Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all,
Vanilla are planning an update to the site on April 24th (next Wednesday). It is a major PHP8 update which is expected to boost performance across the site. The site will be down from 7pm and it is expected to take about an hour to complete. We appreciate your patience during the update.
Thanks all.

How old is your gun? Show us yours

Options
24

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 26 rookman


    BrownTrout wrote: »
    AV Marroccini of Italy.
    Made in 1986, Dad has it since before I was born.
    Only licenced it before Christmas and already I've put more rounds through it in less than a year than Dad did all the years he has had it according to him!

    Very nice.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,717 ✭✭✭LB6


    Anschutz Match 54 -
    1964


  • Site Banned Posts: 40 shooterjay


    i have a unique x-51 , late 60's ? cant post pics but its a beautie.


  • Registered Users Posts: 856 ✭✭✭Tawny Owl


    Tawny Owl wrote: »
    Although I dont have a photo as yet I have just applied for a BSA Majestic in 30-06 yesterday, where could I get info as to where to look on the rifle so I could age the rifle, I know it was in storage in the Phoenix Park for over 30 years. and has sat in a safe for the last 8 years. in great condition not a mark on the barrel it looks like it's a mauser bolt set up.

    Hi All,
    The Super phoned me last Sunday evening asking to give him 2 reasons as to why he should grant this rifle, now to say I was P###ed off with is comment is an understatement, but anyway its granted and I should have the paperwork in the next few days, where I will then collect and post a photo.;);):D:D.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,135 ✭✭✭323


    Have this 17 years or so, only found out how to determine the age from the serial number recently.

    1963, Browning FN Safari Grade, in .270 Win.

    [IMG][/img]20131015_143106.jpg

    “Follow the trend lines, not the headlines,”



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 5,504 ✭✭✭tac foley


    My oldest rifle is a MkII Snider conversion from a P53 rifle, dated 1862. Does that count?

    tac


  • Registered Users Posts: 5,504 ✭✭✭tac foley


    @TawnyOwl - As it is a British-made rifle it will have good and clear and dateable proof mark stamps on the barrel and action. Post pics and we can date it.

    The Unique rifle [made in the Basque region of the Pyrenees in Hendaye] will also be dateable. Early 1960's pre-dates the CIP Agreement, and IF the rifle came via England then it would have had to have been proofed prior to sale to the public.

    tac


  • Registered Users Posts: 856 ✭✭✭Tawny Owl


    tac foley wrote: »
    @TawnyOwl - As it is a British-made rifle it will have good and clear and dateable proof mark stamps on the barrel and action. Post pics and we can date it.

    The Unique rifle [made in the Basque region of the Pyrenees in Hendaye] will also be dateable. Early 1960's pre-dates the CIP Agreement, and IF the rifle came via England then it would have had to have been proofed prior to sale to the public.

    tac

    Thanks for replying I cant wait to get the Rifle, as I also own a .243 still waiting on the approval letter so I can go to the Post Office, thought I would at least have it before the weekend, but looks like its on a desk somewhere.:confused::confused:

    Cheers.


  • Registered Users Posts: 856 ✭✭✭Tawny Owl


    Got the BSA 30-06 today has some marks but I cant date it, has on the barrell
    BP BV NP all with the crown above them under that it has NC41GRs


  • Registered Users Posts: 286 ✭✭Mr.Flibble


    Tawny Owl wrote: »
    Got the BSA 30-06 today has some marks but I can't date it, has on the barrel
    BP BV NP all with the crown above them under that it has NC41GRs

    This page http://www.airgunspares.com/store/content/87/BSA/ (scroll down for c/f) may be of interest, although the codes don't gel with the "number" you've given. What's your serial number (or some of it), and is your barrel original?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 856 ✭✭✭Tawny Owl


    Mr.Flibble wrote: »
    This page http://www.airgunspares.com/store/content/87/BSA/ (scroll down for c/f) may be of interest, although the codes don't gel with the "number" you've given. What's your serial number (or some of it), and is your barrel original?

    Stripped the barrell out of the stock yesterday to clean grease and dirt, and a bolt that was too long needed filing down it was hindering the removal of the bolt, I think I saw some other marks on the underside of the barrell, I will check over the weekend and up load the photos.


