Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all,
Vanilla are planning an update to the site on April 24th (next Wednesday). It is a major PHP8 update which is expected to boost performance across the site. The site will be down from 7pm and it is expected to take about an hour to complete. We appreciate your patience during the update.
Thanks all.

Only solution is for Ireland to leave the euro

  • 14-02-2010 3:14pm
    #1
    Registered Users Posts: 1,478 ✭✭✭


    Leaving the euro is the only way we will emerge from recession for the following related reasons IMO:

    a) there is too much opposition from the unions to sufficiently reduce our general wage levels
    b) inward investment will continue to fall due to high cost of doing business here resulting in increased unemployment
    c) domestic demand will remain low due to high personal debt and unemployment preventing any kind of domestic driven recovery
    d) export driven recovery won't happen because our costs are too high resulting in the price of our produce being uncompetitive on international markets.
    e) unemployment will worsen our fiscal position preventing Ireland (due to pressure from lenders for Ireland to balance the books) from stimulating the economy through increased spending
    f) higher interest rates in Euroland will be a barrier to a recovery in Ireland since we will be one of the last to emerge (if we ever do).

    It's a vicious circle that is almost impossible to extract oneself. The solution is to leave the euro imo - consequences are:
    a) Immediate reduction in cost of doing business here resulting in increased inward investment.
    b) Cost of exports are immediately lower resulting in increased demand on international markets for Irish produce facilitating an export driven recovery.
    c) Cost of imports will be too high favouring domestic producers thereby boosting employment in Irish companies facilitating a domestic driven recovery
    d) We will be able to keep interest rates low until we've properly recovered.
    e) Should solve the public versue private sector debate though we still need to make the public service more efficient


    Problem with this approach is our (Ireland's and our personal) debt is denominated in euro leading most likely to default. Euro personal debt would have to be redenominated in Irish punts at a rate that is consisent with current euro debt / euro earning ratio. Lenders inevitably would have to take a hit on the fx.

    The above approach is similar to what is recommended for Latvia and what happened in Argentina in 2001 - see link below. Latvia continues to peg its currency to the euro while Argentina pegged its currency to the dollar until it was forced to devalue. It was only when Argentina devalued that it emerged from recession.

    http://www.cepr.net/documents/publications/latvia-recession-2010-02.pdf

    Any views?


«1345678

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 2,219 ✭✭✭Nate--IRL--


    You haven't addressed Capital Flight. How would you deal with that? And what about future funding after default?

    Nate


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,376 ✭✭✭ei.sdraob


    yes lets default that would magically solve all our problems :D and make us all richer

    (ignoring for momemnt that most of our debt will remain in euro, and money will pour out faster than you can say "euro")

    whatcouldpossiblygowrong


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,478 ✭✭✭kaymin


    You haven't addressed Capital Flight. How would you deal with that? And what about future funding after default?

    Nate

    If it was done as of a point in time without discussion / speculation then it's too late for capital flight.

    Yes, no doubt there would be problems sourcing funding in the aftermath, however, Argentina have succeeded in raising funds - investors will always invest if the risk to return ratio is right. No doubt interest rates would have to be high until things stabilised, however, this would be a price worth paying if it meant more jobs for Irish people imo.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,478 ✭✭✭kaymin


    ei.sdraob wrote: »
    yes lets default that would magically solve all our problems :D and make us all richer

    (ignoring for momemnt that most of our debt will remain in euro, and money will pour out faster than you can say "euro")

    whatcouldpossiblygowrong

    It won't make us richer since our spending power abroad will be much reduced. It will make us more competitive though.

    Yes our debt is in euro but if Ireland defaults (by insisting on the debt being redenominated in Irish punt) then it will be manageable.


  • Registered Users Posts: 7,639 ✭✭✭PeakOutput


    laughable idea


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 788 ✭✭✭eoinbn


    kaymin wrote: »
    It's a vicious circle that is almost impossible to extract oneself. The solution is to leave the euro imo - consequences are:
    a) Immediate reduction in cost of doing business here resulting in increased inward investment.
    b) Cost of exports are immediately lower resulting in increased demand on international markets for Irish produce facilitating an export driven recovery.
    c) Cost of imports will be too high favouring domestic producers thereby boosting employment in Irish companies facilitating a domestic driven recovery
    d) We will be able to keep interest rates low until we've properly recovered.
    e) Should solve the public versue private sector debate though we still need to make the public service more efficient

