Metro North - Page 2 - boards.ie
Boards.ie uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more x
Post Reply  
 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
09-03-2010, 20:53   #16
etchyed
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 633
Green Line metro upgrade

I'm a relatively new poster here but a very long time reader. I would advise anyone who's new to this topic to read this:
http://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showp...&postcount=285

The green line is never going to be upgraded to metro.

The above is just one post. There are countless more threads detailing exactly why it'll never happen. Those who posted in them would probably be better placed to find them, as they go back a good few years.

It would be great if someone more knowledgeable than me could explain the whole thing and put the green line metro myth to bed for another few months, until someone forgets again why it can't happen.
etchyed is offline  
(2) thanks from:
Advertisement
09-03-2010, 21:11   #17
BluntGuy
Closed Account
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 2,450
Quote:
Originally Posted by etchyed View Post
I have a question. Is MN completely separated from traffic once it leaves its tunnels? e.g. does it cross any roads, are there pedestrian crossings etc.
It will be almost completely segregated. If memory serves me, it won't actually interact with traffic until north of Estuary, and passenger numbers will be fairly low at that point. It will run near streets certainly, and there will be a few crossings, similar to Luas, but the vast majority of the "Metro"will mostly be segregated from traffic, running on two elevated viaducts (880 m and one 360 m), retained cuttings, underpasses, embankments etc.

I suppose, it will resemble a hybrid of a heavy rail service and a light rail one. But Metro North leans far more towards Heavy Rail, Metro West on the other hand...
BluntGuy is offline  
Thanks from:
09-03-2010, 21:21   #18
etchyed
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 633
Quote:
Originally Posted by BluntGuy View Post
It will be almost completely segregated. If memory serves me, it won't actually interact with traffic until north of Estuary, and passenger numbers will be fairly low at that point. It will run near streets certainly, and there will be a few crossings, similar to Luas, but the vast majority of the "Metro"will mostly be segregated from traffic, running on two elevated viaducts (880 m and one 360 m), retained cuttings, underpasses, embankments etc.

I suppose, it will resemble a hybrid of a heavy rail service and a light rail one. But Metro North leans far more towards Heavy Rail, Metro West on the other hand...
The "hybrid" aspect is what worries me. It seems like a waste of the capacity of a tunnel through the city centre to have trams slowed down by having to cross roads on the outskirts.
etchyed is offline  
09-03-2010, 21:31   #19
BluntGuy
Closed Account
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 2,450
Quote:
Originally Posted by etchyed View Post
The "hybrid" aspect is what worries me. It seems like a waste of the capacity of a tunnel through the city centre to have trams slowed down by having to cross roads on the outskirts.
Well going through the reference plans, there is only one signalised road traffic crossing, and that's very near the terminus. It states that the Metro will have priority.

The majority of pedestrian crossings will be at the stations, so I doubt crossings will have a major detrimental impact on frequencies. There is a turnback facility of sorts provided north of the airport as well, so Airport-City Centre journeys are unlikely to experience delay at any rate.

Last edited by BluntGuy; 09-03-2010 at 21:34. Reason: added links
BluntGuy is offline  
Thanks from:
09-03-2010, 22:37   #20
etchyed
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 633
Quote:
Originally Posted by BluntGuy View Post
Well going through the reference plans, there is only one signalised road traffic crossing, and that's very near the terminus. It states that the Metro will have priority.

The majority of pedestrian crossings will be at the stations, so I doubt crossings will have a major detrimental impact on frequencies. There is a turnback facility of sorts provided north of the airport as well, so Airport-City Centre journeys are unlikely to experience delay at any rate.
Hmmm, fair enough. Thanks for the info.
etchyed is offline  
Advertisement
11-03-2010, 01:12   #21
sdeire
Northsider
 
sdeire's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: North Co. Dublin
Posts: 5,822
Send a message via MSN to sdeire Send a message via Skype™ to sdeire
Quote:
Originally Posted by thebman View Post
Also the Celtic consortium seems strangly foreign
That probably means it'll be done right, in fairness

