15 year old boy who had consensual sex with 14 year old girl faces 5 years in prison - boards.ie
Boards.ie uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more x
Post Reply  
 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
16-12-2009, 19:38   #1
dioltas
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: tty7
Posts: 1,164
15 year old boy who had consensual sex with 14 year old girl faces 5 years in prison

He's challenging the law under which he is charged on the grounds of sexual discrimination. If he loses he faces five years in jail and I assume will be a sex offender.
I think this is ridiculous, and I really hope he wins.

http://www.rte.ie/news/2009/1216/statutory.html

Quote:
Challenge to underage sex law

Wednesday, 16 December 2009 17:26
An 18-year-old charged with having sex with a 14-year-old girl when he was 15 has begun a legal challenge to the legislation under which he is charged.
He is accused of having sex with the girl in August 2006.

The man says that the 2006 legislation that allows him to be prosecuted but states that a girl under 17 is not guilty of an offence is old fashioned gender-based discrimination for which the State has no justification.
Advertisement

He is charged under Section 3 of the Criminal Law Sexual Offences Act of 2006 and faces a maximum of five years in jail if he is convicted.
Under Section 5 of the same act, a girl under 17 cannot be charged with an offence for engaging in sexual activity.
The boy's lawyers told the court the legislation proceeded on the basis that the boy was 'the guilty party' and the girl was a 'comely maiden' whose virtue must be protected.
Senior Counsel Gerard Hogan said that if he was convicted he would face a conviction for a sexual offence with all the ignominy and distress associated with that.
He said he faced the prospect of having his life destroyed.
Mr Hogan said five years in prison and a conviction for a sexual offence for a boy of 15 who engaged in consensual sexual activity was a 'savage penalty'.
Mr Hogan said the State's justification for the provision in the legislation was that an underage girl would be deterred from engaging in sexual activity by the prospect of becoming pregnant.
The Oireachtas had to 'equalise' the positions of a boy and a girl by providing an equal deterrent to a boy in the form of making the sexual activity a criminal offence, he said.
He added that no sane person would encourage a 14 and a 15-year-old to engage in sexual activity but he said this was nakedly gender based legislation.
He said no one would suggest that pregnancy in a young girl was something that could be countenanced but he said there was no comparison between pregnancy and the prosecution for a sexual offence, which would destroy a young life.
The legislation was enacted in the aftermath of the Supreme Court ruling that found that the laws governing statutory rape were unconstitutional because they did not allow for a defence of reasonable mistake about a girl's age.
Mr Hogan said this was not the kind of case that came up after the Supreme Court ruling where for example a 40-year-old man took advantage of a 12-year-old girl.
He said this was two youngsters engaging in sexual activity and he said this was the reality of the conduct of a significant minority of young people 'like it or not'.
Professor Sheila Green, Director of the Children's Research Centre at Trinity College Dublin gave evidence that an increasing number of young people were having sex before the age of consent.
It was almost normative behaviour she said and studies had found that in most cases it was consensual.
Thousands of young people were having sex under the age of consent she said. Thousands of boys were therefore liable to prosecution.
She said we may not like the idea of very young teenagers indulging in sexual activity but it is part of the everyday reality she said.
If every case like this one came to light she said, the courts would be full of cases like this because it is such a frequent activity.
The case is likely to continue until Friday.

Sorry if posted already, searched and had a look around and found nothing...
dioltas is offline  
Advertisement
16-12-2009, 19:40   #2
ciano1
Registered User
 
ciano1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,988
At least he's getting laid . . .
ciano1 is offline  
16-12-2009, 19:40   #3
4leto
Closed Account
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,915
How many here would have broke that law I know I did, in my teen years.
4leto is offline  
16-12-2009, 19:41   #4
winston82
Registered User
 
winston82's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 877
great thread op. some really interseting points you've made. keep up the good work
winston82 is offline  
16-12-2009, 19:41   #5
Cupcake_Crisis
Registered User
 
