cant wait for this to start, traffic is going to be absolutely nuts, around Newlands X for a few years.
Thankfully I have a motorbike and will be able to wizz past.
I wish Mysterious was here to tell us all how it should be done.
| 13-06-2012, 11:52 | #301 |
|
Registered User
![]() |
cant wait for this to start, traffic is going to be absolutely nuts, around Newlands X for a few years.
Thankfully I have a motorbike and will be able to wizz past. I wish Mysterious was here to tell us all how it should be done. |
|
|
|
Advertisement
|
|
|
| 13-06-2012, 12:06 | #302 | |
|
Registered User
![]() |
Quote:
They do have that land to the side boarded up. Guessing temporary lanes going in there |
|
|
|
| 20-06-2012, 10:11 | #305 |
|
Registered User
![]() |
Just had an update from the NRA....
"The latest info regarding the proposed Newlands Cross scheme is that it is anticipated that the contract will be awarded in Q4 2012 with construction commencing immediately following the signing." |
|
|
| Thanks from: |
|
Advertisement
|
|
|
| 20-06-2012, 10:28 | #306 |
|
Registered User
![]() |
Just not good enough - AFAIK, our national finances are running ahead of target - IMO, the government should just decouple NLX and retender it on a state funded basis - the M11 could be rebundled with something like the M7 widening project to create a new PPP. BAM and BB should be ousted IMO.
|
|
|
| 20-06-2012, 10:51 | #307 | |
|
Registered User
![]() |
Quote:
On June 13th they said "Just been on to NRA today and informed me that contract is due to be awarded in July and work will commence as soon as contract is signed" And now a week later it's gone from July to October at earliest. FFS |
|
|
|
| Thanks from: |
| 20-06-2012, 12:23 | #308 |
|
Registered User
![]() |
That's very disappointing. It's a ridiculous hold up every day for thousands of people. Even the most basic feasability study would show a fast payback and benefit greatly outweighing cost.
The country is crying out for some construction jobs. To take a couple of hundred people off the dole and back paying taxes alone would suggest this is a no brainer. |
|
|
| (2) thanks from: |
| 20-06-2012, 13:11 | #309 | |
|
Registered User
![]() |
Quote:
But lets crunch some numbers to see what it could save if it takes 200 people off the dole. Allowing for an 18 month project (don't know the proposed timescale) the savings would be in the order of €188*200*78=€3m Let's just say we double that for miscellaneous benefits - 6m cost saved by the exchequer isn't exactly a great return - assuming they're all on the dole. Allowing for the average wage (no idea how realistic), taxes (incl prsi & usc) will be about €8,500 each - €1.7m. Okay we're up to about €8m in savings and taxes. How does that compare against the €180m cost of NX/N11. It's a nice bonus but an immediate (optimistic) return of 5% of the cost isn't a good enough reason to start. |
|
|
|
| (2) thanks from: |
|
Advertisement
|
|
|
| 20-06-2012, 15:39 | #310 |
|
Registered User
![]() |
antoobrien - I take your point but I would say you are underestimating these benefits and the knock on benefits quite substantially.
I don't know the details of the costs and I guess if they are still looking at tenders then this is unknown. However, taking your €180m, on a broad basis I would estimate appprox 20% is labour costs. Then taking 30% of this for taxes gives about €10m benefit alone. You also don't factor the effect this extra income would have on the wider economy. There will of course be knock on job benefits - e.g. the company supplying the raw materials will probably need additional people etc. The long term economic benefit is also very clear in terms of the huge amounts of lost time that will now be saved and the increased attractiveness of Ireland as a place to do business. |
|
|
| Thanks from: |
| 20-06-2012, 15:57 | #311 | |||
|
Registered User
![]() |
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
I don't believe that the knock on effects of the income will be huge. We're talking what up to 30m (which is about right for my tax predictions)? Oh btw you've missed out on VAT and excise on the on supplies & equipment (which I didn't bother with). Point taken, but I'd argue that a lot of the suppliers (e.g. Lagan) would probably end up consolidating their business rather than bringing in new people. I believe that the benefits to the suppliers, combined with the extra income would help top stabilize things in the area - which if it can be quantified may well be a good enough reason to start. But I'd be very skeptical. Last edited by antoobrien; 20-06-2012 at 16:04. Reason: spelling |
|||
|
|
| 28-06-2012, 12:30 | #313 |
|
Registered User
![]() |
spacetweek - how can you tell the hold up isn't on the governments end? What are they waiting on to award the contract?
Is the recently announced change to the European Investment Bank have any impact on speeding this up? |
|
|
| 28-06-2012, 14:50 | #314 |
|
Registered User
![]() |
|
|
|
| 29-06-2012, 09:15 | #315 |
|
Registered User
![]() |
|
|
|