Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all,
Vanilla are planning an update to the site on April 24th (next Wednesday). It is a major PHP8 update which is expected to boost performance across the site. The site will be down from 7pm and it is expected to take about an hour to complete. We appreciate your patience during the update.
Thanks all.

Cold Fusion Heats Up: Rossi granted a patent by the U.S. Patent Office.

Options
  • 29-08-2015 9:54am
    #1
    celtic_oz
    Registered Users Posts: 1,548 ✭✭✭


    Huffington Post here
    "Perhaps the most startling (and most controversial) report is by an Italian-American engineer-entrepreneur named Andrea Rossi. Rossi claims that he has developed a tabletop reactor that produces heat by an as-yet-not-fully-understood LENR process.

    Rossi has gone well beyond laboratory demonstration; he claims that he and the private firm Industrial Heat, LLC of Raleigh, North Carolina, USA, have actually installed a working system at an (undisclosed) commercial customer's site.

    detail-868x605.jpg

    According to Rossi and a handful of others who have observed the system in operation, it is producing 1 MWatt continuous net output power, in the form of heat, from a few grams of "fuel" in each of a set of modest-sized reactors in a network. The system has now been operating for approximately six months, as part of a one-year acceptance test. Rossi and IH LLC are in talks with Chinese firms for large-scale commercial manufacture.

    Several "reliable sources" have visited Rossi's commercial site, and have verified that the system is working as claimed, as evidenced, for example, by the customer's significantly reduced electric bills.

    However, a few details have now come to light. For example, Rossi was just granted a patent by the U.S. Patent Office. The patent includes some heretofore unknown details, such as the contents of the "fuel" in Rossi's reactors: it is a powder of 50% nickel, 20% lithium and 30% lithium aluminum hydride."

    Some Q&A with Rossi here

    Some dubious oil price analysis here

    Context here


Comments

  • Options
    #2
    nyarlothothep
    Registered Users Posts: 5,176 ✭✭✭nyarlothothep


    A cursory glance seems to reveal that Rossi has made these claims before and he's not sharing the details of his discovery, it looks like he hasn't tapped cold fusion. I would be pessimistic about it.


  • Options
    #3
    celtic_oz
    Registered Users Posts: 1,548 ✭✭✭celtic_oz


    fulvio2.jpg
    Rossi’s engineer: ‘I have seen things you people wouldn’t believe’
    “As a skeptic I started there, and in the beginning Rossi wouldn’t let me see any data. Gradually he gained confidence since I solved a few problems. And after some time I found myself with the truth in my hands, having made some calculations, and I was amazed. I made the same calculations twenty times and I tried to find the error, but there was no error.
    “Now after seeing everything that Rossi is doing, and the levels at which we have arrived, there really is no error, but already at that time he saw things that ordinary people were not yet able to see.
    ....
    “I have really seen… Did you see Blade Runner? The quote at the end, ‘I’ve seen things you people wouldn’t believe’. It’s true. I assure you that I have seen things that only I, Rossi and a few other people saw. We really saw things… I really saw the new frontier of energy.
    ....
    The game is getting too big to be handled only by Rossi and me in person. It’s something that will change the face of the Earth, so … I don’t know. Since I’m not involved in anything related to the business development or the technology development at the industrial level, and since I don’t have any deeper knowledge on the direction in which things are going, I prefer not to say too much about it.


    Full Interview


  • Options
    #4
    nyarlothothep
    Registered Users Posts: 5,176 ✭✭✭nyarlothothep


    This is interesting

    https://richarddawkins.net/2015/12/the-first-plasma-the-wendelstein-7-x-fusion-device-is-now-in-operation/


  • Options
    #5
    dr.fuzzenstein
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 16,635 ✭✭✭✭dr.fuzzenstein


    I'd put this in the same category as free energy. A lot of talk, but not a lot of actual physics. Wishy-washy, wishful thinking doesn't make for good science.


  • Options
    #6
    celtic_oz
    Registered Users Posts: 1,548 ✭✭✭celtic_oz


    https://aeon.co/essays/why-do-scientists-dismiss-the-possibility-of-cold-fusion
    This is not to deny that there is truth in the principle popularised by Carl Sagan, that extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. We should certainly be very cautious about such surprising claims, unless and until we amass a great deal of evidence. But this is not a good reason for ignoring such evidence in the first place, or refusing to contemplate the possibility that it might exist. (As Godes said recently: ‘It is sad that such people say that science should be driven by data and results, but at the same time refuse to look at the actual results.’)

    Again, there’s a sociological explanation why few people are willing to look at the evidence. They put their reputations at risk by doing so. Cold fusion is tainted, and the taint is contagious – anyone seen to take it seriously risks contamination. So the subject is stuck in a place that is largely inaccessible to reason – a reputation trap, we might call it. People outside the trap won’t go near it, for fear of falling in. ‘If there is something scientists fear, it is to become like pariahs,’ as Lundin puts it. People inside the trap are already regarded as disreputable, an attitude that trumps any efforts that they might make to argue their way out, by reason and evidence.


  • Advertisement
  • Options
    #7
    celtic_oz
    Registered Users Posts: 1,548 ✭✭✭celtic_oz


    BREAKING: The E-Cat has been replicated—here’s the recipe!

    The ‘open science’ group, Martin Fleischmann Memorial Project, MFMP, has announced that they have performed a true replication of the effect in Rossi’s energy device, the E-Cat. The group has also published a complete recipe of how to replicate the effect, adding a clear method for detecting a successful replication.

    screen-shot-2016-02-24-at-13-10-43.png
    During ICCF-17 in South Korea, shortly following the sad death of Dr. Martin Fleischmann, it became abundantly clear to a group of fresh attendees that the old approach to science, combined with the ostracisation of the great minds that had worked in the face of ridicule, was not delivering on the promise of of what we immediately called, “The New Fire”.
    .
    .
    Around the beginning of the month we saw what appeared to be up to a COP of 1.2, not earth shattering, but sustained and robust and in line with both observations by others and the Lugano report when adjusted for correct emissivity. Over the next weeks we tried various bookend calibrations which supported this finding.
    .
    .
    We are happy to tell you that we believe we have satisfied our condition 2, yet of course we’d like to replicate ourselves. Actually, though, it goes much further than that. What we will share is that the way in which we discovered it and the journey of analysis that makes it virtually impossible to say that Rossi does not have what he claims. It also shows that, whilst he may have been optimistic in how fast this would play out, he has been telling the truth, quite openly for years. Not only that, nature itself has been telling the same story and it told us too.

    Source


  • Options
    #8
    celtic_oz
    Registered Users Posts: 1,548 ✭✭✭celtic_oz


    BmhYeyZ.jpg


Advertisement