Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all,
Vanilla are planning an update to the site on April 24th (next Wednesday). It is a major PHP8 update which is expected to boost performance across the site. The site will be down from 7pm and it is expected to take about an hour to complete. We appreciate your patience during the update.
Thanks all.

Ireland u20 6 Nations & World Cup 2012

1356779

Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,632 ✭✭✭ormond lad


    profitius wrote: »
    Thats my thoughts too.

    I'm not in favour of playing 18 year olds in the U20s IF there are other, older options for the same position. These days theres loads of centers coming through.

    Farrell looks like he'll have a good career ahead of him. It should be interesting in Ulster with himself and Luke Marshall fighting for the 12 jersey.
    If they are good enough to play they play, so what if there is older players(who may not be a better player) ahead of them. if someone is barely 18 and they are better than someone who is a day under the u20 age group, play the better option.


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,976 ✭✭✭profitius


    ormond lad wrote: »
    If they are good enough to play they play, so what if there is older players(who may not be a better player) ahead of them. if someone is barely 18 and they are better than someone who is a day under the u20 age group, play the better option.

    And stop another player getting that experience.

    U20 rugby should be about player development mainly.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,632 ✭✭✭ormond lad


    profitius wrote: »
    And stop another player getting that experience.

    U20 rugby should be about player development mainly.
    If a player is good enough they start, even if they are a day u/age for u18 and the guy fighting for the same position is a day u/age for 20s.
    Whats the point of leaving the better player off if he's better than the player on the pitch. The only time your best xv is not on the field is if players are called up to the provincial squads for games during the 6 nations.
    Would new zealand or australia leave the older lad and leave the younger player who is better on the sideline because they are concerned about player development.
    If someone is good enough to start they start


  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 14,599 Mod ✭✭✭✭CIARAN_BOYLE


    ormond lad wrote: »
    If someone is good enough to start they start
    Also if someone isn't good enough to make the team on merits they probably won't make it as a professional rugby rugby player and are holding up the development of a younger option


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,883 ✭✭✭shuffol


    You should put your best XV out in the u-20s and try to wn the tournament, look at the players on the GS winning side in 07, how good was winning the GS for their development? We've a relatively small pool of players at u-20 level who look capable of playing pro rugby, if we send out understrength teams against the likes of France and England they'll be stuffed, thats hardly ideal for them.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 3,976 ✭✭✭profitius


    ormond lad wrote: »
    If a player is good enough they start, even if they are a day u/age for u18 and the guy fighting for the same position is a day u/age for 20s.
    Whats the point of leaving the better player off if he's better than the player on the pitch. The only time your best xv is not on the field is if players are called up to the provincial squads for games during the 6 nations.
    Would new zealand or australia leave the older lad and leave the younger player who is better on the sideline because they are concerned about player development.
    If someone is good enough to start they start

    We'll have to agree to disagree with this one, OL.

    I think underage rugby should be about development firstly. I've heard a few people talk about the schools having a win at all costs mentality instead of being interested in the development of players.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,632 ✭✭✭ormond lad


    profitius wrote: »
    We'll have to agree to disagree with this one, OL.

    I think underage rugby should be about development firstly. I've heard a few people talk about the schools having a win at all costs mentality instead of being interested in the development of players.
    But at u20s level, there is plenty of players in pro academys, on pro contracts and they are their to win. If you want to do well you need your u/age teams doing well and for that to happen you put your best 15 on the pitch
    U20s internationals are on an entirely different level to senior schools cups


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,883 ✭✭✭shuffol


    Reported from the Irish Times website, was on in Donnybrook yesterday.


    Ireland Under-20s 24 Ulster Ravens 23:

    IF ONE is to nitpick, and surely Ireland Under-20s coach Mike Ruddock will be doing just that, then the last quarter of this performance against an Ulster selection will come in for serious scrutiny.

