Quote:
|
Now who's the clown who said that the radiation leaking from this debacle is less than a fücking cat-scan? Water around Fukushima is now 1800 times above a safe level. Can't wait to eat some of that sushi.
|
| 27-03-2011, 05:15 | #4351 |
|
Registered User
![]() Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 34,453
|
|
|
|
| Thanks from: |
|
Advertisement
|
|
|
| 27-03-2011, 05:20 | #4353 |
|
Registered User
![]() Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 34,453
|
Well thats not good..
How recent is that? We've seen levels spike and recede before, and temporary evacuations. Whats the normal level though 10 million times X is still Y = an unknown variable.
|
|
|
| 27-03-2011, 05:23 | #4355 |
|
Registered User
![]() Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 34,453
|
Maybe?
if it leaks out and steams up it would carry uranium and caesium out. |
|
|
|
Advertisement
|
|
|
| 27-03-2011, 05:26 | #4356 |
|
Moderator
![]() |
|
|
|
| 27-03-2011, 05:27 | #4357 | |
|
Registered User
![]() |
no idea what normal levels are just following this as it breaks on twitter
Quote:
|
|
|
|
| 27-03-2011, 07:02 | #4358 |
|
Banned
|
If radiation remains extremely high they can't very well abandon the plant indefinitely, why don't they just do as the Russians did
and burry the damn thing asap. Last edited by Run_to_da_hills; 27-03-2011 at 07:11. |
|
|
| Thanks from: |
| 27-03-2011, 10:41 | #4359 |
|
Closed Account
|
Wasn't Reactor No2 the one they thought the suppression chamber had cracked after and explosion?
How many Reactors are leaking coolant? If I am getting the reports right ~ not easy with so much going one and news conferences being denied later in the day and so fourth, but it seems like two reactors are leaking. No2 & No3. It had been said that as the water contained iodine, and the spent fuel would not contain isodine, that the water had to be from the cores [somehow]. All I'm getting on the usual news is the clean up of the tsunami and the low microsievert reports. Upstream seems to be gone, live news seems to be gone. ?? Last edited by gbee; 27-03-2011 at 10:46. |
|
|
|
Advertisement
|
|
|
| 27-03-2011, 12:04 | #4360 |
|
Closed Account
|
8:00PM local Japan: 10,000,000 times the normal level found inside nuclear reactors:
Water samples: 1000mSv or 2.9 Billion Bq in turbine building No2 reactor and read above the limit of the gauge. Iodine 134 & 131 Caesium 134 [found in water] High levels of radiation including iodine [2 types] but the reactor is off for a 1/2 month now. No2 reactor suppression chamber may be damaged. Current data does not indicate that the current substances are leaking from the reactor. They cannot deny that the leak is indicating damage in the suppression chamber but have no data. ME: if I read this correctly, it seems the reactor No2 is actually still active? Right 134mCs (with a half-life of just under 3 hours), ? 4 to 5 hours in here at these levels are lethal. Last edited by gbee; 27-03-2011 at 12:32. |
|
|
| 27-03-2011, 13:05 | #4361 | |
|
Registered User
![]() |
Quote:
Interesting article.. thanks. |
|
|
|
| 27-03-2011, 13:05 | #4362 | |
|
Registered User
![]() |
Quote:
The radioactive reading may actually be higher than 10,000,000 times the normal level , because they say it exceeded the range of the counter. The levels are such that a person can not spend more than 10 or 15 mins close to it, which will severely complicate stabilizing at the reactors. They found Iodine 134, a fission product which has a half-life of 53 minutes. This isotope loses half its radioactive atoms every 53 minutes so it should all be gone in 530 minutes. This means that it was created by uncontrolled and uncontained nuclear fission in the previous few hours, maybe in a severely damaged reactor or in the spent rod pool. This nuclear fission could also possibly generate enough heat to burn its way through steel and concrete. Things seem to be going out of control again.
|
|
|
|
| 27-03-2011, 13:22 | #4363 | |
|
Moderator
![]() |
Quote:
This of course is a massive problem in that all of that highly contaminated water has to be safely disposed of before they can even think about investigating further and getting things fixed. How do you remove cubic meters over cubic meters of highly radioactive water without killing people? |
|
|
|
| 27-03-2011, 17:08 | #4364 | |
|
Registered User
![]() |
looks like someone at TEPCO didn't do their sums right before their last press release.
Quote:
|
|
|
|
| 27-03-2011, 19:49 | #4365 | |
|
Registered User
![]() |
Awesome Rescuer is Awesome!
Quote:
|
|
|
|