Irish interest in the consortia is all well and good but I'd prefer if AIB and the other banks kept their, grubby, greedy, moneygrabbing-bastard hands off our public infrastructure.
sdeire is offline  
(4) thanks from:
11-03-2010, 01:33   #22
thebman
Closed Account
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 9,948
Quote:
Originally Posted by sdonn View Post
That probably means it'll be done right, in fairness

Irish interest in the consortia is all well and good but I'd prefer if AIB and the other banks kept their, grubby, greedy, moneygrabbing-bastard hands off our public infrastructure.
Not arguing that, just pointing out the obvious naming issue
thebman is offline  
11-03-2010, 10:48   #23
sdeire
Northsider
 
sdeire's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: North Co. Dublin
Posts: 5,822
Send a message via MSN to sdeire Send a message via Skype™ to sdeire
Quote:
Originally Posted by thebman View Post
Not arguing that, just pointing out the obvious naming issue
Ah yeah, and I'm just ranting. Free speech FTW
sdeire is offline  
12-03-2010, 15:04   #24
Enbee
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 82
Quote:
Originally Posted by etchyed View Post
I'm a relatively new poster here but a very long time reader. I would advise anyone who's new to this topic to read this:
http://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showp...&postcount=285

The green line is never going to be upgraded to metro.
If the metro was going to be extended would it not make more sense to tunnel underneath the green line for an extra stop or two (so Harcourt could be Luas and Metro) and then swing west towards a terminus in somewhere like Rathmines? Perhaps even with a view to eventually extending it all the way to Tallaght?

The only problem, of course, being the population densities beyond the canals.
Enbee is offline  
Advertisement
15-03-2010, 11:06   #25
BluntGuy
Closed Account
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 2,450
Quote:
Originally Posted by Enbee View Post
If the metro was going to be extended would it not make more sense to tunnel underneath the green line for an extra stop or two (so Harcourt could be Luas and Metro) and then swing west towards a terminus in somewhere like Rathmines? Perhaps even with a view to eventually extending it all the way to Tallaght?

The only problem, of course, being the population densities beyond the canals.
Indeed. It would be nice to have a north-south "Metro" spine, with some services running all the way, some from Airport-St.Stephen's Green and som from St.Stephen's Green-Cherrywood.

Of course, if we'd had proper planning, this would've been done from the start. But alas, an awkward and expensive Green Line upgrade would be needed to make this happen, along with some fairly redundant stops (Harcourt doesn't need Luas and Metro tbh).
BluntGuy is offline  
15-03-2010, 11:23   #26
ilovegermany
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 76
Quote:
Originally Posted by BluntGuy View Post
Indeed. It would be nice to have a north-south "Metro" spine, with some services running all the way, some from Airport-St.Stephen's Green and som from St.Stephen's Green-Cherrywood.

Of course, if we'd had proper planning, this would've been done from the start. But alas, an awkward and expensive Green Line upgrade would be needed to make this happen, along with some fairly redundant stops (Harcourt doesn't need Luas and Metro tbh).
Isn't the Plan to eventually extend the Metro from Stephen's Green with a few new stations and link in with the Luas Green line somewhere around Miltown and then use the existing tracks to Sandyford-Cherrywood-Bray (only a couple of small stretchs of unsegregated track from Miltown to Cherrywood). The existing green line could then be expanded out to other areas (e.g. Rathfarnham) and will run all the way through the city centre to Boombridge and eventually Finglas.
This will provide both a north-south luas and metro.
ilovegermany is offline  
22-03-2010, 13:45   #27
North Cork
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 155
EIB may give €500m to Dublin Metro project

http://www.rte.ie/business/2010/0322/eib.html


The European Investment Bank has agreed in principle to contribute €500m to the Dublin Metro project.
The planned Metro would provide a 19km link from Dublin city centre, via the airport, to Swords in the north of the county.

The EIB said today that it sees the Metro as a key infrastructure project for the country. Its total cost is estimated at around €6 billion.


The funds are subject to full board approval, and a decision of the Government here to go ahead with the scheme.

The bank is also currently considering two other public-private partnership projects in Ireland, which would form part of a second western transport corridor between Cork, Limerick and Galway - the N17-N18 Gort to Tuam motorway link and the N11-N7 motorway.