    What is clear from the warm-up games over the past 10 days is Ireland will be competitive at this age grade level come the Six Nations. There is quality at both scrumhalf and outhalf in recent St Michael’s College rugby nursery graduates Cathal Marsh and Luke McGrath, while the backrow is teeming with muscular, classy operators.

    There were plenty of positives to glean from yesterday’s outing at a chilly Donnbyrook. Up to about the hour mark that is. Thereafter the Ulster pack upped the physical stakes and the Irish eight visibly struggled.

    They conceded a try off a lineout driving maul, which is just the type of assault the French (Grenoble on February 11th) and English (Adams Park on March 16th) will undoubtedly unleash. It was prop Conor Carey who flopped over the line.

    Then Conor Gaston profited from sloppy handling in midfield to kick on and be first to the bobbling ball. Stuart Olding’s conversion brought matters back to the minimum but time was up.

    The quality of Marsh and Sam Coghlan Murray was evident in their combination for the game’s opening try on 28 minutes. A solid scrum saw clean ball go to Marsh, who swerved to attack the openside only to put his blindside winger though a gaping hole with a reverse pass.

    Marsh also slotted that conversion as he shared place-kicking duties throughout with JJ Hanrahan.

    The next try ensured Ireland had enough breathing space despite Olding punishing most infringements (the Irish defensive line went offside every time Ulster entered their 22). Again, it came off a solid scrum. When Ulster flanker Dom Gallagher was sin-binned by referee Eanna O’Dowd, Irish hooker and captain Niall Scannell signalled for a scrum.

    With impressive number eight Jordan Coghlan in the blood-bin, former St Gerard’s College backrower Jack Conan switched to number eight. Conan attacked blind, took contact and sent Shane Buckley over with a neat offload.

    Ireland continued to pile on the pressure early in the second half and when they went wide at pace Carthy claimed the third try. The fourth belonged to the rugby brain of McGrath. The scrumhalf’s quick tap and acceleration was enough to get him over before any defenders could stop him.

    IRELAND UNDER-20S: J Carthy (Connacht); C Finn (Connacht), B Daly (Leinster), JJ Hanrahan (Munster), S Coghlan Murray (Leinster); C Marsh (Leinster), K Marmion (Connacht); K McCall (Ulster), N Scannell (Munster), P Reilly (Leinster); T Beirne (Leinster), D Qualter (Connacht); J Conan (Leinster), A Conneely (Connacht), J Coghlan (Leinster). Replacements used: C Gilsenan, S Buckley, C Kindregan, D Higgins, C O’Connell, D Merrey, L McGrath, C Farrell, F Horan.

    ULSTER RAVENS: R Andrew; R Scholes, M Irwin, C Gaston, T Acheson; S Olding, J Creighton; R Jablonski, J Burns, C Carey; D O’Mahony, J Simpson; A Duhig, D Gallagher, D McGuigan. Replacements used: J Andrew, C Taylor, N McComb, P Farrell, M McAuley.

    Referee: E O’Dowd.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,257 ✭✭✭Hagz


    Nice to hear that Marsh and McGrath are impressing from a Leinster point of view.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3 rugby1992


    Why dose jack conan continue to be placed at 6 when his superior quality to jordan coughlan was shown when replaced him at 8 as a blood sub in a match against ulster A. Coughlan appears to show no control and the back of the scrum and is lazy throughout many of the performances I have seen him play. It is very easy to look good in a senior cup with continues go forward ball but when it get tough coughlan dose not have the vision on the pitch to lead at 8 and conan should be the right option


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 37,978 ✭✭✭✭irishbucsfan


    Getting excited about this now!

    Just need to find out how I can watch the U20 6N games from England now.


  • Registered Users Posts: 37,978 ✭✭✭✭irishbucsfan


    rugby1992 wrote: »
    Why dose jack conan continue to be placed at 6 when his superior quality to jordan coughlan was shown when replaced him at 8 as a blood sub in a match against ulster A. Coughlan appears to show no control and the back of the scrum and is lazy throughout many of the performances I have seen him play. It is very easy to look good in a senior cup with continues go forward ball but when it get tough coughlan dose not have the vision on the pitch to lead at 8 and conan should be the right option
    You should let Mike Ruddock know that. He probably knows nothing about playing 8. :pac:


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,881 ✭✭✭PhatPiggins


    Getting excited about this now!

