It is not known if its a new species, due to its being a juvenile- it was probably about one year old when it died. It was only 72 cms long, and lived 135 million years ago.
Behold!!

http://www.newscientist.com/blogs/sh...d-be-most.html
| 13-10-2011, 20:35 | #1 |
|
Moderator
![]() |
Incredibly well preserved theropod found in Germany!
It is said to be 98% complete, its articulated, and has bits of fossilized skin!!
It is not known if its a new species, due to its being a juvenile- it was probably about one year old when it died. It was only 72 cms long, and lived 135 million years ago. Behold!! ![]() http://www.newscientist.com/blogs/sh...d-be-most.html |
|
|
|
Advertisement
|
|
|
| 14-10-2011, 19:24 | #2 |
|
Moderator
![]() |
No comments to this still? Wow...
In case anyone cares, I asked Darren Naish what kind of dino he thinks this is- he confirmed what I thought, that its most likely a compsognathid or at least close to them. |
|
|
| 15-10-2011, 12:38 | #3 |
|
Registered User
![]() |
Not sure what comment to make to be honest Adam. It is a nice spot by yourself and it is is in remarkable condition. But I know next to nothing about these things so dunno what else to say I am afraid.
|
|
|
| 15-10-2011, 22:01 | #4 |
|
Moderator
![]() |
Haha its not like u have to say anything... I was simply expecting more excited reactions, after all this is probably the best preserved dinosaur found in a long time...
|
|
|
|
Advertisement
|
|
|
| 16-10-2011, 01:43 | #6 |
|
Moderator
![]() |
Marvelous specimen!
*twiddles mustache* (would have commented / added thread tags sooner, but I've been busy) |
|
|
| 03-07-2012, 00:09 | #9 |
|
Moderator
![]() |
Sciurumimus!!
The little guy (28 inches long) is back in the headlines, and has a name already: Sciurumimus albersdoerferi, the genus name meaning "squirrel mimic".
This may be a small specimen but it has HUGE implications. It seems to be a baby megalosaur, but it shows traces of long fur-like feathers on its body and tail (the tail being fluffy enough to give it its name), thus confirming that theropods other than coelurosaurs were feathered at least during a stage of their lives, and that we can expect more feather evidence from any group of theropods now. |
|
|
|
Advertisement
|
|
|
| 03-07-2012, 00:41 | #10 |
|
Moderator
![]() |
That's fantastic news Adam (and a great name too I might ad!). I think it may be quicker to list all the types of dinosaurs that did not have feathers at this stage.
|
|
|
| 04-07-2012, 13:39 | #11 | |
|
Moderator
![]() |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
| 04-07-2012, 13:55 | #12 |
|
Moderator
![]() |
Hmmm, still can't imagine sauropods with feathers at any stage in life.
Prove me wring science, prove me wrong.... |
|
|
| 04-07-2012, 13:58 | #13 |
|
Moderator
![]() |
|
|
|
| 04-07-2012, 21:34 | #14 |
|
Registered User
![]() |
Big feathered dinosaurs still seem a bit odd to me, but I won't argue the facts as I am sure most folks know a bit more than me.
I found this link, although I think it has been put up before (Probably by Adam.) http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/20...-china-big-fly |
|
|
| 04-07-2012, 22:23 | #15 |
|
Moderator
![]() |
Oh yes, there was a thread about him here.
|
|
|
| Thanks from: |