Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all,
Vanilla are planning an update to the site on April 24th (next Wednesday). It is a major PHP8 update which is expected to boost performance across the site. The site will be down from 7pm and it is expected to take about an hour to complete. We appreciate your patience during the update.
Thanks all.

What is wrong with Ireland?

13

Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,179 ✭✭✭White Knight


    I think we all know whats wrong and you are just too afraid to say it ...

    It is clearly the Jersey's

    The only reasonable explanation ... I think the lads circulation is being affected. Coupled that without the inspiration of the "proper" shade of green. Need I say anymore ... :rolleyes:


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,686 ✭✭✭EdgarAllenPoo


    I think we all know whats wrong and you are just too afraid to say it ...

    It is clearly the Jersey's

    The only reasonable explanation ... I think the lads circulation is being affected. Coupled that without the inspiration of the "proper" shade of green. Need I say anymore ... :rolleyes:


    I said that last night, if it wasn't for the jerseys we'd be All Black beaters;)


    Seriously though the IRFU made a balls up in giving EOS an extentions before the WC. The only reason I can think that they did this is if we lose who would they get to replace him?

    One other thing, seeing as EOS is the Bertie Ahern of rugby, how badly would we have to play/lose before he decided to nut up and resign?


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,985 ✭✭✭skelliser


    carney has to play, at least come on at some stage


  • Registered Users Posts: 17,300 ✭✭✭✭razorblunt


    As for a replacement for EOS, Eddie Jones is moving to England in search of jobs after the WC he would have been the perfect choice.


  • Registered Users Posts: 6,889 ✭✭✭tolosenc


    You cannot mean this. Dempsey at 13? Duffy? Forwards okay but that is a terrible back line selection. You have to go hickey - darcy - bod - horgan - murphy

    Yeah, sorry, Dempsey and Duffy switched.

    Hickie and D'arcy have been atrocious, and Horgan just isn't fit. There was a while when BO'D and D'arcy swithced the centre positions, giving BO'd a different angle from which to work.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 2,686 ✭✭✭EdgarAllenPoo


    Here's a thought. If New Zealand do choke might Graham Henry be looking for a job and would Ireland want him?


  • Registered Users Posts: 11,987 ✭✭✭✭zAbbo


    GDM wrote:
    Here's a thought. If New Zealand do choke might Graham Henry be looking for a job and would Ireland want him?
    No way, *shudders at the thought*


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,686 ✭✭✭EdgarAllenPoo


    As annoying as he is he would do a better job than EOS. I'd love to see what he could get out of our forwards.


    Bob Dylan doesn't fancy our chances in the WC:D

    http://www.dylanmessaging.com/messages/UYME-R7E2-OGPN-ZZAC-XRY8?commentor-name=Ger+Martin&commentor-email=gerarddmartin%40yahoo.co.uk


  • Registered Users Posts: 709 ✭✭✭wowy




  • Registered Users Posts: 32,136 ✭✭✭✭is_that_so


    Finally a bit more honesty out of EOS. Not much hope for the rest of us if he can't figure it out.:rolleyes:
    And a BBC blog with suggestions on the team, much of which has been said here.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 2,686 ✭✭✭EdgarAllenPoo


    O'Sullivan has vowed not to change the expansive game he blames for his side's catalogue of mistakes since the World Cup began.

    How can he blame it for their mistakes and not change it? That defies logic.
    "It's much easier to sit back in the pocket and kick the ball up into the air or whack it into the corners and wait for the opposition to make mistakes.

    Would that not be a good idea then?:rolleyes: Muppet
    But we're trying to play a style of rugby which, when it works, is very successful and has served us well.

    Not so far. Christ on a bike. Am I the only one who thinks he's lost his mind. It's bad enough playing the way Ireland have been but to say that that's a good thing and that it won't change is moronic.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 19,341 ✭✭✭✭Chucky the tree


    I'm still waiting for us to start playing......




    Put your feet up and get comfortable, you'll be waiting awhile.