    a) Investment won't pick up until worldwide demands picks up.
    b) Our exports become more competitive, true. However devaluing is similar to wage cuts, so what would stop an all out strike by unions?
    c) So we will start buying Irish made cars, electronics, clothes etc? Over the last 10 years Ireland made drugs, houses and food. Devaluing will make home grown foods more viable, but that's about it. Fossil fuels will skyrocket in price increasing energy and heating costs.
    d) If we keep interest rates low it means that saving rates will be low. If savings are low then the banks can't lend. If they borrow from international markets they will have to pay international rates(i.e higher rates) and they will be forced to increase the interest rates. Strong economies are built on HIGH increase rates and high saving rates- e.g Japan '45-80's. Within 5 years of lowering interesting rates they had ruined a lot of what they had done over the previous 40 years.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,478 ✭✭✭kaymin


    eoinbn wrote: »
    a) Investment won't pick up until worldwide demands picks up.
    b) Our exports become more competitive, true. However devaluing is similar to wage cuts, so what would stop an all out strike by unions?
    c) So we will start buying Irish made cars, electronics, clothes etc? Over the last 10 years Ireland made drugs, houses and food. Devaluing will make home grown foods more viable, but that's about it. Fossil fuels will skyrocket in price increasing energy and heating costs.
    d) If we keep interest rates low it means that saving rates will be low. If savings are low then the banks can't lend. If they borrow from international markets they will have to pay international rates(i.e higher rates) and they will be forced to increase the interest rates. Strong economies are built on HIGH increase rates and high saving rates- e.g Japan '45-80's. Within 5 years of lowering interesting rates they had ruined a lot of what they had done over the previous 40 years.


    a) If Ireland has a lower cost punt denominated economy then it should experience more inward investment compared to its higher cost euro denominated economy. There is investment available albeit at a much lower level compared to when the world economy was working properly.
    b) The main reason for the unions to strike is their view that the burden is not being shared equally - they wouldn't be able to use this argument anymore at least.
    c) Yes there would be pain but it would be worth it imo.
    d) Saving rates are currently at record high levels despite very low interest rates.


  • Registered Users Posts: 18,381 ✭✭✭✭kippy


    Leaving the Euro is about as laughable as the taxpayers buying up all the bad debt from the banks at little or no advantage to the taxpayer....oh wait...

    Seriously, leaving the Euro is not a viable option.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,376 ✭✭✭ei.sdraob


    kaymin wrote: »
    It won't make us richer since our spending power abroad will be much reduced. It will make us more competitive though.

    making us much poorer overnight, and making everyone poorer equally, im afraid there wont be any industries left after the shock that will able compete...

    kaymin wrote: »
    Yes our debt is in euro but if Ireland defaults (by insisting on the debt being redenominated in Irish punt) then it will be manageable.

    go ahead and insist that the "debt being redenominated in Irish punt" good luck then trying to raise another 20 odd billion euro to run the governments gravy train, no one in right mind would lend the country money after such default


    anyways this topic was discussed to death before, of all the daft ideas this will accomplish least and cause much damage as the negatives would outweigh the positives


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,478 ✭✭✭kaymin


    kippy wrote: »
    Leaving the Euro is about as laughable as the taxpayers buying up all the bad debt from the banks at little or no advantage to the taxpayer....oh wait...

    Seriously, leaving the Euro is not a viable option.

    I'm against NAMA but I'm curious to know why leaving the euro is not a viable option.

    In fact it may be forced upon us if the issues with Greece spread to the larger economies. I can't see the prudent German and French taxpayers wanting to pay for the actions of other nations.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 1,478 ✭✭✭kaymin


    ei.sdraob wrote: »
    making us much poorer overnight, and making everyone poorer equally, im afraid there wont be any industries left after the shock that will able compete...




    go ahead and insist that the "debt being redenominated in Irish punt" good luck then trying to raise another 20 odd billion euro to run the governments gravy train, no one in right mind would lend the country money after such default


    anyways this topic was discussed to death before, of all the daft ideas this will accomplish least and cause much damage as the negatives would outweigh the positives

    Why won't there be any industries left?

    Yes, we still need to sort out the public service - at least the government would have no option but to take the necessary action.

    Accomplish least? - we become competitive again overnight - isn't that what the everybody is trying to achieve at the moment (but not successfully).


