Quote:
|
<snip>
There's earth moving work going on outside the fence as you exit the M1N |
Regards!
| 12-01-2012, 21:18 | #481 | |
|
Closed Account
|
Quote:
Regards! |
|
|
|
|
Advertisement
|
|
|
| 13-01-2012, 20:07 | #485 | |
|
Closed Account
|
Quote:
Regards! |
|
|
|
| Thanks from: |
|
Advertisement
|
|
|
| 13-01-2012, 20:19 | #486 | |
|
Registered User
![]() |
Quote:
I ask because the Broadmeadow bridge was designed for 3x3.75m lanes and this is the main point of constriction. |
|
|
|
| 13-01-2012, 21:15 | #488 | |
|
Closed Account
|
Quote:
Regards! |
|
|
|
| 13-01-2012, 21:22 | #489 | |
|
Closed Account
|
Quote:
Regards! |
|
|
|
| Thanks from: |
|
Advertisement
|
|
|
| 13-01-2012, 21:31 | #490 | |
|
Registered User
![]() |
Quote:
Traffic mixing with ped/cyclist at a "rural" junction like this, looks dangerous to me. Is it rural enough area that ped/cyclist is extremely low? |
|
|
|
| 15-01-2012, 21:27 | #491 | |
|
Registered User
![]() |
Quote:
I don't think its exceptional to say that there are 1-2 collisions per week these days; sometimes more. 2 this week, 1 the previous week, 3 in a row the last week before christmas fridays collision was in the middle lane, back from the merge a bit - 2 cars in bits, especially the one behind - bonnot was in a big V. Last week there appeared to be 5 cars damaged one of the days. I'm actually getting sick to the teeth of it! the old way was actually better and less stress. I think the problem is AFTER the merge. for some reason the traffic takes hundreds of yards to get going even though the volume isn't near capacity, and the inside lane is the faster one, which makes it even more dangerous as you have lads diving down both the outside AND inside lanes. I think the problem is that slower/careful drivers stay out of the inside lane for the Swords exit, and then end up inadvertently in the overtaking lane after the merge with lads jumping all over them, inside and behind. (did I mention I was sick of it??!) Last edited by sk8board; 15-01-2012 at 21:30. |
|
|
|
| Thanks from: |
| 16-01-2012, 10:11 | #492 |
|
Registered User
![]() |
I'd be surprised if they lowered the limit. The main reason the limit on the M50 is 100 is not due to narrow lanes, it's because of close junction spacing. The distance between Drinan and Lissenhall is 4k.
|
|
|
| 16-01-2012, 15:00 | #494 | |
|
Registered User
![]() |
Quote:
Traffic moves along at 120KPH for 21 hours of the day here at present, without this "improvement". |
|
|
|
| (2) thanks from: |
| 17-01-2012, 08:21 | #495 | |
|
Registered User
![]() |
Quote:
|
|
|
|