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,436 ✭✭✭bugler


    I really hope I'm wrong, but I get the feeling that this team with EOS at the helm has shot its bolt. No one genuinely seems to know what's wrong, and aside from rumblings about ROG's personal troubles affecting him I have a source that says there is no major turbulence in the squad.

    EOS, for all his qualities (and he has many), isn't a creative or risk-taking coach capable of sparking great things. His refusal to countenance changes for games, when every other side has done so, is his most distinguishing characteristic as a coach. Go away with all this "we haven't got the depth" bollocks. There is no compelling reason Alan Quinlan and Brian Carney could not have featured in at least one of those two opening games. None. We'll never know if they would have made a difference, because EOS wouldn't take the chance.

    EOS is a percentages coach. He's happy to win more than he loses, happy to beat the teams we 'should' beat, and never too disappointed when we lose to those 'better' than us. He's distrustful of change, the arch-conservative. He's always at least a game (and often more) behind when it comes to recognising players who need to be swapped.

    Because of the type of coach we have, our team is stale. They're struggling to hit form, and struggling with trying too hard as some of the players panic and attempt to shake the team single-handedly from the malaise. I noted during the Namibia game that aside from the knock-ons, our back play was horrible stilted. Every move had an awful semi-coordinated stutter to it. Reverse passes were a yard behind the target. When it works (Trimble's try in the Autumn) it can look impressive. When it doesn't, it means you don't cross the gain-line.

    There is no off-the-cuff brilliance. Do we not have the best centres in the world? One of the best backlines?

    We have 4 more years of his reign to come. Regardless of what you think of the man, you need to admit that sometimes a coach has taken a team as far as they can go. There is a natural life to a regime. It shouldn't be artificially prolonged if the results and performances aren't there? Is his time up?

    If you put your logical hat on, do you really think Ireland can get out of this group? And is that enough? Will a meek surrender to the ABs count as a success?

    Time for Irish rugby to consider what it should be aiming for. Is this it?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 98 ✭✭Danie Gerber


    It's a mistery..

    This is near the same Irish team that did so well in the 6 nations, only they're better rested and better conditioned. So what's wrong?

    IMO:

    They've tried to force the game and tried to play expansive rugby. Why? Because they were told at every convenience that they're probably the best backline in the world and that they were playing inferior opposition. So one, 2, 3 mistakes, a few handling errors and all of a sudden that confidence start wavering.

    What do they do? They force it even more, with less success. Now if you're Namibia or Georgia this is a great boost. All of a sudden you've a chance. They tackle harder, ruck better and generally lift their own game...

    What should they have done? Settle back, get ROG to kick the corners. Take it up around the fringes with the forwards and wait for the oppo to make mistakes which they inevitably will. Do that for half an hour and you suck the life out of the Georgians, Namibians.

    The way SA beat England. England was bad in fairness, but SA just kicked for position, took the 3 points whenever they got close, didn'tgive away any penalties and after a while the English started leaving gaps.

    It's called Munster rugby and Ireland should play some of it..


  • Registered Users Posts: 13,078 ✭✭✭✭jmayo


    Heard very good summation, from a friend that works for one of the provinces, of the Irish setup under Eddie O'Sullivan:
    "Form is temporary, selection is permanent"

    The first team guys are assured of being picked no matter how cr** they play. Maybe the second string guys are not as good on paper or on the pitch, but why do we continue with the same setup even though it is not working.
    What did Jordan Murphy do to EOS ?
    Could Reddan form a partnership with Tesco boy, or is he out of the equation because they didn't go to school together?

    There is absolutely no fire in the bellies, there is no one throwing their bodies around and it looks like they are just going through the motions.

