|
Advertisement
|
|
|
| 04-06-2012, 18:29 | #47 |
|
Registered User
![]() |
Got offered the Cisco epc3925 as a free upgrade and stupidly said yes. The range is rubbish and I only upgraded in the hope of a better signal/aerial than the 2425. Lost wifi in several rooms with new yoke:mad
Was all set to demand my old modem back but I thought I'd try an Old range expander that wouldn't work with the 2425. Works great now and have signal in rooms that were always out of range ![]() Lucky that I had a linksys Wre54g knocking around otherwise worst upgrade ever. |
|
|
| 10-06-2012, 10:11 | #50 |
|
Registered User
![]() |
Would you mind telling how as it seems - according to other posts - that the 3925 does NOT allow for bridging ??
|
|
|
|
Advertisement
|
|
|
| 10-06-2012, 10:49 | #52 |
|
Registered User
![]() |
Sorry, but I am afraid that this is not as simple as that as you will have a dual router setup this way with all the issues of that config (e.g. separate IP segments needed; NAT/port forwarding etc.) - which is why the bridging function is imperative .... Hence my question ....
|
|
|
| 10-06-2012, 16:34 | #53 |
|
Registered User
![]() |
Actually it is totally possible.
Let the Cisco router handle dhcp and disable wireless on it. Change the ip address of the second router to something on the range the Cisco is on. Disable dhcp on the second router Using a cat5 x over cable connect up LAN port 1 to LAN port 1 on the second router. Set up the second router to broadcast wireless. Then the Cisco is doing all your routIng and the second is only acting as a wireless hub. Trust me... It works |
|
|
| Thanks from: |
| 11-06-2012, 09:59 | #54 | |
|
Registered User
![]() |
Quote:
What you are describing here is using your own wireless router as a wireless access-point ..... and sure this works if all you want to ot use the wireless capability of your own wireless router. BUT the real question is to bypass the Cisco's routing function completely and use your own router's routing capablities (as well as wireless obviously) ..... Cheers, Stone |
|
|
|
| Thanks from: |
|
Advertisement
|
|
|
| 11-06-2012, 10:10 | #56 | |
|
Registered User
![]() |
Quote:
there's no significant benefit to bypassing the ciscos routing functionality so the solution i offered will do what he wants to do, extend the wireless signal. Last edited by matt-dublin; 11-06-2012 at 10:23. |
|
|
|
| 11-06-2012, 10:18 | #57 |
|
Registered User
![]() |
according to what i've read online, the 3925 has a DMZ option the same as the thompson router before it, so you can just do what all us thompson owners did and disable everything on the UPC router and connect your own routers WAN port to it and stick it in the DMZ and let it look after everything.
it's not quite bridging, but it's functionally the same for port forwarding and that kind of thing and plenty of people here are using it successfully. |
|
|
| (2) thanks from: |
| 11-06-2012, 12:03 | #58 |
|
Registered User
![]() |
I got the free router upgrade from EPC 2425 to the EPC 3925 and have found the wireless strength terrible. As others have mentioned, it's now very hard to pick up the wifi in rooms where it previously worked fine. I specifically asked the UPC lad on the phone whether the new router would have worse signal too and he said it would be the exact same
![]() Anyway, I was wondering if there is anything on this attached image below that should be changed, because I remember when I first got the EPC 2425 there were a couple of options that people recommended should be ticked. Thanks
|
|
|
| 17-06-2012, 14:06 | #59 |
|
Registered User
|
Anyone else getting the old "limited access" status on wireless connections with this router. It was stable for a few weeks but we are getting this all the time now in different locations in the house and different machines. Its a royal pain at this stage
|
|
|