Meanwhile, the European Investment Bank today reiterated its commitment to Ireland and said it would continue to support projects in the transport, energy and education sectors.

It also said it would reinforce support for small and medium sized businesses in close co-operation with local banks.

Funding of €1.02 billion for Ireland last year
The EIB last year provided €1.02 billion for six projects here - the largest ever amount secured by the country.

Funding for recent energy projects included €300m for the Eirgrid East West Interconnector and €200m for wind farms under the ESB's renewables programme. €300m was also given to Dublin airport for its new terminal.

The EIB also gave a total of €260m to AIB, Bank of Ireland and Ulster Bank for credit for small and medium sized enterprises during the year.
'We are confident that industry, transport, social infrastructure, health and education will continue to benefit from EIB support in coming years,'the bank's vice president Plutarchos Sakellaris said at the start of a visit to Ireland.

Mr Sakellaris met Finance Minister Brian Lenihan, the Governor the Central Bank, Patrick Honohan, Transport Minister Noel Dempsey as well as officials from the Financial Regulatory Authority during his visit to Dublin.
North Cork is offline  
(3) thanks from:
22-03-2010, 18:39   #28
Sponge Bob
Banned
 
Sponge Bob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Location Location
Posts: 24,830
That is excellent news. We need a top rated institution in the overall funding pool and we have none in Ireland any more.

Of course the €6bn figure for Metro North is plain wrong.

I take it they mean that €500m will be fecked into a pot from which MN will be financed ....or else they mean €2bn for MN and €4bn for Interconnector or something along those lines.
Sponge Bob is offline  
22-03-2010, 18:53   #29
BluntGuy
Closed Account
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 2,450
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sponge Bob View Post
That is excellent news. We need a top rated institution in the overall funding pool and we have none in Ireland any more.

Of course the €6bn figure for Metro North is plain wrong.

I take it they mean that €500m will be fecked into a pot from which MN will be financed ....or else they mean €2bn for MN and €4bn for Interconnector or something along those lines.
MN was reputed to cost €5bn at some point, €3 billion has been quoted, €2 billion is the more recent one and even less than €2 billion has been quoted.

I was very reserved in my support for a Metro North costing €5 billion. (For what you get - a high capacity tram line of 19 km in length).

But for between maybe €1.6 billion and €2.3 billion, it begins to look like a much better deal, especially towards the low end of the scale. If the final tender came in below €2 billion, I would be delighted.

Of course, the other big project which has been mooted at about a billion (prob realistically around €1.5 billion) is DART Underground. Now THAT offers value for money that Metro North will never be able to compete with.
BluntGuy is offline  
22-03-2010, 20:37   #30
Sponge Bob
Banned
 
Sponge Bob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Location Location
Posts: 24,830
Quote:
Originally Posted by BluntGuy View Post
MN was reputed to cost €5bn at some point, €3 billion has been quoted, €2 billion is the more recent one and even less than €2 billion has been quoted.
Yeah but as certain loony posters loudly trilled....it is a ppp and will not cost €500m in any given year. So what is the €500m for ???

Quote:
I was very reserved in my support for a Metro North costing €5 billion. (For what you get - a high capacity tram line of 19 km in length).
Bertie would have spent that of course

Quote:
But for between maybe €1.6 billion and €2.3 billion, it begins to look like a much better deal, especially towards the low end of the scale. If the final tender came in below €2 billion, I would be delighted.

Of course, the other big project which has been mooted at about a billion (prob realistically around €1.5 billion) is DART Underground. Now THAT offers value for money that Metro North will never be able to compete with.
Interconnector ( the full project including quad tracks/electrification/rolling stick ) is around €4bn and added to €2bn would be €6bn

If I hear it is for bloody Metro West and Luas to Lucan I will be very cross
Sponge Bob is offline  
Post Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Remove Text Formatting
Bold
Italic
Underline

Insert Image
Wrap [QUOTE] tags around selected text
 
Decrease Size
Increase Size
Please sign up or log in to join the discussion

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search



Share Tweet