What's the best way for me to find out my heart rate training zones so that I can plug them into my garmin?
looking to increase my endurance as well as increase my fitness level.
| 05-03-2012, 02:16 | #1 |
|
Registered User
![]() |
Heart rate training zones on edge 500
What's the best way for me to find out my heart rate training zones so that I can plug them into my garmin?
looking to increase my endurance as well as increase my fitness level. |
|
|
|
Advertisement
|
|
|
| 05-03-2012, 02:52 | #2 |
|
Registered User
![]() |
Set your max bpm and it'll work the zones out for you on the PC interface. At it's most basic level max bpm =220-age
ie 220-27 = max of 193. The absolute max I generally reach while out and about is 183-5 compared to the 193. |
|
|
| Thanks from: |
| 05-03-2012, 07:55 | #4 |
|
Registered User
![]() |
|
|
|
| 05-03-2012, 07:56 | #5 | |
|
Registered User
![]() |
Quote:
![]() Garmin says I've gotten to 212, but I don't believe it as I distinctly remember my chest not exploding |
|
|
|
|
Advertisement
|
|
|
| 05-03-2012, 08:11 | #6 | |
|
Registered User
![]() |
Quote:
It's not the gospel or anything, if there is erroneous data or anomalies, ignore them. |
|
|
|
| Thanks from: |
| 05-03-2012, 09:36 | #7 | |
|
Registered User
![]() |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
| Thanks from: |
| 05-03-2012, 11:23 | #8 |
|
Registered User
![]() |
The 220 minus age gives me a max of 176 at 44 years of age (which is my fast cruising speed) So to get a more usefull maximum I put the bike up on a turbo trainer and after a warm up session I pushed the hardest gear I could at a reasonable cadence (60+) I kept going until I felt I was at my limit. That gave me a maximum of 204 bpm, so that is what I now use in my Garmin 305.
There is also a calculation where you subtract your "resting heart rate" from your "max heart rate" which gives you a "working heart rate" ie 204-48=156, you then work out the various training zones by getting 60%, 70%, 80% and 90% of 156 (WHR), add each one to the resting heart rate to give actual heart rate numbers. 156 x 60% = 93.6 + 48 = 141.6 156 x 70% = 109.2 + 48 = 157.2 156 x 80% = 124.8 + 48 = 172.8 156 x 90% = 140.4 + 48 = 188.4 Obviously everyones resting heart rate is different so that needs to be found also. |
|
|
| 05-03-2012, 20:19 | #9 | |
|
Registered User
![]() |
Quote:
Personally I'd set them based on Lactate Threshold which basically involves taking your average heart rate from a 10 mile time trial less 5% or 25 mile tt with no deduction assuming you pace them properly and they are genuinely maximum efforts. As most training these days revolves around trying to increase sustainable power then it makes sense to anchor around that point however it makes not much difference what you use so long as you pick and stick with it and then train consistently and progressively. Jumping between different formula is going to end in an exercise in frustration with no useful outcome. |
|
|
|
|
Advertisement
|
|
|
| 05-03-2012, 21:59 | #10 |
|
Registered User
![]() |
What are the implications of having a high or low heart rate?
I am 38 my resting heart rate is about 48-52bpm, on an easy spin my average hr is 145 bpm, rising to 175 on a climb or 185 if I put a dig in, maxing out just short of 200bpm. This seems to be about 20bpm above the strava averages. I only put in about 2500km per annum so fitness isn't what it could be. Is the high hrm just a reflection of low relative fitness, am I just trying harder than everybody else or am I in danger of Sudden Adult Death Syndrome.I would be more worried if my mate's HRM was not always 10-15 beats higher than mine
Last edited by ian_rush; 05-03-2012 at 22:02. |
|
|