Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

FCC assessment of broadband Internet access is misleading

  • 18-08-2005 8:45am
    #1
    Registered Users Posts: 1,500 ✭✭✭


    Not another regulator misinforming its public...
    A new report released today by Free Press, the Consumer Federation of America and Consumers Union shows that a recent FCC assessment of broadband Internet access is misleading and glosses over serious problems behind an ever-widening digital divide.
    "By overstating broadband availability and portraying anti-competitive policies as good for consumers, the FCC is trying to erect a façade of success. But if the president's goal of universal, affordable high-speed Internet access by 2007 is to be achieved, policymakers in Washington must change course."

    The report's findings call into question a number of the FCC's conclusions:
    • The FCC overstates broadband penetration rates. The FCC report considers a ZIP code covered by broadband service if just one person subscribes. No consideration is given to price, speed or availability of that connection throughout the area.
    • The FCC misrepresents exactly how many connections are "high-speed." The FCC defines "high-speed" as 200 kilobits per second...
    • The United States remains 16th in the world in broadband penetration per capita. The United States also ranks 16th in terms of broadband growth rates, suggesting our world ranking won't improve any time soon....
    • Despite FCC claims, digital divide persists and is growing wider. Broadband adoption is largely dependent on socio-economic status....
    • Reports of a broadband "price war" are misleading. Analysis of "low-priced" introductory offers by companies like SBC and Comcast reveal them to be little more than bait-and-switch gimmicks.
    • The FCC ignores the lack of competition in the broadband market. Cable and DSL providers control almost 98 percent of the residential and small-business broadband market. Yet the FCC recently eliminated "open access" requirements for DSL companies to lease their lines, rules that fostered the only true competition in the broadband market.

    I'll leave this as the last comment:
    "The FCC is trying to put the best face on this problem it can, but the people who can't afford or don't have access to high-speed Internet know the truth," said Mark Cooper, research director of the Consumer Federation of America. "Affordable high-speed Internet means stronger economic growth, more educational opportunities and exposure to diverse points of view. If the FCC continues to ignore reality, the gap between the haves and have-nots will become too wide to bridge."

    Press release: http://www.freepress.net/press/release.php?id=86
    Full report (PDF): http://www.freepress.net/docs/broadband_report.pdf


Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 849 ✭✭✭jwt


    well spotted.

    John


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,144 ✭✭✭eircomtribunal


    jwt wrote:
    The FCC report considers a ZIP code covered by broadband service if just one person subscribes.
    Hopefully ComReg do not see it. Could give them even funnier ideas than they already have.
    "All 32 counties now dls enabled..."

    An OECD guy with whom I spoke about ComReg's misinformation with regards to dsl availability, told me exactly what you are quoting here about the US incumbent-and-FCC spin-doctoring (counting a zip code area as enabled after a single customer is connected), which the OECD has to deal with when sourcing and using data.

    P.


Advertisement