Boards.ie uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more x
Post Reply  
 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
07-05-2012, 19:08   #16
Cork boy 55
Registered User
 
Cork boy 55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Dublin City
Posts: 1,374
What you save using such a thing for launch from Earth is cheap propellant, at the expense of complex infrastructure (including a rail and launching sled capable of carrying an orbital rocket and power systems for running them) and a more complicated vehicle. What makes spaceflight expensive isn't propellant cost, but costs of operating the infrastructure, setting up the vehicle, etc. Adding infrastructure and complexity to save propellant isn't the best approach to making spaceflight cheaper.

On the moon, though, it makes a lot more sense. Maglev technology could reach a sizable fraction of lunar orbital velocity without much trouble. And you can take some shortcuts with low gravity and no atmosphere to worry about...rather than have a long linear track that you dump a huge pulse of power into accelerating the payload along and high speed linear motors to accelerate the payload, have an unpowered circular track that's just passive maglev, or even just rail. Tether the craft to a central motorized rotor, boost it onto the track at enough speed to keep it levitated, and accelerate it with the tether until it's up to the desired velocity. Release when it's going in the desired direction.

http://www.bautforum.com/showthread....-rockets/page5
Cork boy 55 is offline  
Advertisement
07-05-2012, 19:14   #17
Doc Ruby
Registered User
 
Doc Ruby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Nancy's harbour cafe
Posts: 3,653
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cork boy 55 View Post
What you save using such a thing for launch from Earth is cheap propellant, at the expense of complex infrastructure (including a rail and launching sled capable of carrying an orbital rocket and power systems for running them) and a more complicated vehicle. What makes spaceflight expensive isn't propellant cost, but costs of operating the infrastructure, setting up the vehicle, etc. Adding infrastructure and complexity to save propellant isn't the best approach to making spaceflight cheaper.

On the moon, though, it makes a lot more sense. Maglev technology could reach a sizable fraction of lunar orbital velocity without much trouble. And you can take some shortcuts with low gravity and no atmosphere to worry about...rather than have a long linear track that you dump a huge pulse of power into accelerating the payload along and high speed linear motors to accelerate the payload, have an unpowered circular track that's just passive maglev, or even just rail. Tether the craft to a central motorized rotor, boost it onto the track at enough speed to keep it levitated, and accelerate it with the tether until it's up to the desired velocity. Release when it's going in the desired direction.

http://www.bautforum.com/showthread....-rockets/page5
0.004 of current launch costs to orbit.

That is all.
Doc Ruby is offline  
Post Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Remove Text Formatting
Bold
Italic
Underline

Insert Image
Wrap [QUOTE] tags around selected text
 
Decrease Size
Increase Size
Please sign up or log in to join the discussion

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search