Quote:
|
Fair enough. Let's stop shovelling the snow and let them all OD. We could do with less junkies mugging people, something they would continue to do even if heroin was legal.
Also, nice pun. ![]() |
| 18-08-2010, 20:15 | #16 |
|
Registered User
![]() |
|
|
|
|
Advertisement
|
|
|
| 18-08-2010, 20:44 | #17 | |
|
Registered User
![]() |
Quote:
Customs officials, police of all ranks, government ministers, health officials, prison authorities...many of these roles would be decimated by any mass movement toward regulation and legalisation of drugs en masse which is one of the primary reasons it'll never happen. Terry, the reason those meds cost you and your mates so much is down to a few factors, not least of which is that the meds are probably still under patent from the pharmaceutical company, who can charge a premium to pay for all their R&D, marketing, bribing GPs etc, then the supplier and the chemist shop have to make their cut and of course this being Ireland a paddy tax whacked on top for good measure. Comparing 'scrip meds to recreational drugs (particualrly when they're still illegal) is apples and oranges...the primary cost factor in any illegal drug is it's illegality. The supply chain is restricted to the criminal fraternity who set the prce....all along the supply chain little profits are made, which goes on to add up to the huge mark ups from poppy field to shooting gallery. Ideally (and it'll never happen) western governments (with UN backing) would buy heroin (or any other drug) at source, paying going market rates to farmers, cut out ALL the middlemen, be they gun toting howyas from the local estate, or US backed puppet warlords, or the myriad of other people along that chain, all who contribute to the "street price". Then supplying the drug to addicts (under a system similar to where the Canadians or Swiss are now) in a controlled way, at little to no cost (compared to the guge costs currently)....if an addict can get his/her daily fix at 10% of what thye're paying now, an arguably much cleaner supply with less inherent health problems, why on earth would they be out mugging people....the reason so many need to fund their habit through crime is solely don to the price which as I mentioned is mostly due to illegality and monoplies of supply. In a truly ideal system, heroin or cocaine would be treated like any other agricultural commodity and traded on world markets like coffee or cocoa beans, wheat, whatever...taxed and regulated. Listen, as the docu maker himself said, what we have now isn't working and is just making it worse....whatever else is tried can't be any worse than the ssytem developed over the last 40 yrs. Moralistic and political agruments combined with the vested interests that make their own fortunes from the drug war will make sure that legalisation never happens at the levels necessary to change things for the better...it's much better for all involved to go on being criminals and for others to make their living from that, it's much better that the small time dealer in Harlem, the hooker in harrowgate or the guy guarding the opium in Kabul go to jail or get their hands cut off, than being pragmatic and tackling drugs as an issue of personal and societal health rather than through legislative and judicial means, which only furthers the destruction of lives above and beyond what the drugs themselves actually cause... |
|
|
|
| (5) thanks from: |
| 18-08-2010, 21:04 | #18 |
|
Registered User
![]() |
Legalise everything.
I seen the documentary and it proved to me that people will always find legal alternatives. You might as well legalise, regulate, tax, educate and allow people to make up their own minds. We'd also have an opportunity to forge a positive drug culture... Ie people may steer away from hard drugs if everything was legalised and only things like weed and MDMA became popular and 'cool'... Speaking as a non-user here btw. |
|
|
| 19-08-2010, 00:51 | #19 |
|
Registered User
![]() |
It's down to moralistic and political prejudices. People have been indoctrinated into the belief that drugs are morally evil since birth. Trying to shake that belief is almost as difficult as trying to shake off peoples religion. I believe that the legalisation and controlled production and dissemination of drugs is the only effective policy. However I don't believe that the public at large are amenable to such a radical shift in perception.
|
|
|
| 19-08-2010, 11:35 | #20 | |
|
Registered User
![]() |
Quote:
If you continue to jail people for using or supplying drugs, the real criminals (people who kill, injure, steal, rape, embezzle) are less liklely to do proper jail time, and in fact may see no jail due to lack of prison places/resources. Then the fact that most people with a drug conviction can neither emigrate legally or find work with the majority of employers/companies, means that when they get out, they become a burden on the state and their families. That helps no-one, it doesn't stop the supply or the demand...the futility is depressing. I'm also of the opinion that we've let the illegal drug trade get too much of a grip on things over the years. To contradict my other post somewhat, governments deciding to buy raw product at source and cutting out drug mules, bribed officials, dealers and whoever else along the supply chain would face a struggle; a lot of people have an awful lot to lose...I'm thinking particularly of the taliban or central American drug cartels, and some of the more organised street gangs (triads, aryan brotherhood, various mafias)...wrestling control away from these people would be difficult. BTW in my other post I made reference to the people employed by the systems set up to keep illegal drugs in check, the vested interests...I'd like to clarify that I'm not of the opinion that all these stauatory bodies and legal entities were set up as some sort of "jobs for good folk" club in some conspiracy against the evil drug trade...these systems have simply evolved on one side while the drug trade diversified on the other. The two systems are now so entangled that it's going to take a lot of hard work and persuasion to turn things around... |
|
|
|
|
Advertisement
|
|
|
| 19-08-2010, 12:41 | #21 | |
|
Registered User
![]() |
Quote:
Not everyone who takes drugs is a junkie, only a very small percentage are. I don't have any hard and fast figures, but i would guess it's around the same ratio as social drinkers/alcoholics. Some people are just gluttons - be it with drugs, alcohol, food, sex, gambling or anything else. Nobody tells you you can't have a big mac just cos mary harney doesn't know when she's had enough, or you can't have a pint because biffo might not know when to say stop. It's nanny state bulls'hit to keep uneducated peoples eyes off of the real problems. Newsflash - people take drugs because they are ENJOYABLE. If they weren't, people might try them out of curiosity but would hardly keep coming back now would they!! This has been the case for thousands of years and is not going to change anytime soon. It's human nature and it doesn't change to suit politicians or anyone else. |
|
|
|