Boards.ie uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more x
Post Reply  
 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
06-11-2010, 13:15   #1
grames_bond
Registered User
 
grames_bond's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: wouldn't you like to know!!
Posts: 13,556
Bond 23 - "Skyfall" *spoilers from post 595*

Source

Quote:
Now that the MGM film studio is out of financial limbo, the new 007 film, Bond 23, is expected to get a greenlight after delays have suspended production for months. It is now scheduled for release November 2012. In fact, it was announced that the studio would like to plan on a new James Bond movie every two years, according to The Financial Times, if EON Productions, which controls the development of James Bond films, will make arrangements.

Daniel Craig is expected to return as Bond. However, he is currently shooting the American remake of The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo with director David Fincher, and that and other possible scheduling conflicts have caused speculation about whether or not he can return.

In 2011 Craig will star in Jon Favreau's Cowboys & Aliens and Jim Sheridan's Dream House with Naomi Watts, and he lends his voice to Steven Spielberg's The Adventures of Tintin, due for release in December next year.

Sam Mendes (Revolutionary Road, Away We Go) has been in discussions as the director.

Meanwhile, a new Bond novel will be published in May next year, written by the author of The Bone Collector, Jeffery Deaver. The story's working title, Project X, reframes the series with a young Bond as an Afghan War veteran and "a very dark, edgy character."
Not the most reliable of sources but any sign of a new bond is good news in my book!!

Last edited by johnny_ultimate; 02-11-2012 at 11:59.
grames_bond is offline  
Advertisement
06-11-2010, 13:17   #2
MrStuffins
Registered User
 
MrStuffins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 13,304
The new Bond's have been incredible. I'm not so sure about Sam Mendes? Simply because of his directorial history... it's not very New-Bond.

But the biggest disaster would be if Craig was to leave. I love him in the role (and in pretty much everything).
MrStuffins is offline  
Thanks from:
06-11-2010, 13:38   #3
L'prof
Registered User
 
L'prof's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Galway
Posts: 8,791
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrStuffins View Post
The new Bond's have been incredible. I'm not so sure about Sam Mendes? Simply because of his directorial history... it's not very New-Bond.

But the biggest disaster would be if Craig was to leave. I love him in the role (and in pretty much everything).
I have to say I really enjoyed Casino Royal, but Quantum of Solace was fairly pants. Hopefully this one will improve again.
L'prof is offline  
06-11-2010, 13:46   #4
mike65
Registered User
 
mike65's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: waterford
Posts: 80,969
Since Bond became a cash cow its been Aon/UA-MGM policy to try to make a Bond film every two years. They usually managed it. Sam Mendes is interesting, will we see Daniel Craig lying on a bed imagining Miss Moneypenny covered in petals in the pre-credit sequence?
mike65 is offline  
(2) thanks from:
06-11-2010, 17:07   #5
TonyD79
Registered User
 
TonyD79's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,026
Can see the third film being crap and them getting in Nolan in to direct with Hardy as bond!!!..Freeman/Caine as Q?!!!
TonyD79 is offline  
Advertisement
06-11-2010, 17:19   #6
MrStuffins
Registered User
 
MrStuffins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 13,304
Quote:
Originally Posted by L'prof View Post
I have to say I really enjoyed Casino Royal, but Quantum of Solace was fairly pants. Hopefully this one will improve again.
A lot of people thought this but before i went to see it, someone had told me that is was less plot driven and more action driven than Casino Royale... so i just sat back and watched.

Really enjoyed it!
MrStuffins is offline  
06-11-2010, 19:24   #7
Mr. K
Registered User
 
Mr. K's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: New York City
Posts: 2,438
Craig said he'd like to finish out the Quantum plotline, so hopefully he'll be back.
Mr. K is offline  
06-11-2010, 19:46   #8
Richard Dower
Registered User
 
Richard Dower's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Limerick
Posts: 19,633
Send a message via ICQ to Richard Dower
Matt Bomber for Bond!!!!!!!!!!!
Richard Dower is offline  
06-11-2010, 21:02   #9
Goldstein
Registered User
 
Goldstein's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 897
Looking back now, Casino Royale wasn't that bad really, given the pretty awful Quantum of SOlace that followed. It was still very disjointed with no logical flow but Quantum of SOlace viewed like a stream of deleted scenes.

Oh noes, Bond's nemesis is going to control the majority of the water in Bolivia unless someone does something?
Who fúcking cares? Worst Bond bad guy ever!

For the record I think Craig was a great choice to portray Bond, it's not his fault the movies were below par given their resources.
Goldstein is offline  
Thanks from:
Advertisement
07-11-2010, 01:33   #10
fluke
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 790
Some time has passed by and I'm still undecided on where I stand with Quantum of Solace. It's still better than a lot of Bond Films before it but I dunno if I like it. It's like the Batman Returns of Bond movies. I still think it would benefit from seeing where this whole Quantum story is going.
fluke is offline  
07-11-2010, 01:36   #11
crash davis
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 122
Quote:
Originally Posted by TonyD79 View Post
Can see the third film being crap and them getting in Nolan in to direct with Hardy as bond!!!..Freeman/Caine as Q?!!!
Yep, defo with you on this one. Hardy would make a fantastic Bond and they need someone like Nolan to really chart a new and unique course for the franchise seeing as the last one was a poor imitation of the Bourne flicks.
crash davis is offline  
07-11-2010, 01:43   #12
fluke
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 790
I'm a huge Nolan fan but I do think its a bit much to be calling for Nolan to fix this franchise aswell
fluke is offline  
07-11-2010, 01:44   #13
crash davis
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 122
Quote:
Originally Posted by fluke View Post
I'm a huge Nolan fan but I do think its a bit much to be calling for Nolan to fix this franchise aswell
Spielberg has said he always wanted to do a Bond flick. He might be passed it now but still, could generate a huge amount of publicity for it plus he's still capable of telling an action story.
crash davis is offline  
07-11-2010, 01:50   #14
fluke
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 790
I wouldn't mind seeing Spielberg doing one. actually I think Neil Marshall might be the man for the job.
fluke is offline  
07-11-2010, 01:55   #15
crash davis
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 122
He can handle suspense and action, that's for sure, but what about a huge budget like a Bond flick? His last few films have been a bit dodgy too but yeah, it needs something different... badly.
crash davis is offline  
Post Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Remove Text Formatting
Bold
Italic
Underline

Insert Image
Wrap [QUOTE] tags around selected text
 
Decrease Size
Increase Size
Please sign up or log in to join the discussion

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search