Boards.ie uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more x
Post Reply  
 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
12-01-2012, 12:30   #76
Plates
Registered User
 
Plates's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 337
Without non turf wickets - there will be a limit to the number of new players and new clubs playing cricket in Ireland. Non turf wickets are realistically the only way a new club can get off the ground. By your logic - all new entrants to cricket in Leinster will have a limit imposed on how far they can be promoted - regardless of the quality of their teams, players, ground, facilities, youth set up etc.

Hardly seems fair - does it?
Plates is offline  
Advertisement
12-01-2012, 12:47   #77
D3PO
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 4,698
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cots View Post
A pitch cannot be re-used more than once in a div 1 or 2 season so your point of cracks over a number of games is still off the mark

Thats just not accurate at all. Last season out in North County they played a game on a saturday and then a monday on the same track
D3PO is offline  
12-01-2012, 12:49   #78
D3PO
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 4,698
Quote:
Originally Posted by Plates View Post
Care to enlighten us on which wickets in Leinster senior cricket you deem to be "proper wickets"? All the turf ones - regardless of quality?

i asked you the opposite of wht wickets you deem to be below a decent standard and you have refused to answer. you ahve a bit of a cheek to ask the opposite if your not prepared to answer yourself.
D3PO is offline  
12-01-2012, 14:16   #79
djimi
Registered User
 
djimi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 6,802
Quote:
Originally Posted by Plates View Post
Without non turf wickets - there will be a limit to the number of new players and new clubs playing cricket in Ireland. Non turf wickets are realistically the only way a new club can get off the ground. By your logic - all new entrants to cricket in Leinster will have a limit imposed on how far they can be promoted - regardless of the quality of their teams, players, ground, facilities, youth set up etc.

Hardly seems fair - does it?
Realistically Im talking about Division 1 and 2 not using mats at all when possible. How many new teams and players do you know that go straight into the top divisions?

Of course new teams may have to use mats, but I would like to think that when a new team starts and develops a ground it is with a view to developing a square capable of turf wickets at some point in the future, especially if they have serious ambitions of getting into the top divisions.
djimi is offline  
12-01-2012, 17:33   #80
Cots
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 34
Quote:
Originally Posted by D3PO View Post
Thats just not accurate at all. Last season out in North County they played a game on a saturday and then a monday on the same track
Of course it's accurate I said cannot be REused more than once, ie. used more than twice, if they did I'm sure it was well tended to but fair play to them for trying a bit of variety on the track
Cots is offline  
Advertisement
13-01-2012, 02:03   #81
Gordon Gecko
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Dublin
Posts: 585
Quote:
Originally Posted by Plates View Post
Fixation isn't quite the right word. I am however a strong believer that artificial wickets of a high quality enable a high quality of cricket to be played on them and play a significant role in player development at all levels - and will be essential if cricket is to grow both in number and reach in Ireland.

I've yet to see a cricketing based argument against the use of good quality artificial wickets.

I've no more fixation on artificials than a number of people on here seem to have with turf.
But you consider Sandyford (which is an out and out brutal mat) to be good quality?
Gordon Gecko is offline  
13-01-2012, 07:33   #82
Plates
Registered User
 
Plates's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 337
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gordon Gecko View Post
But you consider Sandyford (which is an out and out brutal mat) to be good quality?
I've never played on the mat in Sandyford.
Plates is offline  
13-01-2012, 18:40   #83
Bobo148
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 90
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cots View Post
Of course it's accurate I said cannot be REused more than once, ie. used more than twice, if they did I'm sure it was well tended to but fair play to them for trying a bit of variety on the track
No, it's still inaccurate and a gross misrepresentation of the facts. There is no limit to the number of times that a pitch can be used in Leinster cricket.

Sure ask Plates, he'll be able to tell you that there are no regulations on the standards of turf pitches that need to be used. He bangs on about it enough.

