[dusf]

Originally Posted by Yamanoto

Perhaps the other neg was justified, but the common consensus with regard to this one appears to be at odds with your interpretation.

Considering your grasp on arithmetic earlier when you mistakenly, or perhaps intentionally claimed the majority of the sellers negative comments were about his not being in the UK rather than his pedalling of counterfeit goods, I am not sure how much weight I would give your claim regarding the common consensus.

Originally Posted by Yamanoto

Given the correspondence you chose to publish, neither you nor the seller covered yourselves in glory tbh.

I published all correspondence up until the time of posting.

Everything I said about the seller was accurate, correct, and true, and what on earth has a transaction via eBay got to do with glory...

[Yamanoto]

Originally Posted by jor el

As it stands, you don't know for certain that he was selling counterfeit products, or where they would be posted from. You're basing your feedback on other feedback comments, which may or may not themselves be accurate. Either way, your feedback should have been based on your actual experience (you bought, cancelled and got an immediate refund), and not on what you think could have happened.

That's the absolute essence of it.

[dusf]

Originally Posted by Yamanoto

That's the absolute essence of it.

And I have answered that comment and pointed out where it is incorrect, I am not going to do it a second time just for you, please read my replies rather than recycling other people's posts.

[jor el]

The circles this thread is going in are pointless. Since you don't seem to want anything from this thread it is best closed.