  • Registered Users Posts: 17,838 ✭✭✭✭silverharp


    meanwhile everyone's mortgages will go back up to 7% or 8% overnight and or everyone will still owe Euros while their salaries depreciate by 30%

    A belief in gender identity involves a level of faith as there is nothing tangible to prove its existence which, as something divorced from the physical body, is similar to the idea of a soul. - Colette Colfer



  • Registered Users Posts: 7,639 ✭✭✭PeakOutput


    kaymin wrote: »
    Accomplish least? - we become competitive again overnight - isn't that what the everybody is trying to achieve at the moment (but not successfully).

    no they are trying to save the country which being competitive is part of

    if you want to live in an icelandic like economy just move to iceland but i dont so leave my country alone please


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,478 ✭✭✭kaymin


    meanwhile everyone's mortgages will go back up to 7% or 8% overnight and or everyone will still owe Euros while their salaries depreciate by 30%

    I acknowledged this when i included the following in my original post:
    Problem with this approach is our (Ireland's and our personal) debt is denominated in euro leading most likely to default. Euro personal debt would have to be redenominated in Irish punts at a rate that is consisent with current euro debt / euro earning ratio. Lenders inevitably would have to take a hit on the fx.

    But at least people will have jobs and earnings with which they can pay the 7 or 8 % interest rates. House prices might even fall to reasonable levels.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 10,012 ✭✭✭✭thebman


    We can't leave the euro for many reasons.

    It is one of the few things going for us at this point. Does anybody believe that we would raise the necessary bonds required to cover expenditure if we left the Euro.

    We are seen as a basket case, leaving the euro would leave us isolated and exposed to the market reality.

    Devaluation isn't a solution, fixing the problems is the solution. Its the harder way to do it but there is no quick fix for our problems as they are sizable and have built up since about 2004 so we should just take the time and pain to solve them and ensure they don't happen again.

    Even if leaving the euro and printing money would fix the problem, we would not learn anything so it would only fix it temporarily until we all end up back here and wanting to devalue again.

    No lets go look at ourselves and form a sustainable economy.


  • Registered Users Posts: 7,639 ✭✭✭PeakOutput


    kaymin wrote: »
    I acknowledged this when i included the following in my original post:
    Problem with this approach is our (Ireland's and our personal) debt is denominated in euro leading most likely to default. Euro personal debt would have to be redenominated in Irish punts at a rate that is consisent with current euro debt / euro earning ratio. Lenders inevitably would have to take a hit on the fx.

    But at least people will have jobs and earnings with which they can pay the 7 or 8 % interest rates. House prices might even fall to reasonable levels.

    are you absolutely taking the piss?

    inflation would be massive because our banks would fail overnight and the goverment would have to print money constantly sure we would be competitive for foreign investment because we would turn into a 3rd world country overnight and we would be paid a salary appropriate with that position

    domestic produce would still be relatively affordable but forget about imports but sure they arent that important, people dont usually need fruit or cars or oil

    the only reason we are not a completely destroyed economy is the euro and the eu and central control over our currency

    there is another way to get competitive.........lower the minimum wage


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,478 ✭✭✭kaymin


    thebman wrote: »
    We can't leave the euro for many reasons.

    It is one of the few things going for us at this point. Does anybody believe that we would raise the necessary bonds required to cover expenditure if we left the Euro.

    We are seen as a basket case, leaving the euro would leave us isolated and exposed to the market reality.

    Devaluation isn't a solution, fixing the problems is the solution. Its the harder way to do it but there is no quick fix for our problems as they are sizable and have built up since about 2004 so we should just take the time and pain to solve them and ensure they don't happen again.

    Even if leaving the euro and printing money would fix the problem, we would not learn anything so it would only fix it temporarily until we all end up back here and wanting to devalue again.

    No lets go look at ourselves and form a sustainable economy.

    Having the ability to borrow is worsening our position. At least if we weren't able to borrow then the government would have to take the necessary action. I think its only a matter of time before investors stop lending to us anyway.

    I'm not suggesting we print money. And I think we'll face market reality whether we stay in the euro or not.

    Our economy will only become sustainable if it becomes competitive. I just don't see this happening the way things are going. History has given very few examples of economies that improved their competitiveness to the extent we need without a devaluation.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,478 ✭✭✭kaymin


    PeakOutput wrote: »
    are you absolutely taking the piss?

    inflation would be massive because our banks would fail overnight and the goverment would have to print money constantly sure we would be competitive for foreign investment because we would turn into a 3rd world country overnight and we would be paid a salary appropriate with that position

    domestic produce would still be relatively affordable but forget about imports but sure they arent that important, people dont usually need fruit or cars or oil

    the only reason we are not a completely destroyed economy is the euro and the eu and central control over our currency

    there is another way to get competitive.........lower the minimum wage

    eh, no I'm not taking the piss. It's a discussion on a topic with positives and negatives.

