Boards.ie

**spooky donkey** · 11-06-2007, 10:48

Well after watching 28 weeks later with out seeing 28 days I thought the first film would be a disapointment. It was most certianaly not. Im know im a bit late posting about this as every one had seen this apart from me. But it does prove one thing ya dont need a big budget to make a great movie. But it helps. I think the 2nd one is the slightly better movie but theres not a lot in it. So heres to 28 months later, a movie ill look forward to if they ever make it.

qwertplaywert · 15-06-2007, 16:03

i doubt it will get made, days later made twice as much as weeks later on a budget much smaller,and on a smaller release

Average-Ro · 17-06-2007, 17:30

Wasn't there a lot of talk about a third one being made though?

Timans · 17-06-2007, 17:36

Nah, the first one was much better. Dealt with the effects of the Virus much better I thougt. The second one was too much action for me.

Ending of bother films were very disappointing.

**spooky donkey** · 04-07-2007, 20:10

you dont like action Timans? watch soap operas or chick flicks.

qwertplaywert · 04-07-2007, 20:13

ive heard reports now that fox atomic are not that interested in horror movies anymore, and that 28 weeks later will have to do really well on dvd for even a slight chance of months

**spooky donkey** · 25-07-2007, 13:07

ah mores the pity. But I do think it will do well on DVD, just how well remains to be seen.

bryan philips · 12-08-2007, 14:20

Must say I enjoyed the second film a lot more. A definite dvd purchase!

qwertplaywert · 12-08-2007, 18:19

Although it is early days, and much depends on the dvd, Danny Boyle has said he intererested in directing a third installment, and has the story in his mind atm.

Leonitos · 17-08-2007, 10:18

Quote:

Originally Posted by spooky donkey

Well after watching 28 weeks later with out seeing 28 days I thought the first film would be a disapointment. It was most certianaly not. Im know im a bit late posting about this as every one had seen this apart from me. But it does prove one thing ya dont need a big budget to make a great movie. But it helps. I think the 2nd one is the slightly better movie but theres not a lot in it. So heres to 28 months later, a movie ill look forward to if they ever make it.

28 days later was a good movie however 28 weeks later was total crap.

senordingdong · 12-09-2007, 10:37

3rd one has already gotten the green light.
That's the only information that has been released about it, that and the fact that it will be set in Paris.

Not thrilled with the idea of what they can do with the story from there...I'd much prefer to see 28 Hours Later tbh.

Thundercracker · 08-10-2007, 15:08

Quote:

Originally Posted by Timans

The second one was too much action for me.

Ending of both films were very disappointing.

Agreed

11-06-2007, 10:48	#1
spooky donkey Moderator Join Date: Jan 2002 Location: Dublin, Blanchardstown Posts: 4,826 Adverts \| Friends Mod: Horror	28 days later, much later Well after watching 28 weeks later with out seeing 28 days I thought the first film would be a disapointment. It was most certianaly not. Im know im a bit late posting about this as every one had seen this apart from me. But it does prove one thing ya dont need a big budget to make a great movie. But it helps. I think the 2nd one is the slightly better movie but theres not a lot in it. So heres to 28 months later, a movie ill look forward to if they ever make it.

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version Email this Page	Search this Thread: Advanced Search

15-06-2007, 16:03	#2
qwertplaywert Registered User Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: Dundalk Posts: 3,376 Adverts \| Friends	i doubt it will get made, days later made twice as much as weeks later on a budget much smaller,and on a smaller release

17-06-2007, 17:30	#3
Average-Ro Registered User Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: Galway Posts: 986 Adverts \| Friends	Wasn't there a lot of talk about a third one being made though?

17-06-2007, 17:36	#4
Timans Registered User Join Date: Jun 2005 Posts: 2,321 Adverts \| Friends	Nah, the first one was much better. Dealt with the effects of the Virus much better I thougt. The second one was too much action for me. Ending of bother films were very disappointing.

04-07-2007, 20:10	#5
spooky donkey Moderator Join Date: Jan 2002 Location: Dublin, Blanchardstown Posts: 4,826 Adverts \| Friends Mod: Horror	you dont like action Timans? watch soap operas or chick flicks.

04-07-2007, 20:13	#6
qwertplaywert Registered User Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: Dundalk Posts: 3,376 Adverts \| Friends	ive heard reports now that fox atomic are not that interested in horror movies anymore, and that 28 weeks later will have to do really well on dvd for even a slight chance of months

25-07-2007, 13:07	#7
spooky donkey Moderator Join Date: Jan 2002 Location: Dublin, Blanchardstown Posts: 4,826 Adverts \| Friends Mod: Horror	ah mores the pity. But I do think it will do well on DVD, just how well remains to be seen.

12-08-2007, 14:20	#8
bryan philips Registered User Join Date: Aug 2007 Posts: 35 Adverts \| Friends	Must say I enjoyed the second film a lot more. A definite dvd purchase!

12-08-2007, 18:19	#9
qwertplaywert Registered User Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: Dundalk Posts: 3,376 Adverts \| Friends	Although it is early days, and much depends on the dvd, Danny Boyle has said he intererested in directing a third installment, and has the story in his mind atm.

12-09-2007, 10:37	#11
senordingdong Registered User Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: Homer Posts: 8,951 Adverts \| Friends	3rd one has already gotten the green light. That's the only information that has been released about it, that and the fact that it will be set in Paris. Not thrilled with the idea of what they can do with the story from there...I'd much prefer to see 28 Hours Later tbh.