Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

New evidence of Homo erectus' sea voyages

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 30,746 ✭✭✭✭Galvasean


    In before Wibbs creamates himself


  • Registered Users Posts: 30,746 ✭✭✭✭Galvasean


    Y'know what else is interesting? 'Wibbs was right' is now a multi-topic boards tag! :cool:


  • Registered Users Posts: 27,564 ✭✭✭✭steddyeddy


    Yep Wibbs will like this. Seriously though very interesting It makes me wonder how advanced erectus was and wheter planning to a large degree was involved in these journeys.


  • Registered Users Posts: 8,551 ✭✭✭Rubecula


    I don't understand why people are surprised by this Intelligence didn't just appear overnight, it evolved like everything else. Just because we have technology built on the past it does not mean the past had nothing to think with.

    If they said Erectus had visited the moon I may be a bit surprised, but sea voyage? Naah of course it is possible, Never thought any differently.


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 5,279 Mod ✭✭✭✭Adam Khor


    Rubecula wrote: »
    I don't understand why people are surprised by this Intelligence didn't just appear overnight, it evolved like everything else. Just because we have technology built on the past it does not mean the past had nothing to think with.

    If they said Erectus had visited the moon I may be a bit surprised, but sea voyage? Naah of course it is possible, Never thought any differently.

    Agreed 100%.

    When a rover finds Homo erectus fossils in the Moon, then I'll be surprised XD


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 20,759 ✭✭✭✭dlofnep


    Galvasean wrote: »
    In before Wibbs creamates himself

    Is Wibbs not a her? :o


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 60,027 Mod ✭✭✭✭Wibbs


    dlofnep wrote:
    Is Wibbs not a her? :o
    Nope, a bloke. If people still think this I need to man up my typing :D

    The hobbits of flores would have had to make a sea voyage to make it to the island up to 1 million years ago and would have had to do so in such numbers to maintain a vigorous breeding population that lasted that long. Not a couple of lads clinging to a tree after a tsunami kinda thing.

    The age part of the above site puzzles me though. 130,000 years old? That's not Erectus, in Europe that's Neandertal (*EDIT* maybe they were Erectus. Here's a wild one(if those dates are correct)Maybe Neandertals never made it to Crete? That without competition from later humans Erectus survived there as island species for much longer than in mainland Europe? That would be a real story and the one I'd be looking at more) Not unless there was another period before we got here when there were two human species. The tool design looks much more erectus though. Neandertals had handaxes but they're usually more consistently knapped. That said quartzite has different properties to flint/chert which may explain the "primitive" shape.

    On that front, note how these boyos adapted their box of tricks to a new environment and raw material. IMHO there are both Erectus and Neandertal tools to be found in Ireland, just not the classic flint based ones as flint is thin on the ground here. Flint tools are the most researched because the earlist and most intensive research in Europe was in areas with flint, so I reckon stuff is being missed. I'd be looking along the south west coast where the ice ages didn't scrape the ground bare.

    Rejoice in the awareness of feeling stupid, for that’s how you end up learning new things. If you’re not aware you’re stupid, you probably are.



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 5,279 Mod ✭✭✭✭Adam Khor


    Wibbs wrote: »
    IMHO there are both Erectus and Neandertal tools to be found in Ireland, just not the classic flint based ones as flint is thin on the ground here. Flint tools are the most researched because the earlist and most intensive research in Europe was in areas with flint, so I reckon stuff is being missed. I'd be looking along the south west coast where the ice ages didn't scrape the ground bare.

    I always thought Homo erectus was limited to warm environments? Enlighten me, plz, oh thou hominin expert?


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 60,027 Mod ✭✭✭✭Wibbs


    Well they were in the UK 800,000 years ago and in a cooler environment than today so they were pretty adaptable.

    Rejoice in the awareness of feeling stupid, for that’s how you end up learning new things. If you’re not aware you’re stupid, you probably are.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,015 ✭✭✭rccaulfield


    Homo erectus-130'000 years ago-who writes and proof reads these things?


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 60,027 Mod ✭✭✭✭Wibbs


    Well to be fair they may well have hung around until more recently http://www.sciencemag.org/content/274/5294/1870.short If Flores man is a dwarf erectus then they defo did at least in on case.

    That said reading more of the stuff on the Crete finds they're a bit vague on the dates. From 130,000 years to 700,000 years in one report. If those dates are accurate or they hav a spread of dates like that then it could well be another "flores" with a population of erectus making it to Crete and remaining there for a long time with no competition from other hominids. In another report the have the dates running as young as 45,000 years old to 130,000 with no mention of older. If those dates are right it's really mad. It means erectus/heidelbergensis might have been around in Crete in an isolated population until much more recently, maybe even "escaped" from the new Sapiens. Those dates would kinda match up for that scenario.

    They're also a bit vague on the species who made the tools. Either erectus or heidelbergensis. Looking at a better pic of one of them with my amateur eye they look more Mousterian/Neandertal to me? http://www.archaeology.org/1101/topten/crete.html with their flat bases. Erectus stuff tends to have more rounded bases. It does look like an earlier human assemblage though. Not us anyway. The ratio of handaxes to flake tools is very high. A little too high for neandertals too. They made handaxes alright but not nearly as much as previous humans. Then again the raw material itslef may be skewing the ratios? Quartzite aint exactly an ideal material for springing stone blades from.

    Basically they need to fix much better dates to those tools/deposits than they currently have.

    Rejoice in the awareness of feeling stupid, for that’s how you end up learning new things. If you’re not aware you’re stupid, you probably are.



Advertisement