Quote:
Originally Posted by Tusky
While I agree with the thrust of your argument, they are bad examples. Aquilani was hardly cheap, he cost around £18m and Dossena was decently priced for a full back too at £8m.
|
I agree overall that both Aquilani & Dossena were poor buys.
However it's important to remember there was mitigating factors as to why it was preferential for us to deal with Roma & be interested in Aquilani (some Riise fee outstanding from Roma and a player who due to his history of injury there could be a massively structured deal for). It's not like we had £18m sitting in the bank for a player of our choice unfortunately.
Rafa's biggest problem with Aquilani imo was not so much buying, but not playing him more often when he was fit, especially considering he was nearly always very impressive when he did turn out for us.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Tusky
I'm all for the Rafa love in and wish he had have been properly backed after the brilliant 08 season instead of having to fight off field battles and sell to buy. BUT, his choice of signings in the last two years at the club were down right awful, and were part of the reason for the teams downfall.
|
Last season:
Maxi - good signing.
The Greek - decent signing.
Johnson - good signing.
Aquilani - poor signing.
Voronin - poor signing.
Second last season:
Degen - poor signing.
Riera - decent signing.
Dossena - poor signing.
Keane - poor signing.
Mascherano - good signing.
David Ngog - good signing.
I always maintain that a 50% hit rate is good for any manager.
Rafa continuously got more right in his transfer dealings than he did wrong. When you take into account the financial restrictions (5 of the last 11 players he signed were for between £1.3m & free, at a time when we were the top rated club in Europe).
Taking into account that & the frankly insane pressures he was working under at a boardroom level, I think his overall transfer record during his time at Liverpool was very good.
While his record got worse as the boardroom & financial restrictions intensified (hardly surprising), I would think saying it was "downright awful" is very very harsh and quite frankly, totally untrue.