Boards.ie uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more x
Post Reply  
 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
06-05-2010, 00:20   #16
ninty9er
Registered User
 
ninty9er's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: In the iCloud
Posts: 8,763
Quote:
Originally Posted by dlofnep View Post
No they are not. Nuns are still wearing the same clothes that they wore 50 years ago. My mother works for Nuns as a receptionist. Lovely old ladies that they are - but there is really hardly any difference between the clothing that they wear and a burqa.

I have interaction with a nun and a preist on a daily basis for work. Neither of them are distinguishable as such. I've seen nuns dressed like that, but it's not common.
ninty9er is offline  
Thanks from:
Advertisement
06-05-2010, 00:31   #17
wes
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Dublin, Ireland
Posts: 6,724
Quote:
Originally Posted by ninty9er View Post
This isn't an easily decided argument, but banning the burqa would preclude anyone from wearing one, not just a Muslim. I know that's strange arguing, but it's a law that will not apply to Muslims only, but will, in the main, affect Muslim women only.
You could argue that a ban on Homosexual activities doesn't discriminate against Gay people, if it was applied to people of all sexual orientations. A similar argument is also offered against Gay marriage, that it doesn't discriminate as a straight person can't marry the same sex. It is of course a bull**** cop out. the law is aimed at Muslims in this instance, and pretend otherwise is a ridiculous cop out, no different than the cop out against Gay marriage.

Quote:
Originally Posted by ninty9er View Post
I'd find it very unnerving not to be able to see someone's face if I'm having an arm's length conversation with them.
Hardly a basis for a ban. If we were to ban things on such a basis, things would just get silly.

Quote:
Originally Posted by ninty9er View Post
People are entitled to their freedoms, but Swiss democracy is one of the most democratic kinds.
Well, clearly a majority of the electorate in Switzerland don't think that way. After-all, no one has the freedom to build an minarets there.

Quote:
Originally Posted by ninty9er View Post
For example, I believe (I may be wrong) it is not allowable in certain countries to have a crucifix in public places, the bruqa has a similar religious significance.
I think the only place, is Saudi Arabia, and I think emulating them in general is a bad idea. Personally, i wouldn't want to keep such company, but it seems many are happy to do so.

Quote:
Originally Posted by ninty9er View Post
This is not xenophobic, if however the Swiss were to decide people were not permitted to be Muslim or practice Islam, then that would be xenophobic.
Its a law about protecting there culture from foreign influences, and all that bollox. So its very much Xenophobic.
wes is offline  
(5) thanks from:
06-05-2010, 00:32   #18
dlofnep
Closed Account
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 20,248
Quote:
Originally Posted by ninty9er View Post
I have interaction with a nun and a preist on a daily basis for work. Neither of them are distinguishable as such. I've seen nuns dressed like that, but it's not common.
I'm not sure about that!

It's moot either way - My point is that, there was never an issue with the way Nuns dressed in the past (which is obviously to cover up). So why should there be one now with Muslims?
dlofnep is offline  
06-05-2010, 00:40   #19
ninty9er
Registered User
 
ninty9er's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: In the iCloud
Posts: 8,763
Quote:
Originally Posted by dlofnep View Post
I'm not sure about that!

It's moot either way - My point is that, there was never an issue with the way Nuns dressed in the past (which is obviously to cover up). So why should there be one now with Muslims?
The Swiss, I believe, are being proactive BEFORE it becomes an issue...many would welcome such politics in most countries.
ninty9er is offline  
06-05-2010, 00:52   #20
dlofnep
Closed Account
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 20,248
Quote:
Originally Posted by ninty9er View Post
The Swiss, I believe, are being proactive BEFORE it becomes an issue...many would welcome such politics in most countries.
Ah yes - The Modh Coinniollach of politics. Banning stuff arbitrarily on the basis of something that might happen.
dlofnep is offline  
Advertisement
06-05-2010, 01:19   #21
AlekSmart
Registered User
 
AlekSmart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Dublin
Posts: 6,570
Quote:
Ah yes - The Modh Coinniollach of politics. Banning stuff arbitrarily on the basis of something that might happen.
Yup...good for the Switzers..probably explains why they ain`t top of the queue for a German/IMF bailout....
AlekSmart is offline  
06-05-2010, 01:49   #22
RayM
Recreational User
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,678
Quote:
Originally Posted by ninty9er View Post
The Swiss, I believe, are being proactive BEFORE it becomes an issue...many would welcome such politics in most countries.
They're not being proactive. They're seeking to take something that is far from being an endemic problem (or even a tiny, trifling iota of a minor issue), and using it as a conduit through which to stick two great big fingers up at their Muslim population. Just like they did with the minarets.
RayM is offline  
06-05-2010, 02:02   #23
Manic Moran
Moderator
 
Manic Moran's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Danville, California
Posts: 10,785
Quote:
Originally Posted by wes View Post
Its a law about protecting there culture from foreign influences, and all that bollox. So its very much Xenophobic.
Out of interest, I note that two predominantly muslim countries, Turkey and Tunisia, also bar wearing burkas in government buildings, schools, and universities. (And, I believe, they even go as far as to ban hijabs, Turkey draws the line at allowing the basortusu, a sort of loose headscarf, in university).