Cupcake_Crisis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Tallaght
Posts: 20,038
That is ridiculous! Two people broke the law in that situation, why should only 1 be punished??
Cupcake_Crisis is offline  
Advertisement
16-12-2009, 19:45   #6
jumpguy
Registered User
 
jumpguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Your retina
Posts: 8,157
Heard this on the news. It's extremely unfair and it's shameful our law could allow this to happen. The age of consent law is archaic. It should be dependent on the circumstance. TBH, the article is ambiguous in the nature the boy had sex to the girl, but it was consensual. It'd be the highest form of cruelty to convict the boy, and give him a horrible criminal record, and hence effectively destroy his life.
jumpguy is offline  
16-12-2009, 19:46   #7
Overheal
MegaMod X
 
Overheal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Clemson, SC
Posts: 37,327
Send a message via Skype™ to Overheal
Well, I know this will never happen, but if youre a minor and if you find yourself to be "Guilty" of the same offence as this Lad:

Come forth.

If truly there are Thousands of offending Teens, if they all came forward at once, the Courts would have two choices: Ammend the Law, or Imprison Thousands of Teens.
Overheal is offline  
16-12-2009, 19:46   #8
dioltas
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: tty7
Posts: 1,164
Quote:
Originally Posted by winston82 View Post
great thread op. some really interseting points you've made. keep up the good work
My sarcasm detector is going off the scale. I just wanted to let people know if they didn't already tbh because I think it's a terrible injustice.
dioltas is offline  
16-12-2009, 19:46   #9
Mike 1972
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 7,929
Quote:
Originally Posted by 4leto View Post
How many here would have broke that law I know I did, in my teen years.
Paedophile! Rapist! Sex offender!

(according to Irish law)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Overheal View Post
Thousands of Teens.
And brand them as "sex offenders" for life.

Presumably theyd have to go on that register thing as well
Mike 1972 is offline  
Thanks from:
Advertisement
16-12-2009, 19:46   #10
spitfireIRL
Registered User
 
spitfireIRL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 476
it's a stupid law anyway if they both consented there should be no problem!! PC gone mad
spitfireIRL is offline  
(3) thanks from:
16-12-2009, 19:46   #11
Borneo Fnctn
Registered User
 
Borneo Fnctn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: In Mambassa, in a bar room drinking gin.
Posts: 1,339
I hope he doesn't get convicted of this. It just wouldn't be right. How did it end up in the court anyway? Were they caught at it or what? Maybe it was he girl's parents.
Borneo Fnctn is offline  
16-12-2009, 19:49   #12
The_Minister
Moderator
 
The_Minister's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: The Capital City - Dublin
Posts: 9,271
Send a message via MSN to The_Minister
Quote:
Originally Posted by spitfireIRL View Post
it's a stupid law anyway if they both consented there should be no problem!! PC gone mad
So two twelve year olds who decide to play doctors and nurses should be ok?

I don't think it is a criminal matter if two people of the same age have sex, but there is such a thing as too young.
The_Minister is offline  
Thanks from:
16-12-2009, 19:49   #13
dioltas
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: tty7
Posts: 1,164
Quote:
Originally Posted by 4leto View Post
How many here would have broke that law I know I did, in my teen years.
Yeah, exactly. The whole situation would be laughable if it weren't for the consequences for this lad. A nation of rapists I tell ya!
Who's to say the lads aren't the ones being taken advantage of ffs? Maybe they should just prevent any physical contact between boys and girls until the age of 17.
dioltas is offline  
16-12-2009, 19:52   #14
Agricola
Registered User
 
Agricola's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Gobbler's Knob
Posts: 4,511
Its young feckers like this that have the country the way it is.......... Scandalous!
Agricola is offline  
Thanks from:
16-12-2009, 19:52   #15
spitfireIRL
Registered User
 
spitfireIRL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 476
Quote:
Originally Posted by The_Minister View Post
So two twelve year olds who decide to play doctors and nurses should be ok?

I don't think it is a criminal matter if two people of the same age have sex, but there is such a thing as too young.
two people who know what they're doing with their bodies wouldn't be playing doctor's and nurses. Yes, twelve is definitely too young, but i'm not too sure 14/15 is.

Sure there was a poll on here recently, check the figures . It's not exactly a small amount of people who had underage sex
spitfireIRL is offline  
Post Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Remove Text Formatting
Bold
Italic
Underline

Insert Image
Wrap [QUOTE] tags around selected text
 
Decrease Size
Increase Size
Please sign up or log in to join the discussion

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search



Share Tweet