  • Registered Users Posts: 5,504 ✭✭✭tac foley


    This being a BSA rifle, it will have Birmingham Proof House marks. They take the form of two crossed sceptres, and three letters/numbers in the spaces, in addition to later circles as shown below. There should also be a calibre, eg .243 Win, and a chamber length in inches, eg 2.05", chamber pressure expressed in long tons per square inch, eg 19.5 TONS PER [square symbol]".

    The other stamps mean -

    BP = Birmingham Proof

    NP = Nitro proof

    V = view [posh for inspection]

    Please tell us what the letters are in this fashion -

    ? X ?

    Clue - A X B - the number '1' appears in the lower space. This combination dates from January 1950, with #1 - senior examiner. The higher the number, the less senior the 'rank/seniority' of the inspector.

    Sooooooooooooooooooooooooo -

    A X B = 1950 - to Z X B = 1974 - there is NO letter I to save confunglement with number 1.

    If there is a circle instead, without sceptres, as in A B - this dates from 1975 to K B 1984

    After this date, again with crossed sceptres, beginning with L X C [1985] and ending Z X C in 1997.

    Your rifle is likely to fit in the middle era.

    tac


  • Registered Users Posts: 13,034 ✭✭✭✭It wasn't me!


    323 wrote: »
    Have this 17 years or so, only found out how to determine the age from the serial number recently.

    1963, Browning FN Safari Grade, in .270 Win.

    [IMG][/img]20131015_143106.jpg

    Now that's a beauty.


  • Registered Users Posts: 5,504 ✭✭✭tac foley


    What a real pleasure it is to see such a beautiful rifle made of wood and steel, with its original iron sights at front and back and all that lovely polished action parts.

    The only thing that spoils it somewhat for me is that somebody else owns it.......................however, I'll send you my address, just in case you are ever feeling generously disposed :)

    tac


  • Registered Users Posts: 5,504 ✭✭✭tac foley


    @Tawny Owl - if your gun has BP, NP and so on, then somewhere on it it MUST have the crossed sceptres as well - usually on the barrel adjacent to the action ring, and on the action adjacent to the barrel.

    That, Sir, is the law.

    The NC41GRNS stands for the recommended load of 41gr of 'a' non-specific nitrocellulose propellant - not a lot of use unless you know the type of powder though.

    tac


  • Registered Users Posts: 856 ✭✭✭Tawny Owl


    tac foley wrote: »
    This being a BSA rifle, it will have Birmingham Proof House marks. They take the form of two crossed sceptres, and three letters/numbers in the spaces, in addition to later circles as shown below. There should also be a calibre, eg .243 Win, and a chamber length in inches, eg 2.05", chamber pressure expressed in long tons per square inch, eg 19.5 TONS PER [square symbol]".

    The other stamps mean -

    BP = Birmingham Proof

    NP = Nitro proof

    V = view [posh for inspection]

    Please tell us what the letters are in this fashion -

    ? X ?

    Clue - A X B - the number '1' appears in the lower space. This combination dates from January 1950, with #1 - senior examiner. The higher the number, the less senior the 'rank/seniority' of the inspector.

    Sooooooooooooooooooooooooo -

    A X B = 1950 - to Z X B = 1974 - there is NO letter I to save confunglement with number 1.

    If there is a circle instead, without sceptres, as in A B - this dates from 1975 to K B 1984

    After this date, again with crossed sceptres, beginning with L X C [1985] and ending Z X C in 1997.

    Your rifle is likely to fit in the middle era.

    tac

    Thanks for all the info I dont have the two crossed sceptres anywhere on the Rifle, its a 30-06, I did take it apart over the weekend and found stamped under the barrell the following, B2 and some other marks photos to follow, home computer giving trouble at the moment.


  • Registered Users Posts: 856 ✭✭✭Tawny Owl


    Hi tac can you tell from these marks how old the rifle is please.

    Will upload more.


  • Registered Users Posts: 856 ✭✭✭Tawny Owl


    More photos.