    Haven't our banks already failed?

    Yes imports become less affordable or perhaps not affordable at all. But sure that's how it is for most of the unemployed.

    Ireland has resources - we can grow vegetables and fruit in Ireland. And we have huge gas resources off Mayo.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,376 ✭✭✭ei.sdraob


    kaymin wrote: »
    Having the ability to borrow is worsening our position

    not having the ability to borrow would mean kissing goodbye to welfare and public services

    however much i think these two expenditures are "overweight"
    what your proposing would bring the country to its knees altogether
    kaymin wrote:
    Why won't there be any industries left?

    see the part above about society collapsing due to not being able to pay welfare and public service altogether, no public service > no industry
    however much one might not like the public service for being wasteful we do need them
    kaymin wrote:
    Yes, we still need to sort out the public service - at least the government would have no option but to take the necessary action.

    and were doing that now, what you propose is akin to taking the floor from underneath the economy and hoping it somehow survives the fall and rebounds
    kaymin wrote:
    Accomplish least? - we become competitive again overnight - isn't that what the everybody is trying to achieve at the moment (but not successfully).
    the Chinese are very competitive now by keeping their people poor via currency manipulation, do you want to be in that position?

    we currently have a dirty room in the house, instead of cleaning the room what you want to do is burn the house down to the ground


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 10,012 ✭✭✭✭thebman


    kaymin wrote: »
    Having the ability to borrow is worsening our position. At least if we weren't able to borrow then the government would have to take the necessary action. I think its only a matter of time before investors stop lending to us anyway.

    I don't really think it is. Despite all the bad talk, we are moving in the right direction and as long as we are moving in the right direction, investors will invest.

    Leaving the Euro would be the equivalent of Toyota saying we are going to stop making cars under the name Toyota and start doing it under Oyota because of recent problems with our public image and this recalls. Who wants to invest in Oyota, we promise we won't make dodgy cars again?

    I don't think it would fool anybody. It just makes it look like you have no intention of fixing the problems or moving in the right direction and want to just go back to where you were and do the same thing again.
    Our economy will only become sustainable if it becomes competitive. I just don't see this happening the way things are going. History has given very few examples of economies that improved their competitiveness to the extent we need without a devaluation.

    How many countries have previously been in a position where devaluation was impossible? Governments will always take the way out that will leave them with most votes from their people.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 1,033 ✭✭✭Winty


    Why dont we join Sterling?


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,478 ✭✭✭kaymin


    ei.sdraob wrote: »
    not having the ability to borrow would mean kissing goodbye to welfare and public services

    however much i think these two expenditures are "overweight"
    what your proposing would bring the country to its knees altogether



    see the part above about society collapsing due to not being able to pay welfare and public service altogether, no public service > no industry
    however much one might not like the public service for being wasteful we do need them



    and were doing that now, what you propose is akin to taking the floor from underneath the economy and hoping it somehow survives the fall and rebounds


    the Chinese are very competitive now by keeping their people poor via currency manipulation, do you want to be in that position?

    we currently have a dirty room in the house, instead of cleaning the room what you want to do is burn the house down to the ground

    Who said anything about having no public service? It needs to be reformed and made efficient. The IMF have slashed numbers and wage levels in the public service in Latvia - we can do likewise.

    What I'm proposing gives the economy something to work with. We're fighting a losing battle at the moment due to our lack of competitiveness.

    The Chinese government is protecting jobs in China. The rights and wrongs of this is a different argument. The Irish punt would be floating, the Chinese renminbi doesn't float freely.

    If we could 'clean the room' as you put it, fine, but I don't think we're capable. Time will tell.


  • Registered Users Posts: 7,639 ✭✭✭PeakOutput


    kaymin wrote: »
    positives and negatives.

    there are no positives when its all balanced out. any perceived positive is greatly outweighed and turned into a negative overall when put against the destruction to the country this would cause
    Haven't our banks already failed?

    no, they almost did but because of support from the ecb the goverment has been able to salvage them.
    Yes imports become less affordable or perhaps not affordable at all. But sure that's how it is for most of the unemployed.

    ah ok so because the unemployed cant afford some things nobody else in the country should be able to? that makes a hole load of sense
    Ireland has resources - we can grow vegetables and fruit in Ireland.

    sure we can but we wont be able to afford to IMPORT the necessary equipment required to grow oranges and bannanas and everything else that wont grow naturally in our enviroment and even we could the cost would be two much for our new poverty stricken workforce anyway so we would be left with what? beef pork and potatoes again......great
    And we have huge gas resources off Mayo.

