Boards.ie

dar83 · 07-07-2012, 21:01

237bhp for the ST.

Not that impressed. Methinks a new intercooler is in order!

Drummerboy08 · 08-07-2012, 03:25

Intercooler problems held me back also, hoping to get this sorted soon.

God only knows what I'll drive on ATWR though..

Gary ITR · 08-07-2012, 20:32

My puny 1.6 4pot n/a made 168

There was a dip in my mid range so I went back on the rollers at the end and got joe to map it out of it

draffodx · 09-07-2012, 11:19

Quote:

Originally Posted by dar83

237bhp for the ST.

Not that impressed. Methinks a new intercooler is in order!

Is that with or without a remap?

dar83 · 09-07-2012, 16:25

Running DSCi.

I think there were a few factors in the low result, heatsoak being the main one, the car was reading the air temp as being 27 degrees!
I only put that map on it the day before as well, and never pulled the KAM fuse, so it definitely wasn't bedded in properly.

Ah well, ya live and learn (and buy things to help

)

mik_da_man · 09-07-2012, 18:54

The main factor would be the map not bedding in..Imo.
And if it's reporting 27 deg intake on the tiny intercooler it would lead to a low result.

Pity

dar83 · 09-07-2012, 19:43

Yeah that's the conclusion I've drawn as well. Tis a shame, I should have left the Perf+ map on it, I looked up the graph for that on a standard ST and its more impressive than the DSCi one.

Ya live and learn though and sure it wasn't an absolutely terrible performance, just down 15-20bhp (if my car ain't fcuked in some way or another, haha) on what it could be on a cooler day. Joe seemed to be happy enough by the graph that there's nothing obviously wrong, it just didn't do as well as they can.

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version Email this Page	Search this Thread: Advanced Search

07-07-2012, 21:01	#76
dar83 Registered User Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: Dublin Posts: 3,424 Adverts \| Friends	237bhp for the ST. Not that impressed. Methinks a new intercooler is in order!

08-07-2012, 03:25	#77
Drummerboy08 Registered User Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: Dundrum/Wexford Posts: 9,362 Adverts \| Friends	Intercooler problems held me back also, hoping to get this sorted soon. God only knows what I'll drive on ATWR though..

08-07-2012, 20:32	#78
Gary ITR Hosted Moderator Join Date: Sep 2005 Posts: 17,665 Adverts \| Friends HMod: OTG	My puny 1.6 4pot n/a made 168 There was a dip in my mid range so I went back on the rollers at the end and got joe to map it out of it

09-07-2012, 16:25	#80
dar83 Registered User Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: Dublin Posts: 3,424 Adverts \| Friends	Running DSCi. I think there were a few factors in the low result, heatsoak being the main one, the car was reading the air temp as being 27 degrees! I only put that map on it the day before as well, and never pulled the KAM fuse, so it definitely wasn't bedded in properly. Ah well, ya live and learn (and buy things to help )

09-07-2012, 18:54	#81
mik_da_man Registered User Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: Dublin / Meath / Cork Posts: 4,890 Adverts \| Friends	The main factor would be the map not bedding in..Imo. And if it's reporting 27 deg intake on the tiny intercooler it would lead to a low result. Pity

09-07-2012, 19:43	#82
dar83 Registered User Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: Dublin Posts: 3,424 Adverts \| Friends	Yeah that's the conclusion I've drawn as well. Tis a shame, I should have left the Perf+ map on it, I looked up the graph for that on a standard ST and its more impressive than the DSCi one. Ya live and learn though and sure it wasn't an absolutely terrible performance, just down 15-20bhp (if my car ain't fcuked in some way or another, haha) on what it could be on a cooler day. Joe seemed to be happy enough by the graph that there's nothing obviously wrong, it just didn't do as well as they can.