  • Registered Users Posts: 856 ✭✭✭Tawny Owl


    Yet more


  • Registered Users Posts: 5,504 ✭✭✭tac foley


    @Tawny Owl - Your images are about forty times bigger than my 27" screen - I can't read them, sorry.

    However, YOU have the gun in your hands and can see the serial number - the prefix letters on the serial number give the date -

    7B .30 .'60 Springfield Hunter L.A. Imperial 1956 - 1964
    7D Imperial Featherweight 1957 - 1959
    7E Majestic 1965 - 1971
    7G Majestic 1960 - 1966
    7L Monarch 1st Pattern 1966 - 1971
    7M Monarch 2nd Pattern 1968 - 1972

    That's all I can help you with.

    tac


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 286 ✭✭Mr.Flibble


    Tawny Owl wrote: »
    Yet more

    Ah, now things are clearer. This is not a Monarch/Majestic type rifle as I (& I suspect Tac also) assumed. It appears to be a converted P14 or M17.

    I think the proof marks are pre-1955.

    I would speculate that it is 1949 - 1953 and the serial number, if you can find it* would have an "H" prefix.




    * If you can't, I'm wondering what it says on your firearms cert?


  • Registered Users Posts: 286 ✭✭Mr.Flibble


    tac foley wrote: »
    Sorry, I can't see only maybe a square inch at a time, so I gave up trying.

    By converted I'm assuming that you mean sporterized?

    Sorry I couldn't be more useful.

    tac

    Sporterized - yes, but done professionally, not by Bubba.

    Googling would indicate it's a "Model E" - rifle (there was evidently also a Model E motorcycle).


  • Registered Users Posts: 5,504 ✭✭✭tac foley


    Mr Flibble - I've just had a look on mrs tac's laptop, which is western and I can actually see the images a bit smaller, but I'd like to see the bolt side before I go any further with and identification.

    The calibre marking is for the .30-06 Springfield, as is the chambering, but the bullet weight of 220gr is that of the original .30-03 Government calibre - a long obsolete and short-lived offering that saw use in an underlever action as well as the military rifle that took over from the .3o-40 Krag-Jorgenson.

    The barrel is a replacement barrel, as I can see from the difference in tone between the two parts. I am not overly familiar with the Model E that you mention, except to recall vaguely that some of them were made under contract by Savage and Winchester.

    tac


  • Registered Users Posts: 5,504 ✭✭✭tac foley


    Whatever else it might be, I see no evidence of it being a BSA. BSA firearms are clearly stamped with the words 'BIRMINGHAM SMALL ARMS' on the left side of the action, and have the usual 'piled arms' [that's three Martini-Henry rifles joined together at the muzzle] stamped on the action ring.

    Does your rifle have the 'not English make' stamp on it the barrel and action? That alone would date it between 1946 and 1954.

    tac


  • Registered Users Posts: 286 ✭✭Mr.Flibble


    tac foley wrote: »
    Mr Flibble - I've just had a look on mrs tac's laptop, which is western and I can actually see the images a bit smaller, but I'd like to see the bolt side before I go any further with and identification.

    The calibre marking is for the .30-06 Springfield, as is the chambering, but the bullet weight of 220gr is that of the original .30-03 Government calibre - a long obsolete and short-lived offering that saw use in an underlever action as well as the military rifle that took over from the .3o-40 Krag-Jorgenson.

    The barrel is a replacement barrel, as I can see from the difference in tone between the two parts. I am not overly familiar with the Model E that you mention, except to recall vaguely that some of them were made under contract by Savage and Winchester.

    tac

    I'd never heard of the "Model E" either. I just came across it when googling the Model 1923 to see if that's what Tawny's rifle was - which, by the way, I don't think it is. Quite apart from the details it looks much more fifties than twenties.

    I understand it's possible the usual BSA logo wasn't used, and the marking, such as it is, may be on the top of one of the receiver rings, where it would currently be obscured by the scope blocks.

    Likewise, regarding the metal colouring, it may well be that the receiver has been heavily refinished. Nevertheless I agree with you that it has been rebarrelled.

    I've no idea why they would mark the rifle for a 220 grain load. Maybe there was some application they had in mind that called for a heavy bullet, or maybe the Proof House thought it would be smart to proof with a weight at the heavier end of what the user was likely to use. On the other hand, it's my impression that 41 grains of propellant, if of a suitable type for ordinary use, would be on the mild side(?)