Would you say that these are also for xenophobic reasons?

NTM

Last edited by Manic Moran; 06-05-2010 at 02:04.
Manic Moran is offline  
Thanks from:
06-05-2010, 02:21   #24
nachoman
Registered User
 
nachoman's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 225
I think they look very stylish, very good in the winter I'd say, like a scarf and a hat rolled into one.
nachoman is offline  
Advertisement
06-05-2010, 02:56   #25
Executive Steve
Registered User
 
Executive Steve's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: The Ghetto
Posts: 3,251
Send a message via AIM to Executive Steve Send a message via MSN to Executive Steve
Quote:
Originally Posted by nachoman View Post
I think they look very stylish, very good in the winter I'd say, like a scarf and a hat rolled into one.


You're thinking of the Hajib, which can and does indeed look very stylish and which i personally have no problem with at all, with the Niqaab (which covers the face) and the Burqha (which is literally a cloth with a few pinholes in it)



^ Hijab



^ Niqaab



^ Burqha
There are big differences between the extents of the various bans being proposed in the various countries and I personally feel there are also degrees of difference in acceptability involved as to which I am comfortable with, so please lets all be absolutely clear that we're all referring to the same garment here in case we get our wires crossed

Executive Steve is offline  
06-05-2010, 03:06   #26
Peanut
Registered User
 
Peanut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Celbridge
Posts: 1,346
Quote:
Originally Posted by Manic Moran View Post
Out of interest, I note that two predominantly muslim countries, Turkey and Tunisia, also bar wearing burkas in government buildings, schools, and universities. (And, I believe, they even go as far as to ban hijabs, Turkey draws the line at allowing the basortusu, a sort of loose headscarf, in university).

Would you say that these are also for xenophobic reasons?

NTM
I think in the case of Turkey at least, there was a sort of xenophobic element behind this during the foundation of the state, in terms of Ataturk wanting to reduce what he considered the retrograde Arabic influences in Turkish society at the time.

In present day Turkey the headscarf (hijab) ban is one of the most contentious social issues. Supporters of the ban fear that moves to ease it will give too much power to hard-line Islamists. On a practical level, secularists don't want to encourage a situation where they may be forced by social/peer pressure to adopt the headscarf if a majority in their workplace or university are wearing them.

On the other hand, this leads to fantastically absurd workarounds such as women in certain jobs wearing a wig, over a scarf, which itself is over their hair.


Last edited by Peanut; 06-05-2010 at 03:16.
Peanut is offline  
Thanks from:
06-05-2010, 03:21   #27
Euro_Kraut
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,903
I am generally uncomfortable with the Govt deciding what people can or cannot wear. I find people who wear sunglasses indoors to be very off putting. However I am not sure there should be a ban on that.

I am also wary of the motives of the party that are proposing this ban. They are the SVP and are responsible for these memorable poster among others:







I am not convinced that the first vote on Minert bans was promoted out of respect for Swiss architecture laws and planning regulations. Similarly, I am not convinced that this is motivated out of concern for women liberty and the off chance the the burqua will be used a disguise by criminals. I think the motives are more likely racial rabble rousing for political gain.
Euro_Kraut is offline  
(4) thanks from:
06-05-2010, 07:47   #28
irishconvert
Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,804
Mod: Islam
I was speaking to a Swiss Muslim (a convert) and he told me that since the ban on minerats that Muslims have become more "religious". The mosques are full for all 5 daily prayers now and not just friday prayers. At least something good is coming out of the Swiss' bigotry. Any attacks on Muslims will only make them stronger :-)
irishconvert is offline  
06-05-2010, 09:35   #29
Flamed Diving
Closed Account
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 6,545
Quote:
Originally Posted by irishconvert View Post
I was speaking to a Swiss Muslim (a convert) and he told me that since the ban on minerats that Muslims have become more "religious". The mosques are full for all 5 daily prayers now and not just friday prayers. At least something good is coming out of the Swiss' bigotry. Any attacks on Muslims will only make them stronger :-)
...and more... fundamentally-y...
Flamed Diving is offline  
(2) thanks from:
06-05-2010, 09:42   #30
Nodin
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 23,384
Quote:
Originally Posted by Flamed Diving View Post
...and more... fundamentally-y...
More than likely. Persecuting people for being catholic didn't work here. Trying to force the people to become more secular in Iran made them more religous. Theres a clear pattern that people seem to be willfully ignoring.
Nodin is offline  
Post Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Remove Text Formatting
Bold
Italic
Underline

Insert Image
Wrap [QUOTE] tags around selected text
 
Decrease Size
Increase Size
Please sign up or log in to join the discussion

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search