Quote:
Originally Posted by DarrenG
Any plans to change from 'contacts recent albums' to 'contacts recent photos'? I've noticed when you add a new photo to an existing album, your contacts have no way of knowing it's been added.
|
True, we don't have contacts recent photos... you are right. We'll look into adding that.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Covey
Theres a workaround Darren
Photos - Recent Photos
|
This will give everyone's recent photos rather than filtered by your contacts.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Covey
Marcus, in general the site needs a bit of an update. Some things promised a while ago now, but no movement. I'd be interested in using it more, but not really in the present format. Protection Issues being a biggie + general site usage seems to have come down a lot.
|
Tommie, we have to hold our hands up and say that development of new features has slowed towards the end of last year as other priorities took over. We are back on a big development push again and are currerntly working on groups which we hope to have in place before the Irish Blog Awards (
http://awards.ie). We are sponsoring the "Best Photo Blog" and also the photography on the night (@rymus is taking the shots) and would like to have a facility for everyone to contribute their photos by then.
Site usage is way up, it's just that there has been quite a shift towards private profiles recently which obviously don't appear to the public...
Following groups we then introducing the marketplace which will feature the protection you are looking for and the opportunity to sell your work... Hold tight!
Quote:
Originally Posted by whyulittle
I've found the site irritatingly slow to load for me the past week or two.
|
We have noticed the same thing and are investigating what is going on. The problem is not with our site, but likely with some external infrastructure. If you find a page loads particularly slowly open up the page source and down the bottom you'll find the time it took us to produce the page. It will look like:
<!--[MA-UI:OK][TIME:14ms]-->
The above states it took us 14ms to render the page. Normally you will not notice anything less than 200ms and on slow pages that we've noticed, the time has consistently been < 100ms. I'll let you know what we find out.
Has anyone else noticed slow page loading and if so can you look at the source and let us know what the time in ms was...
Cheers, Marcus