Boards.ie uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more x
View Poll Results: Will you pay the household charge?
Yes 697 24.52%
No 1,235 43.46%
Dont know 309 10.87%
Not Applicable to me 601 21.15%
Voters: 2842. You may not vote on this poll

Thread Closed  
 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
07-02-2012, 11:14   #2476
Frank Black
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 3,160
Quote:
Originally Posted by gerryo777 View Post
By the time the IMF/ECB are out of this country, all these unsecured bonds will have been paid off so it'll be a bit late then.
As I've said before, taxing people too much only stops them from spending in the domestic economy.
Reduced spending in the domestic economy = little or no job creation.
No job creation = reduced income taxes, reduced spending etc etc and a continuing welfare bill.
BTW black francis, how come when anyone has a view different from yours it's "populist bulls**t"?
Yeah, paid with money we've borrowed.

How do you think we can re-negotiate the terms of repayments if we're depending on the same lenders to fund our day to day spending.

Do you not think we'd be in a better position to re-negoitiate a write off of a significant portion of this money if we were self-sufficient?

And I sasnd by my comment that most of the anti-tax brigade refuse to engage on the substantive question on how we bridge this gap and would rather trade in cheap sloganeering.
Frank Black is offline  
Advertisement
07-02-2012, 11:23   #2477
gerryo777
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 2,187
Quote:
Originally Posted by black francis View Post
Yeah, paid with money we've borrowed.

How do you think we can re-negotiate the terms of repayments if we're depending on the same lenders to fund our day to day spending.

Do you not think we'd be in a better position to re-negoitiate a write off of a significant portion of this money if we were self-sufficient?

And I sasnd by my comment that most of the anti-tax brigade refuse to engage on the substantive question on how we bridge this gap and would rather trade in cheap sloganeering.
How to bridge the gap.
Improve our domestic economy, encourage people with larger than normal savings to spend thus creating jobs, reducing the unemployment numbers and increasing tax take. NO?
gerryo777 is offline  
07-02-2012, 11:28   #2478
mickydoomsux
Registered User
 
mickydoomsux's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,239
Quote:
Originally Posted by gerryo777 View Post
How to bridge the gap.
Improve our domestic economy, encourage people with larger than normal savings to spend thus creating jobs, reducing the unemployment numbers and increasing tax take. NO?
Improve it how? All the anti-campaigns are very light on their own workable alternatives.

You basically just said "We need to make thing more gooder!"

Also, you just described the building boom that ****ed the country in the first place.
mickydoomsux is offline  
07-02-2012, 11:30   #2479
Frank Black
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 3,160
Quote:
Originally Posted by gerryo777 View Post
How to bridge the gap.
Improve our domestic economy, encourage people with larger than normal savings to spend thus creating jobs, reducing the unemployment numbers and increasing tax take. NO?

Quite a gamble you're prepared to take with the public finances - borrow a load more money to try to stimulate demand?

I'd prefer to see us tackle waste in the delivery of public services and broaden our tax base to non-cyclical tax streams.
Frank Black is offline  
07-02-2012, 11:44   #2480
donalg1
Closed Account
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 3,461
Quote:
Originally Posted by gerryo777 View Post
If the local shop goes out of business it's not going to be paying commercial rates which apparently go to funding local services.
Well maybe if they can raise money for local services through the household charge and ultimately property tax then commercial rates can be reduced which will help with job creation.
donalg1 is offline  
Advertisement
07-02-2012, 11:47   #2481
mikom
Registered User
 
mikom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: FRAPING in a parallel universe....
Posts: 12,198
Quote:
Originally Posted by donalg1 View Post
Well maybe if they can raise money for local services through the household charge and ultimately property tax then commercial rates can be reduced which will help with job creation.
Fairy land.

mikom is offline  
07-02-2012, 11:55   #2482
gerryo777
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 2,187
Quote:
Originally Posted by black francis View Post
Quite a gamble you're prepared to take with the public finances - borrow a load more money to try to stimulate demand?

I'd prefer to see us tackle waste in the delivery of public services and broaden our tax base to non-cyclical tax streams.
Or we could just try and tax our way out of this recession. Good luck with that!
gerryo777 is offline  
Thanks from:
07-02-2012, 11:56   #2483
gerryo777
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 2,187
Quote:
Originally Posted by mickydoomsux View Post
Improve it how? All the anti-campaigns are very light on their own workable alternatives.

You basically just said "We need to make thing more gooder!"

Also, you just described the building boom that ****ed the country in the first place.
Fool.
gerryo777 is offline  
Thanks from:
07-02-2012, 11:59   #2484
donalg1
Closed Account
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 3,461
Quote:
Originally Posted by mikom View Post
Fairy land.

Well I am only responding to sills suggestions by the anti campaigners that by not paying the charge everyone will spend loads of money in their local economy and this will create huge amounts of jobs for everyone and then we will all live happily ever after!!
donalg1 is offline  
Advertisement
07-02-2012, 12:13   #2485
donalg1
Closed Account
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 3,461
Quote:
Originally Posted by gerryo777 View Post
Fool.
Thats a Banning!!!
donalg1 is offline  
07-02-2012, 13:59   #2486
Ghandee
Closed Account
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 6,493
Quote:
Originally Posted by black francis View Post
Yeah, paid with money we've borrowed.

How do you think we can re-negotiate the terms of repayments if we're depending on the same lenders to fund our day to day spending.

Do you not think we'd be in a better position to re-negoitiate a write off of a significant portion of this money if we were self-sufficient?

And I sasnd by my comment that most of the anti-tax brigade refuse to engage on the substantive question on how we bridge this gap and would rather trade in cheap sloganeering.
Not me, I didnt borrow it, why should the life be taxed out of me to repay it
Ghandee is offline  
(2) thanks from:
07-02-2012, 14:14   #2487
mickydoomsux
Registered User
 
mickydoomsux's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,239
Quote:
Originally Posted by gerryo777 View Post
Fool.
Great alternative, you've fixed the economy.

More personal attacks by the anti brigade because they haven't got a clue.
mickydoomsux is offline  
Thanks from:
07-02-2012, 14:38   #2488
Frank Black
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 3,160
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ghandee View Post
Not me, I didnt borrow it, why should the life be taxed out of me to repay it
Yeah, just go on ignoring the €18billion hole in our own finances.
Frank Black is offline  
07-02-2012, 14:40   #2489
gerryo777
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 2,187
Quote:
Originally Posted by donalg1 View Post
Thats a Banning!!!
Well you know what they say about a fool and his money!

Sorry mods, but I've been asked for suggestions on how we can improve our situation and I've given what I think are reasonable responses.
donalg1,mickydoomsux and blackfrancis must have an agenda as anyone who doesn't agree with them is accused of trading in 'cheap sloganeering',spouting 'populist bulls**t' (a contradiction in terms there I do believe) and probably gets reported to a moderator for not agreeing with them.
gerryo777 is offline  
07-02-2012, 17:19   #2490
gerryo777
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 2,187
Quote:
Originally Posted by mickydoomsux View Post
Improve it how? All the anti-campaigns are very light on their own workable alternatives.

You basically just said "We need to make thing more gooder!"

Also, you just described the building boom that ****ed the country in the first place.
Do you just read the first line of a post before you jump in?
gerryo777 is offline  
Thread Closed

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search