Last edited by Bobo148; 13-01-2012 at 18:41. Reason: To protect the not so innocent
Bobo148 is offline  
13-01-2012, 19:56   #84
Cots
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 34
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gordon Gecko View Post
But you consider Sandyford (which is an out and out brutal mat) to be good quality?
I said the Sandyford mat was good for spinners and offered them the same help as a newly prepared grass wicket, I still said it was massivley uneven in bounce and gave one of many ridiculous examples of such
Cots is offline  
Advertisement
13-01-2012, 20:17   #85
Cots
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 34
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bobo148 View Post
No, it's still inaccurate and a gross misrepresentation of the facts. There is no limit to the number of times that a pitch can be used in Leinster cricket.

Sure ask Plates, he'll be able to tell you that there are no regulations on the standards of turf pitches that need to be used. He bangs on about it enough.
I'll be honest with you Bobo, I'll believe that when I see a team using the same wicket 5 and 6 times in the season, why else would teams have such big squares when it would obviously be cheaper to just have 3 or 4 wickets and keep re-using them, the other reason I'm sure there's a regulation around somewhere is wasnt the Phoenix-Tarf game in Tarf called off due to an unplayable pitch on it's second time being used?
Cots is offline  
15-01-2012, 18:17   #86
Bobo148
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 90
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cots View Post
I'll be honest with you Bobo, I'll believe that when I see a team using the same wicket 5 and 6 times in the season, why else would teams have such big squares when it would obviously be cheaper to just have 3 or 4 wickets and keep re-using them, the other reason I'm sure there's a regulation around somewhere is wasnt the Phoenix-Tarf game in Tarf called off due to an unplayable pitch on it's second time being used?
The thing is that they do, just not all at the same level. Most good groundsmen will use a pitch several times over the course of a season, starting at 1st XI level and often working its way down. It really depends on the number and timing of matches. Have you any experience of grounds with turf pitches? I suspect not.

I don't know what the story was with the match in Clontarf but surely the club would have been punished if a reg existed?
Bobo148 is offline  
15-01-2012, 20:10   #87
Cots
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 34
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bobo148 View Post
The thing is that they do, just not all at the same level. Most good groundsmen will use a pitch several times over the course of a season, starting at 1st XI level and often working its way down. It really depends on the number and timing of matches. Have you any experience of grounds with turf pitches? I suspect not.

I don't know what the story was with the match in Clontarf but surely the club would have been punished if a reg existed?
There's no regulation limiting it from being used under senior level, I never said there was.. What I'm saying is I'm fairly sure the reg exists to say there cant be more than 2 senior games on the one wicket, not any other level just senior. Doesnt matter how it's used after that
Cots is offline  
15-01-2012, 20:27   #88
TrueDub
Moderator
 
TrueDub's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Depends on which over it is...
Posts: 1,473
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cots View Post
There's no regulation limiting it from being used under senior level, I never said there was.. What I'm saying is I'm fairly sure the reg exists to say there cant be more than 2 senior games on the one wicket, not any other level just senior. Doesnt matter how it's used after that
Unless the regs changed a lot in the last season, such a regulation does not exist. The LCU regs are on their website, so you could check if you wished.
TrueDub is offline  
16-01-2012, 23:22   #89
Bobo148
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 90
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cots View Post
There's no regulation limiting it from being used under senior level, I never said there was.. What I'm saying is I'm fairly sure the reg exists to say there cant be more than 2 senior games on the one wicket, not any other level just senior. Doesnt matter how it's used after that
Your knowledge of the regs is limited.
Bobo148 is offline  
17-01-2012, 17:02   #90
Cots
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 34
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bobo148 View Post
Your knowledge of the regs is limited.
Sorry mate know this might be a bit off topic but are you the 'tarf Bobo?
Cots is offline  
Post Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Remove Text Formatting
Bold
Italic
Underline

Insert Image
Wrap [QUOTE] tags around selected text
 
Decrease Size
Increase Size
Please sign up or log in to join the discussion

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search