    Just need to find out how I can watch the U20 6N games from England now.

    Are you saying how to watch games played in England or you're based in England? It's late so the brain us slow.

    If its the former I can help you with the bbc site ;)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3 rugby1992


    You should let Mike Ruddock know that. He probably knows nothing about playing 8. :pac:

    You will see in no time that there will be a shift in the team


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 272 ✭✭boynesider


    rugby1992 wrote: »
    Why dose jack conan continue to be placed at 6 when his superior quality to jordan coughlan was shown when replaced him at 8 as a blood sub in a match against ulster A. Coughlan appears to show no control and the back of the scrum and is lazy throughout many of the performances I have seen him play. It is very easy to look good in a senior cup with continues go forward ball but when it get tough coughlan dose not have the vision on the pitch to lead at 8 and conan should be the right option


    Well the word on the street is that Conan is a spoofer ;)


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,000 ✭✭✭Hype710




  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,257 ✭✭✭Hagz


    Noice. Seriously weak tackling though.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,883 ✭✭✭shuffol


    Cracking try, always an element of bad defending with a try like that, assuming Luke McGrath starts he could provide a good impact off the bench.

    That looked like professional camera work, I wonder who does those games and how you can view the footage, Leinster A games used to be available on LTV but not anymore which is a pity.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 272 ✭✭boynesider


    Anyone want to hazard a guess at what the starting team will be?

    There seems to be big competition for places this year with only a few players who will be definite starters such Gilsenan and Hanrahan.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,000 ✭✭✭Hype710


    Is Hanrahan a definite starter? In which position? I think a 10-12 combination of Marsh and Hanrahan would be very creative but pretty tiny. Good options at centre in Farrell and Daly too.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 3,976 ✭✭✭profitius


    Jackson will start at 10 with Hanrahan at 12. That'd be my guess. Jackson was starting last year.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,000 ✭✭✭Hype710


    I would have thought Jackson will be in the Ulster 23, but maybe not if Paddy Wallace is released.


  • Registered Users Posts: 545 ✭✭✭liam12989


    throw in furlong for th, qualter lock, mcgrath or marmiom scrum half, hanrahan leader centres, layden for full back, boland finn wings.


  • Registered Users Posts: 37,978 ✭✭✭✭irishbucsfan


    Hype710 wrote: »
    I would have thought Jackson will be in the Ulster 23, but maybe not if Paddy Wallace is released.
    They might go with McKinney and Olding either. Might be better to release Jackson


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,976 ✭✭✭profitius


    Furlong is injured and I think will miss the tournament.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,257 ✭✭✭Hagz


    Coghlan-Murray will surely be on the wing with either Finn or Daly on the other. Don't know who will be 13.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 272 ✭✭boynesider


    Hanrahan will be either 10, 12 or 13.

    Jackson would have been in pole position for 10 but apparently he was woeful for Ulster A the other week and there are talented alternatives.

    10 marsh
    12 farrell
    13 Hanrahan

    Could be something like this in midfield which looks very exciting


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 272 ✭✭boynesider


    Peter nelson of ulster is another very exciting back who has already played for the senior side while Leyden has been getting some big talk. I would say they are the favourites for Fullback.

    Could be any 2 of 5 lads on the wings


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,257 ✭✭✭Hagz


    I'm surprised than Marcus Walsh is in the squad.

    If I had to take a guess at it
    9. McGrath
    10. Marsh
    11. Coghlan Murray
    12. Hanrahan
    13. Daly
    14. Finn
    15. Layden


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 545 ✭✭✭liam12989


    add in jordi murphy and aaron connelly from last years back row...


Advertisement