Eircode - its implemetation (merged)

It does seem a bit pointless if the postal service aren't using it. Or satnavs.

There's an advert on RTE radio for eircode at the minute, about a mum trying to get her daughter to a friend's house for a birthday party, and says you should the eircode instead of vague directions.

Thing is, how exactly do we use am Europe should a friend give it to you to get to their house?

The thing is (and I believe Eircode is a sub optimal solution and could have been fairly easily improved upon) we have the state creating Eircodes and An Post is a state company. An Post should just be told to use Eircodes and that should be the end of it. I am amazed the world regards us so highly when we have postcodes that aren't used by the post office. I won't say "only in Ireland" because there are probably some banana republics in Africa that have the same problem.

I wouldn't read much into an experience of one person with one employee of an organisation that employs thousands.

People have posted letters with only the eircode written on it and An Post have delivere. This proves that the organisation can and indeed will use eircode.

My own view is that the eircode system is of some use to An Post. It is of much more use to utilities and government agencies, and to couriers who do occasional deliveries to rural areas and so lack the knowledge that An Post staff have from daily rounds.

Bray Head wrote: »

People have posted letters with only the eircode written on it and An Post have delivere. This proves that the organisation can and indeed will use eircode.

I'm having a problem with deliveries since the Eircodes were introduced.

I added the Eircode to my address instead of "Dublin 7" since the code starts "D07" and I've been waited nearly 4 weeks for something that should've been here in 4 days!

The order was in 4 identical boxes with the same exact address on each in the same position on each box.

Box #1 arrived in 4 days; box #2 arrived the following day but box #3 took THREE WEEKS to arrive and when it did, it had
"IMPORTANT : Delay caused by incorrect postal address" labels all over it -- one would've sufficed.

The final box has still not arrived.

I contacted An Post via their website on Wednesday last but I have not yet received a response.


My address is in the format :

XXX Road Name
Dublin
D07 XXXX


--- Previously it would've been always :

XXX Road Name
Dublin 7

Let me try this again...

threeiron wrote: »

Postal districts only exist in Dublin and they are being retained e.g. Dublin 4.

Thank you, I know what a postal district is. It's clear that they remain a viable unit against which An Post can plan deliveries. So I think we are agreed that the districts will continue to "exist". But I dispute that they should have to be flagged twice in every Dublin address label...

threeiron wrote: »

Why do you think the parcels were delayed? Could it be because the address did not say Dublin 7?

If I were a betting man, I'd bet that this was the reason. But I'm making some claims that to me are unrelated to whether or not this is so:

1. That the D07 at the beginning of the postal code asserts the postal district in a sufficiently unambiguous manner that there should be no requirement for a separate articulation in the form of an address line reading "Dublin 7".

2. That the best path to adoption of the postal code is to encourage the public to consider it as an extension of the postal district whose importance they already understand. Not as a separate unrelated item.

3. That the last time a postal service added postal codes to a system that had, in larger towns and cities, used postal districts previously (the UK, from which we inherited the Dublin postal districts), postal codes replaced postal districts instead of augmenting them.

4. That lots of the places in the world that expect you to enter your postal city (airline booking sites most prominently) reject numbers but do have a field for a postal code, so there is a great freedom from being able to discard the district number from the city field.

5. That there is, quite literally, a whole world full of people who don't expect to have to address a letter "Dublin 7, D07 ABCD" (and therefore probably won't) but who are well used to addressing one "Dublin, D07 ABCD".

6. That An Post has had plenty of time to adjust their address scanners to handle gracefully the case where one address line reads "Dublin" and another contains a 7-digit code beginning Dnn or D6W. So there's no real excuse for failing to sort addresses expressed in this (as I've outlined above) extremely reasonable and predictable format.

threeiron wrote: »

An Post software is reading the text address as one item of information and giving preference to it. Hence Dublin on its own prevented their sorting software from working normally. An Post are reading Eircodes as a separate address item.

Unless you have insider knowledge, you can't know this (though I tend to agree with your assumption). What I'm saying is that this is daft behaviour that they have to fix soon.

threeiron wrote: »

I am in sure in time many persons will drop the Dublin 7 but not yet if you want your post delivered on time.

Notwithstanding that the official addresses we are seeing in the postal code finder do retain the Dublin nn format, It's a bad thing and needs to be whacked ASAP.

threeiron wrote: »

Here's what Liam O'Sullivan said at the Oireachtas last November:

One of the principal tenets set by the Department in selecting a code is that people should not have to change their current address. This is related to the Chairman's point about sense of place and attachment to place.

Unless they live in Clare or Roscommon or Kilkenny or dozens of towns around the country, in which case their addresses won't be be changed, they'll just be informed that they've been using the wrong address all along!

He also talked about how they will use Eircodes both in their automatic and manual sorting. The Oireachtas meetings were thoroughly discussed on Boards at the time.

He told the committee what they wanted to hear. Nobody is going to bother their arse asking him to come back and account for the fact that An Post haven't actually implemented any of this (and no, An Post didn't have to wait for eircodes to be delivered tp end users before reconfiguring their systems to use eircodes) and either commit to a date for full implementation, or just admit that An Post aren't really bothered either way, because eircode doesn't actually deliver any real benefit to An Post.

TheChizler wrote: »

Unless they had to wait till the 12th if Eircode are treating them the same as any other customer.

Seriously? You're not in the least bit perturbed by the apparent fact that something that is being sold to the public as a postcode was delivered to the public by the postal service, but that the postal service wasn't given access to the database in time to facilitate the use of this supposed post code?

The words pissup and brewery come to mind.

I spoke to my local postman yesterday morning - I live in a rural area - no house number or house name. He says that the new Eircodes are not used by them - they have no device in the van to use them. And he is not aware of any plans by An Post to install such equipment.

I only raised the question with him, because I discovered that a letter, intended for my daughter, was returned to sender by An Post. The problem arose because the postman was not aware of her new surname - just recently married. I asked the postman if the address had the Eircode on it, would the letter have been delivered. No, he replied, it would not have been delivered - the Eircode makes no difference.

I know this postman well, over the years and he is a very conscientious lad - always goes the extra mile to be helpful.

The problem described above is the exact issue that the Eircode was meant to solve. Or so they told us at the time of its introduction.

If delivery companies are refusing to use the Eircode, then there must a problem with some aspect of the codes - clearly, the delivery companies have looked at the possibility of using them and have decided that the advantages do NOT outweigh the disadvantages.

Some civil servant will get a promotion out of this yet.