    that will now be worth far far less because we cease to be in a position of power at the negotiating table because everyone and their mother will know that they are vital to our survival


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,376 ✭✭✭ei.sdraob


    Winty wrote: »
    Why dont we join Sterling?
    been there done that
    kaymin wrote: »
    Who said anything about having no public service?
    we have a 25billion hole in our finances as i demonstrated in recent thread, by defaulting no one will loan Ireland that sort of money
    kaymin wrote: »
    It needs to be reformed and made efficient. The IMF have slashed civil service numbers and wage levels in the public service in Latvia - we can do likewise.
    .
    thats whats happening now, slowly but surely
    kaymin wrote: »
    What I'm proposing gives the economy something to work with.
    .
    there wont be an economy left if we default and devalue, you'll be dragging down and killing healthy companies
    kaymin wrote: »
    We're fighting a losing battle at the moment due to our lack of competitiveness.
    .
    which has little to do with the currency of exchange

    kaymin wrote: »
    The Chinese government is protecting jobs in China. The rights and wrongs of this is a different argument.
    The Chinese government is keeping a giant army of near slave labour poor, while the party leaders get to keep the profits from this giant sweatshop corporation, it will all end in tears

    kaymin wrote: »
    The Irish punt would be floating, the Chinese reminbi doesn't float freely.
    how is that different from now?

    ignoring for a moment that an Irish punt would be sinking not floating...
    kaymin wrote: »
    If we could 'clean the room' as you put it, fine, but I don't think we're capable. Time will tell.
    the least we can do is try


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 10,012 ✭✭✭✭thebman


    The other thing is that any successful person with the ability to leave the country will leave if we leave the Euro as they know currency devaluation is coming and won't want to be part of it.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,478 ✭✭✭kaymin


    PeakOutput wrote: »
    no, they almost did but because of support from the ecb the goverment has been able to salvage them.

    Splitting hairs. They've failed in my view.

    PeakOutput wrote: »
    ah ok so because the unemployed cant afford some things nobody else in the country should be able to? that makes a hole load of sense

    Considering the unemployed comprise an increasing proportion of the population and the government is acting on behalf of the entire population, yes I think it makes sense.

    PeakOutput wrote: »
    sure we can but we wont be able to afford to IMPORT the necessary equipment required to grow oranges and bannanas and everything else that wont grow naturally in our enviroment and even we could the cost would be two much for our new poverty stricken workforce anyway so we would be left with what? beef pork and potatoes again......great

    I remember eating bananas and oranges in the days of the punt.
    PeakOutput wrote: »
    that will now be worth far far less because we cease to be in a position of power at the negotiating table because everyone and their mother will know that they are vital to our survival

    A contract has been signed with Shell so this argument is probably redundant but do you really think Uganda was taken advantage of in their negotiations with Tullow Oil / CNOOC and the other oil companies. I think they hammered out a good deal despite these reserves being vital to the future of their economy.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,478 ✭✭✭kaymin


    thebman wrote: »
    The other thing is that any successful person with the ability to leave the country will leave if we leave the Euro as they know currency devaluation is coming and won't want to be part of it.

    Currency devaluation / leaving the euro is not something that you announce in advance.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 10,012 ✭✭✭✭thebman


    kaymin wrote: »
    Currency devaluation / leaving the euro is not something that you announce in advance.

    Yes it is. It takes time to do a currency swap over by starting it you have announced it and the next day, everyone starts moving that can.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,815 ✭✭✭imitation


    Leaving the euro is a foolish idea, for all the reasons stated above, our loans would be in euros, currency valuation would plummet from day one. It would be an economic Armageddon. Anybody with any sense would withdraw there money in euros, if they couldnt there would be riots.


    Most of all though, its a stupid short sighted idea, the euro worked fantastically for us in the good times, now that its bad in one single recession we should dump it ? This isnt the great depression, people arent staving on masse in the streets, there is no call for it. Leaving it would basicly be leaving the EU and would drive off every MNC in the country. Holding tough is the sensible choice.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 1,478 ✭✭✭kaymin


    ei.sdraob wrote: »
    which has little to do with the currency of exchange

    Well it does really since the cost of imports need to be translated into our local currency and the cost of our exports have to be translated into the local currencies of our export markets. Price differences for the most part will determine whose product is bought.
    ei.sdraob wrote: »
    how is that different from now?

    ignoring for a moment that an Irish punt would be sinking not floating...

    It's not different. I was responding to your comment which suggested I favoured currency manipulation similar to what the Chinese do.


Advertisement