Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all,
Vanilla are planning an update to the site on April 24th (next Wednesday). It is a major PHP8 update which is expected to boost performance across the site. The site will be down from 7pm and it is expected to take about an hour to complete. We appreciate your patience during the update.
Thanks all.

Jailed for watching elf and pixie porn.

124»

Comments

  • #92
    Heckler
    Registered Users Posts: 3,322 ✭✭✭Heckler


    Its not a crime to be a pedophile. Its a crime to act on those impluses and abuse children. Its not a crime to want to murder someone but it is a crime to actually kill them.

    Sexual abuse of children is a heinous crime but the OTT "Won't someone think of the children response" is what leads to a bunch of halfwits in the UK assulting a Peadiatricians surgery and I think burning it down because it had a sign outside saying "Pediactrics" or some such.

    Like a pedo is going to advertise.......the mind boggles at peoples stupidity.


  • #93
    orestes
    Closed Accounts Posts: 9,972 ✭✭✭orestes


    My name is URL wrote: »
    Fair enough then, a child. I'm not being hysterical about it.. I couldn't care less if he's jailed or not tbh.

    Do you think a person convicted of rape should be watching videos depicting rape? It doesn't exactly suggest that they've been rehabilitated does it? I don't think people should be locked up just for looking at particular stuff.. but those with a history of violent or abusive sexual behaviors and consuming questionable media shouldn't be surprised if the police come knocking.

    If the guy can be shown to still pose no risk to the public then charges should be dropped, otherwise I'd see them as being a preventative measure more so than a punishment.

    My bad, sorry for being so snappish in my earlier post.
    Prodigious wrote: »
    I haven't read it, but I highly doubt it depicts or describes children participating in sex.

    Actually, it does. Not explicitly, but it alludes to it very strongly. Available in all good bookshops, in the classics section, just like the Marquis de Sade. Do yourself a favour though, if you think Lolita is kiddie porn, reading 100 Days of Sodom might make you tear your eyes out.


Advertisement