  • Registered Users Posts: 5,504 ✭✭✭tac foley


    Right now, albeit with the view on mrs tac's device, I don't see ANYTHING that makes it a BSA ANYTHING. Where are the usual profusion of BSA stamps on the receiver? And no, the receiver has not been refinished, that is the plum colour of military heat treatment, clearly visible on some of my Luger pistols.

    The load is not just mild, but anemic in the extreme, and bears no relationship to the usual 30-06 loadings. In fact, looking through my reloading books I see NO loads of any kind BELOW 47gr of IMR4831, and that is for a 250gr Barnes SP bullet. It is NOT any kind of commercial loading either. The usual load for a 220 gr SP bullet is 50.5 gr of IMR 4350. Oddly enough, the lighter the bullet, the more powder of a given type is required to get it to the same velocities as its heavier brethren - a 100gr bullet needs almost 60gr of the suitable propellant.

    Commercial loading of the more common 180gr SP bullet is 48.5 gr of IMR 4320 or 57gr of IMR 4831.

    Right now, I strongly believe that I'm, looking at a model '03 action Springfield that somehow escaped the upgrade.

    It might have originally come over to UK as part of the Lend-Lease emergency weapons supply, ending up as surplus at the end of the war and not having been used except by the Home Guard - who knows? The serial number might reveal all, as will a single glimpse of the bolt.

    I agree with you about the date - fifties gives it that look. The stock is very reminiscent of the products of two commercial mass-producers of stocks in the USA, Reinhardt Fajen and Bishop, both of whom were widely used in this England by BSA and Parker-Hale. The flamboyant multi-curved outlines with their sharply-formed roll-over cheekpieces, pistol grips and spiffy-looking buttpads are typical of their day, and a welcome change in post-war UK and elsewhere to the straightline austerity we see on the lovely Browning up the page.

    tac


  • Registered Users Posts: 5,504 ✭✭✭tac foley


    Tawny Owl wrote: »
    More photos.

    20150517_154320.jpg (3.90 MB, 15 views)


    This clearly shows the eagle head inspection mark of the Springfield Arsenal.

    So how can this be a BSA?

    tac


  • Registered Users Posts: 286 ✭✭Mr.Flibble


    tac foley wrote: »
    Right now, I strongly believe that I'm, looking at a model '03 action Springfield that somehow escaped the upgrade.

    Are you sure? Have a look at the bolt release. It appears to me to be exactly like the P14 / M17 and not at all like the 03 Springfield.


  • Registered Users Posts: 286 ✭✭Mr.Flibble


    tac foley wrote: »
    20150517_154320.jpg (3.90 MB, 15 views)


    This clearly shows the eagle head inspection mark of the Springfield Arsenal.

    So how can this be a BSA?

    tac


    Lend-lease rifle converted by BSA after 1945?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 5,504 ✭✭✭tac foley


    Looks like it to me. But why BSA? BSA did not convert rifles, but Parker-Hale certainly did, by the tens of thousands.

    The stamp that I identified totally filled my screen from one side to the other, so I have missed out on the bolt stop bit. Can YOU repost it so I can see it?

    BTW, the action does look like a P14/M1917 to me, with the sight protecting 'ears' milled off. :) The circular feature on the bolt take-down latch fills my 27" screen....makes things a mite difficult to judge.

    Parker-Hale used to refurbish these rifles that had already been converted to .303 [if you remember the Americans made a few hundred thousand in .303 just for the Brits] for the military match competitions held by the NRA at Bisley every year. They 'accurised' them for a small extra cost using a process they called 'ball-burnishing' that consisted of forcing a very slightly oversized tungsten carbide ball down the barrel to smooth out the machining imperfections. The words 'Ball-burnished P-H] were stamped around the crown to show it had been done. They cost, in 1957, the princely sum of £15.19.6 or £17.19.6 with a BB barrel. The non-converted rifles had been used by the Home Guard during the war, and had a broad red stripe around the forend and butt-end of the stock denoting the different calibre.

    tac


Advertisement