist View Post
ok who applied for unpaid sabbaticals this year and which of them is doing it? Fair play to them btw, not a cent in reward and all that work!

You're talking crap about talking people out of it last year, but i dont doubt that you are a sock puppet.

69 euro... Dont make me laugh kid. Lies, damned lies and Socs guild ex-presidents.
Are you saying you know more than guild members and people heavily involved in societies?
titan18 is offline  
22-02-2012, 22:56   #30
heliocentrist
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 132
....

Last edited by heliocentrist; 22-02-2012 at 23:00.
heliocentrist is offline  
Post Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Remove Text Formatting
Bold
Italic
Underline

Insert Image
Wrap [QUOTE] tags around selected text
 
Decrease Size
Increase Size
Please sign up or log in to join the discussion

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search



Share Tweet