    Also the amount of spin & PR speak coming from Eddie and now the players is appalling. Stringer was talking "total sh**e" like a politican the other night.
    EOS definetly hung around with Alastair Campbell too much while in NZ.
    Maybe that is his future career.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,929 ✭✭✭raven136


    noel mannion or mick quinn msaid on newstalk the other night that certain players know that eos just doesnt like the look of certain players and they know it.Take murphy and reddan,two total stars in england but they know that barring serious injury they wont even make the bench.Surely this has to affect players and morale.
    Quinlan should come in and i would prefer to see murphy on the wings.But because eos has never brought the reserve players in in the past two years can we honestly expect them to make a big impact.

    young lad sitting at home now with the x factor we all want to see and think ireland need.Luke Fitzgerald should be there,pity


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,530 ✭✭✭dub_skav


    First of all Eddie O'Sullivan is not up to the job, never was. He got lucky with a very good crop of players hungry for success. Now those players are older and less hungry, they need the coach to step in and get them back to winning ways. He is incapable of this. The fact that the IRFU renewed his contract shows just how clueless they are.

    Players that just aren't performing:
    Best, Horan, O'Connell, Leamy, Wallace, Stringer, D'Arcy, Hickie, Horgan.

    Obviously all of those players can't be replaced at once, it would destroy the team. But, Flannery in, Best/Quinlan in for Leamy, Boss/Reddan in, Carney and Murphy in for Hickie and Horgan.
    Possibly move B'OD to 12 and bring in Trimble.

    Change is needed, fringe players with hunger need to freshen up the attitude.

    Also, Eddie needs to realise that expansive rugby isn't our forte. We play kick the corners boring rugby with occasional flashes of brilliance to make the difference, the current plan of give it to D'Arcy and see what happens isn't really good enough return for a professional coach's wages.


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,436 ✭✭✭bugler


    dub_skav wrote:

    Players that just aren't performing:
    Best, Horan, O'Connell, Leamy, Wallace, Stringer, D'Arcy, Hickie, Horgan.

    Obviously all of those players can't be replaced at once, it would destroy the team. But, Flannery in, Best/Quinlan in for Leamy, Boss/Reddan in, Carney and Murphy in for Hickie and Horgan.

    RE: Leamy. He can't, and arguably doesn't deserve to be replaced. There is no other 8 in the squad unless you count Ferris, which I don't tbh. I think he's a 6.

    Best or Quinlan couldn't be put at 8 for Argentina or France.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,530 ✭✭✭dub_skav


    Easterby can play 8. A back row of Best, Quinlan and Easterby would certainly be aggressive enough to take on anybody. Might be the kick up the arse the lads need.
    There is the possibility of them blowing up, but that's not much of a risk compared to the form of the incumbants.




  • Theres no competition for places, complacency.


    EOS needs to show balls and drop the big name guys who arent performing....Paul OConnell being one.


    The lineout isnt working and Malcolm O Kelly should come in to fix this (slate me all u want, quinlan more physical etc but we need the lineout platform.)

    Flannerry will come in out of necessity.

    Id be tempted to drop Leamy since he was so bad on Saturday but I wouldnt trust Ferris against the French.


    Id bring Best in for Easterby.

    Boss for Stringer.

    Murphy for Dempsey.

    Trimble for Horgan.


    A shake up like that would wake people up, get them n their toes and realise u have to fight for your place.



    Unfortunately steady Eddie will probably pick the same 15 again bar the change at hooker which is forced on him.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 432 ✭✭Linford


    Cannot understand why some of you are calling for Dempsey to be replaced by Murphy. Murphy needs to come into the team alright, but in place of Horgan, who was woeful on Saturday, Dempsey was Ireland's best player (although this is more of a reflection on the Irish team than Dempsey's good play).

    A few others are calling for the replacement of O'Callaghan, why? He has been the better of the two second rows, if either of them should go (and neither will) it should be O'Connell.

    I am a big fan of Easterby, but he has to go and not just from the 15, from the 22, bring in Best and Quinlan.

    Its a blessing that Best (the hooker) has broken his thumb...

    I think the only players dropped will be; Easterby, Shane Horgan and the enforced replacement of Best.

    Eddie won't have the guts to bring in Reddin for Stringer


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 432 ✭✭Linford




    Trimble for Horgan.


