![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Registered User
![]() |
70-200mm Canon f4L
How would people rate this lens. I'm thinking of getting it but I just want to know if it's a good one to use as a telephoto zoom lens?
At present I have a 70-300mm Sigma DG and I find some of the shots taken with it are soft and sometimes blurred. I know that I need to use a tripod to get the best image stabalization; not always practical unfortunately. Any advise is appreciated or if anyone has experience; please let me know. Thanks
__________________
Getting the trade unions to vote for cutbacks is like asking turkeys to vote for christmas Stephen O'Connell Photography follow me on twitter
|
|
|
|
|
Advertisement
|
|
To remove these adverts, please create an account, or log in! You must have an account to post anyway :-) |
|
|
#2 |
|
Registered User
![]() |
I have it and would definitely recommend it - it's priced very reasonably for what you are getting and very light and sharp. Disadvantages are that it's not a 2.8 and it's white
__________________
www.poolbegphoto.com |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Registered User
![]() |
it is a fantastic lens
its small enough to wonder round with all day and sharp wide open |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Registered User
![]() |
hmmm.. I don't know if I can justify the price. Anyone know where I can get it cheap?
__________________
Getting the trade unions to vote for cutbacks is like asking turkeys to vote for christmas Stephen O'Connell Photography follow me on twitter
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Deadly Sinner
![]() |
the 70-200 L (f4 and f2.8 with or without IS) is one of the sharpest zoom lens made by Canon. Had the f4L IS (until was stolen few months ago) and no doubt it's my favourite lens and am looking to get a new one.
Just can't decide whether to go for f2.8 or f4. Pretty much concern about the weight. The f2.8 is about 1.5kg while the f4 is more or less 700g. And the one with IS i think is weather sealed.
__________________
while we're on the subject, could we change the subject now? Boards.ie Photography Yearbook 2009 - Buy One (coz my photo is in it)!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Registered User
![]() |
Where did you get that from?? I can't find anything with IS for less than €1K.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Moderator
![]() |
keep an eye on adverts
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
Registered User
![]() |
Quote:
They're definitely IS are they?? And you bought them in a SHOP in Ireland? Jaysus H C. Cheapest I've come across second hand, even online, is €1100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Registered User
![]() |
I bought one (non IS) off adverts about a month and a half ago. I think I paid 450 or 475 somethin round that mark. I think it was a great buy, images and build quality are great in my opinion and I found the USM gives really quick focus (I use a 450D).... Id say cent for cent its the best lense I own next to my 50mm F1.8 and I have a few mid range lenses now at this stage.
If you're planning on shooting low light situations or sport regularly with it though Id suggest you might be better off stretching for the f2.8? Personally I couldnt justify the extra expense of the 2.8, frequency of use etc. By the way I had a 70-300mm Sigma DG lense too and believe you will find the Canon lense a nice upgrade ;-) (less the 100mm of course) Best of luck with it. Trev Last edited by Trev M; 21-10-2009 at 16:36. |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Registered User
![]() |
Thanks for all the advise. I'll see if I can track one down second hand
__________________
Getting the trade unions to vote for cutbacks is like asking turkeys to vote for christmas Stephen O'Connell Photography follow me on twitter
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Registered User
![]() |
I have the f4 with the IS, bought it on camerabox.co.uk new, cost around €850, it is a cracking lens, lovely and sharp and very accesible, I would highly recommend it.
90% of your shots will be above f4 so dont let the 2.8 talk throw you off unless you plan on doing alot of shooting indoors or dark areas I use mine outdoors for motorsport events and it works great
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Registered User
![]() |
I bought the IS version of the 70-200f4 on adverts.ie for €780 and it's a fantastic lens for daytime use.
I've also used it at gigs with a flash and the 200 came in really handy. 200mm Long end ![]() 70mm Wide end ![]() It's also only half the weight of the 2.8 version and that really makes a difference, then again the 2.8 has nice bokeh/background blur. Last edited by AnimalRights; 21-10-2009 at 21:28. |
|
|
|
| Thanks from: |
![]() |
|
|
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|