    Trimble? He was pretty impressive against Namibia;)


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 10,076 Mod ✭✭✭✭marco_polo


    Theres no competition for places, complacency.


    EOS needs to show balls and drop the big name guys who arent performing....Paul OConnell being one.


    The lineout isnt working and Malcolm O Kelly should come in to fix this (slate me all u want, quinlan more physical etc but we need the lineout platform.)

    Flannerry will come in out of necessity.

    Id be tempted to drop Leamy since he was so bad on Saturday but I wouldnt trust Ferris against the French.


    Id bring Best in for Easterby.

    Boss for Stringer.

    Murphy for Dempsey.

    Trimble for Horgan.


    A shake up like that would wake people up, get them n their toes and realise u have to fight for your place.



    Unfortunately steady Eddie will probably pick the same 15 again bar the change at hooker which is forced on him.

    Broadly agree with you on most points. However I would take Quinlan over Mal myself as I think Mals best days are well behind him gone. Also Qunilan a good solid option in the lineout probably as effective as DOC is but not in as poor form generally.

    Think Reddan is worth a shot too as I don't think Boss is up to it against a top team either to be honest. He still looks too ponderous for me and his passing was only barely than Stringer when he came on, for example look at that pass he put on ROGs bootlaces in the in goal area against Georgia at a critical moment, it was almost stringer-esque. Reddan is unproven at test level but I think it is a risk worth taking.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 30 RonBonJovi


    Trimble should be brought in but not for Horgan.Horgan was rusty after being out with an injury.Hickie hasn't performed for the last three matches at least.

    I'd bring in Trimble for Hickie,Best for Easterby,Young for Horan and Boss for Stringer


  • Registered Users Posts: 11,987 ✭✭✭✭zAbbo


    Flannery for Best at 2
    Best for Easterby at 6
    Boss for Stringer at 9
    Trimble for Hickie at 11
    Murphy for Horgan at 14

    Bench
    Best
    Sheehan
    Quinlan
    Ferris
    Stringer
    Wallace
    Horgan


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,436 ✭✭✭bugler


    Easterby can play 8.

    No, he can't. When (and against who) has he ever played 8? You've picked the back row who does least carrying as an 8.

    By the way, it has been fairly obvious to me (and judging by the reaction of posters and journos to the first two games) that Easterby has been the most disappointing of the back row. The back row for me would be either Best or Quinlan at 6, with the other on the bench. Tell each of them to give hell for fupping leather for 40 minutes or so.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,929 ✭✭✭raven136


    boss is not the right scrum half for the french game,too slow in his pass and its obvious to his opposite number he makes a half break every time.Reddan would be much better but wont be brought it.despite what everyone is saying eos will not make unenforced changes


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,436 ✭✭✭bugler


    raven136 wrote:
    Reddan would be much better but wont be brought it.despite what everyone is saying eos will not make unenforced changes


    Hah :)


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,981 ✭✭✭Diarmuid


    Murphy for Dempsey.

    Have to disagree here. There are so many poorly performing Irish players that it makes no sense to drop one of the few that are putting in a decent performance. Hickey or Horgan could both be replaced by Murphy


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 2,530 ✭✭✭dub_skav


    Sorry Bugler, you're probably right. I was getting confused about Easterby playing for Scarlets,knew he played elsewhere than 6, but it's 7 not 8.

    In any case, everybody seems to be singling out Easterby from the backrow, where I think Leamy and Wallace have been far worse - Wallace anonymous and Leamy poor.

    Obviously another 8 should have been brought, why not give Ferris a try?

    If (I hope when) Leamy has a stormer on Friday I will be called an idiot, but picking a guy playing badly because you have no other options is a sad state of affairs.

    My main gripe though is the pointless Argentinian tour. They should have played a mixture of first choice players with up and comers, then a different mixture for the next test, so no first choice guys had to play twice. Then we could see how the untried guys get on playing with the established players.

    All that we saw from that tour was what our team would be like if our first choice xv all got injured.


Advertisement